{"title":"抗拒读者的力量","authors":"Jay","doi":"10.5325/reception.13.1.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The argument of Judith Fetterley’s The Resisting Reader focuses on the centrality of “power” to feminist criticism, and how a critique of gendered power relations leads to an unmasking of what she terms “immasculation.” This names a process in which women readers (and critics) are compelled to identify with male perspectives and patriarchal values in fiction written by men. In contrast she posits the power of women-centered reading practices and resistance to homophobic interpretive and scholarly conventions.","PeriodicalId":40584,"journal":{"name":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","volume":"82 1","pages":"33 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Power of the Resisting Reader\",\"authors\":\"Jay\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/reception.13.1.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The argument of Judith Fetterley’s The Resisting Reader focuses on the centrality of “power” to feminist criticism, and how a critique of gendered power relations leads to an unmasking of what she terms “immasculation.” This names a process in which women readers (and critics) are compelled to identify with male perspectives and patriarchal values in fiction written by men. In contrast she posits the power of women-centered reading practices and resistance to homophobic interpretive and scholarly conventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/reception.13.1.0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reception-Texts Readers Audiences History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/reception.13.1.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
abstract:The argument of Judith Fetterley’s The Resisting Reader focuses on the centrality of “power” to feminist criticism, and how a critique of gendered power relations leads to an unmasking of what she terms “immasculation.” This names a process in which women readers (and critics) are compelled to identify with male perspectives and patriarchal values in fiction written by men. In contrast she posits the power of women-centered reading practices and resistance to homophobic interpretive and scholarly conventions.
期刊介绍：
Reception: Texts, Readers, Audiences, History is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal published once a year. It seeks to promote dialog and discussion among scholars engaged in theoretical and practical analyses in several related fields: reader-response criticism and pedagogy, reception study, history of reading and the book, audience and communication studies, institutional studies and histories, as well as interpretive strategies related to feminism, race and ethnicity, gender and sexuality, and postcolonial studies, focusing mainly but not exclusively on the literature, culture, and media of England and the United States.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
