格雷斯高分辨率摄谱仪在双子座的管道。

A. Chen'e, S. Mao, M. Lundquist, E. Martioli, J. Carlin
{"title":"格雷斯高分辨率摄谱仪在双子座的管道。","authors":"A. Chen'e, S. Mao, M. Lundquist, E. Martioli, J. Carlin","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.2648829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the software DRAGraces (Data Reduction and Analysis for GRACES), which is a pipeline reducing spectra from GRACES (Gemini Remote Access to the CFHT ESPaDOnS Spectrograph) at the Gemini North Telescope. The code is written in the IDL language. It is designed to find all the GRACES frames in a given directory, automatically determine the list of bias, flat, arc and science frames, and perform the whole reduction and extraction within a few minutes. We compare the output from DRAGraces with that of OPERA, a pipeline developed at CFHT that also can extract GRACES spectra. Both pipelines were developed completely independently, yet they give very similar extracted spectra. They both have their advantages and disadvantages. For instance, DRAGraces is more straightforward and easy to use and is less likely to be derailed by a parameter that needs to be tweaked, while OPERA offers a more careful extraction that can be significantly superior when the highest resolution is required and when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. One should compare both before deciding which one to use for their science. Yet, both pipelines deliver a fairly comparable resolution power (R~52.8k and 36.6k for DRAGraces and R~58k and 40k for OPERA in high and low-resolution spectral modes, respectively), wavelength solution and signal-to-noise ratio per resolution element.","PeriodicalId":8459,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DRAGraces: A pipeline for the GRACES high-resolution spectrograph at Gemini.\",\"authors\":\"A. Chen'e, S. Mao, M. Lundquist, E. Martioli, J. Carlin\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/zenodo.2648829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes the software DRAGraces (Data Reduction and Analysis for GRACES), which is a pipeline reducing spectra from GRACES (Gemini Remote Access to the CFHT ESPaDOnS Spectrograph) at the Gemini North Telescope. The code is written in the IDL language. It is designed to find all the GRACES frames in a given directory, automatically determine the list of bias, flat, arc and science frames, and perform the whole reduction and extraction within a few minutes. We compare the output from DRAGraces with that of OPERA, a pipeline developed at CFHT that also can extract GRACES spectra. Both pipelines were developed completely independently, yet they give very similar extracted spectra. They both have their advantages and disadvantages. For instance, DRAGraces is more straightforward and easy to use and is less likely to be derailed by a parameter that needs to be tweaked, while OPERA offers a more careful extraction that can be significantly superior when the highest resolution is required and when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. One should compare both before deciding which one to use for their science. Yet, both pipelines deliver a fairly comparable resolution power (R~52.8k and 36.6k for DRAGraces and R~58k and 40k for OPERA in high and low-resolution spectral modes, respectively), wavelength solution and signal-to-noise ratio per resolution element.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2648829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2648829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一种名为DRAGraces (Data Reduction and Analysis for GRACES)的软件,它是一种对Gemini North望远镜上GRACES (Gemini Remote Access to the CFHT ESPaDOnS Spectrograph)的光谱进行管道化简的软件。代码是用IDL语言编写的。它能在给定的目录中找到所有的grace帧,自动确定bias、flat、arc和science帧的列表,并在几分钟内完成整个还原和提取。我们比较了DRAGraces和OPERA的输出,OPERA是CFHT开发的一个管道,也可以提取GRACES光谱。两种管道都是完全独立开发的,但它们给出了非常相似的提取光谱。他们都有各自的优点和缺点。例如,DRAGraces更直接,更容易使用,并且不太可能因需要调整的参数而偏离轨道,而OPERA提供了更仔细的提取,当需要最高分辨率和信噪比较低时,它可以显着优越。在决定用哪一种进行科学研究之前,人们应该对两者进行比较。然而,这两种管道的分辨率功率(在高分辨率和低分辨率光谱模式下,dragrace的分辨率分别为R~52.8k和36.6k, OPERA的分辨率分别为R~58k和40k)、波长解析度和每个分辨率元件的信噪比都相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DRAGraces: A pipeline for the GRACES high-resolution spectrograph at Gemini.
This paper describes the software DRAGraces (Data Reduction and Analysis for GRACES), which is a pipeline reducing spectra from GRACES (Gemini Remote Access to the CFHT ESPaDOnS Spectrograph) at the Gemini North Telescope. The code is written in the IDL language. It is designed to find all the GRACES frames in a given directory, automatically determine the list of bias, flat, arc and science frames, and perform the whole reduction and extraction within a few minutes. We compare the output from DRAGraces with that of OPERA, a pipeline developed at CFHT that also can extract GRACES spectra. Both pipelines were developed completely independently, yet they give very similar extracted spectra. They both have their advantages and disadvantages. For instance, DRAGraces is more straightforward and easy to use and is less likely to be derailed by a parameter that needs to be tweaked, while OPERA offers a more careful extraction that can be significantly superior when the highest resolution is required and when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. One should compare both before deciding which one to use for their science. Yet, both pipelines deliver a fairly comparable resolution power (R~52.8k and 36.6k for DRAGraces and R~58k and 40k for OPERA in high and low-resolution spectral modes, respectively), wavelength solution and signal-to-noise ratio per resolution element.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Space-based weather observatory at Earth-Moon Lagrange point L1 to monitor earth's magnetotail effects on the Moon The Deep Neural Network based Photometry Framework for Wide Field Small Aperture Telescopes. The Largest Russian Optical Telescope BTA: Current Status and Modernization Prospects DRAGraces: A pipeline for the GRACES high-resolution spectrograph at Gemini. Overview and reassessment of noise budget of starshade exoplanet imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1