四国学术人员对高等教育学习分析期望的跨案例分析

IF 6.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100788
Kaire Kollom , Kairit Tammets , Maren Scheffel , Yi-Shan Tsai , Ioana Jivet , Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino , Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos , Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright , Adolfo Ruiz Calleja , Dragan Gasevic , Carlos Delgado Kloos , Hendrik Drachsler , Tobias Ley
{"title":"四国学术人员对高等教育学习分析期望的跨案例分析","authors":"Kaire Kollom ,&nbsp;Kairit Tammets ,&nbsp;Maren Scheffel ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Tsai ,&nbsp;Ioana Jivet ,&nbsp;Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino ,&nbsp;Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos ,&nbsp;Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright ,&nbsp;Adolfo Ruiz Calleja ,&nbsp;Dragan Gasevic ,&nbsp;Carlos Delgado Kloos ,&nbsp;Hendrik Drachsler ,&nbsp;Tobias Ley","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to explore the expectations of academic staff to learning analytics services from an ideal as well as a realistic perspective. This mixed-method study focused on a cross-case analysis of staff from Higher Education Institutions from four European universities (Spain, Estonia, Netherlands, UK). While there are some differences between the countries as well as between ideal and predicted expectations, the overarching results indicate that academic staff sees learning analytics as a tool to understand the learning activities and possibility to provide feedback for the students and adapt the curriculum to meet learners' needs. However, one of the findings from the study across cases is the generally consistently low expectation and desire for academic staff to be obligated to act based on data that shows students being at risk of failing or under-performing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100788"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A four-country cross-case analysis of academic staff expectations about learning analytics in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Kaire Kollom ,&nbsp;Kairit Tammets ,&nbsp;Maren Scheffel ,&nbsp;Yi-Shan Tsai ,&nbsp;Ioana Jivet ,&nbsp;Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino ,&nbsp;Pedro Manuel Moreno-Marcos ,&nbsp;Alexander Whitelock-Wainwright ,&nbsp;Adolfo Ruiz Calleja ,&nbsp;Dragan Gasevic ,&nbsp;Carlos Delgado Kloos ,&nbsp;Hendrik Drachsler ,&nbsp;Tobias Ley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this paper is to explore the expectations of academic staff to learning analytics services from an ideal as well as a realistic perspective. This mixed-method study focused on a cross-case analysis of staff from Higher Education Institutions from four European universities (Spain, Estonia, Netherlands, UK). While there are some differences between the countries as well as between ideal and predicted expectations, the overarching results indicate that academic staff sees learning analytics as a tool to understand the learning activities and possibility to provide feedback for the students and adapt the curriculum to meet learners' needs. However, one of the findings from the study across cases is the generally consistently low expectation and desire for academic staff to be obligated to act based on data that shows students being at risk of failing or under-performing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet and Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751620300646\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751620300646","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

本文的目的是从理想和现实的角度探讨学术人员对学习分析服务的期望。这项混合方法研究的重点是对来自四所欧洲大学(西班牙、爱沙尼亚、荷兰和英国)的高等教育机构的工作人员进行跨案例分析。虽然各国之间以及理想期望和预测期望之间存在一些差异,但总体结果表明,学术人员将学习分析视为了解学习活动和为学生提供反馈并调整课程以满足学习者需求的可能性的工具。然而,这项跨案例研究的一个发现是,人们对学术人员有义务根据显示学生有失败或表现不佳的风险的数据采取行动的期望和愿望普遍较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A four-country cross-case analysis of academic staff expectations about learning analytics in higher education

The purpose of this paper is to explore the expectations of academic staff to learning analytics services from an ideal as well as a realistic perspective. This mixed-method study focused on a cross-case analysis of staff from Higher Education Institutions from four European universities (Spain, Estonia, Netherlands, UK). While there are some differences between the countries as well as between ideal and predicted expectations, the overarching results indicate that academic staff sees learning analytics as a tool to understand the learning activities and possibility to provide feedback for the students and adapt the curriculum to meet learners' needs. However, one of the findings from the study across cases is the generally consistently low expectation and desire for academic staff to be obligated to act based on data that shows students being at risk of failing or under-performing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The paradox of self-efficacy and technological dependence: Unraveling generative AI's impact on university students' task completion Prior online learning experiences as incidental professional development: A cross-sectional survey of online instructor beliefs and strategies Interaction and dialogue: Integration and application of artificial intelligence in blended mode writing feedback A situated expectancy-value theoretical perspective of teaching presence and student engagement in blended learning environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1