过度使用武力、强制警察监视和将持不同政见者定罪。在21世纪的英国镇压青年抗议

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Revista Internacional De Sociologia Pub Date : 2019-11-29 DOI:10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.002
Sarah Pickard
{"title":"过度使用武力、强制警察监视和将持不同政见者定罪。在21世纪的英国镇压青年抗议","authors":"Sarah Pickard","doi":"10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Youth-led protest actions and protests with young people as key protagonists have increased and become more diverse. This article constitutes a detailed case study of evolutions in policing and the legislative framework pertaining to protests and young protesters in Britain, drawing on political sociology, political science, criminology and youth studies. The article first outlines the main protest actions involving young people in twenty-first century Britain. Next, it documents developments in policing tools and methods. It then explains changes to the legislative framework. I argue that through military-style policing tools and methods, combined with authoritarian laws, successive British governments have developed coercive policing, the monitoring of protesters and the criminalisation of dissent. This runs counter to official discourse claiming there has been a return to policing by consent with greater attention to human rights and dialogue following criticisms from various official bodies. Thus, in reality, an ostensibly liberal democratic state is wielding excessive force and coercion, as part of a securitisation process, in a bid to regulate and repress young citizens’ protest actions construed as a disruptive threat to the political status quo. In this way, young citizens are being deprived of their democratic and human right to peaceful protest with important implications for Britain and elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":45827,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuerza excesiva, vigilancia policial coercitiva y criminalización de la disidencia. Reprimir la protesta de los jóvenes en la Gran Bretaña del siglo XXI\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Pickard\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Youth-led protest actions and protests with young people as key protagonists have increased and become more diverse. This article constitutes a detailed case study of evolutions in policing and the legislative framework pertaining to protests and young protesters in Britain, drawing on political sociology, political science, criminology and youth studies. The article first outlines the main protest actions involving young people in twenty-first century Britain. Next, it documents developments in policing tools and methods. It then explains changes to the legislative framework. I argue that through military-style policing tools and methods, combined with authoritarian laws, successive British governments have developed coercive policing, the monitoring of protesters and the criminalisation of dissent. This runs counter to official discourse claiming there has been a return to policing by consent with greater attention to human rights and dialogue following criticisms from various official bodies. Thus, in reality, an ostensibly liberal democratic state is wielding excessive force and coercion, as part of a securitisation process, in a bid to regulate and repress young citizens’ protest actions construed as a disruptive threat to the political status quo. In this way, young citizens are being deprived of their democratic and human right to peaceful protest with important implications for Britain and elsewhere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Internacional De Sociologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Internacional De Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

青年领导的抗议行动和以青年为主要主角的抗议活动有所增加,并变得更加多样化。本文从政治社会学、政治学、犯罪学和青年研究的角度,对英国警务和与抗议和年轻抗议者有关的立法框架的演变进行了详细的案例研究。文章首先概述了21世纪英国年轻人的主要抗议行动。其次,它记录了警务工具和方法的发展。然后解释了立法框架的变化。我认为,通过军事式的警务工具和方法,再加上专制法律,历届英国政府都发展出了强制性警务、对抗议者的监控和对异见人士的刑事定罪。这与官方的说法背道而驰,官方声称,在各种官方机构提出批评后,已经恢复了经同意维持治安的做法,更加重视人权和对话。因此,在现实中,作为证券化过程的一部分,一个表面上自由民主的国家正在使用过度的武力和胁迫,以规范和压制年轻公民的抗议行动,这些抗议行动被视为对政治现状的破坏性威胁。就这样,年轻公民被剥夺了和平抗议的民主和人权,这对英国和其他地方具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fuerza excesiva, vigilancia policial coercitiva y criminalización de la disidencia. Reprimir la protesta de los jóvenes en la Gran Bretaña del siglo XXI
Youth-led protest actions and protests with young people as key protagonists have increased and become more diverse. This article constitutes a detailed case study of evolutions in policing and the legislative framework pertaining to protests and young protesters in Britain, drawing on political sociology, political science, criminology and youth studies. The article first outlines the main protest actions involving young people in twenty-first century Britain. Next, it documents developments in policing tools and methods. It then explains changes to the legislative framework. I argue that through military-style policing tools and methods, combined with authoritarian laws, successive British governments have developed coercive policing, the monitoring of protesters and the criminalisation of dissent. This runs counter to official discourse claiming there has been a return to policing by consent with greater attention to human rights and dialogue following criticisms from various official bodies. Thus, in reality, an ostensibly liberal democratic state is wielding excessive force and coercion, as part of a securitisation process, in a bid to regulate and repress young citizens’ protest actions construed as a disruptive threat to the political status quo. In this way, young citizens are being deprived of their democratic and human right to peaceful protest with important implications for Britain and elsewhere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Desinformación e islamofobia en tiempos de infodemia. Un análisis sociológico desde España El efecto electoral de la coalición de la izquierda radical española para las elecciones generales de 2016. Un análisis cuasiexperimental con datos de encuestas Análisis complejo de las acciones de crítica. Aportes al modelo De la justification de Boltanski y Thévenot El problema de la doble contingencia en las teorías sociológicas de Talcott Parsons y Niklas Luhmann Desigualdad y movilidad de renta: la ‘curva del Gran Gatsby’ en 46 provincias españolas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1