政党的坚持:18世纪英国和谐不和的观念

Q2 Arts and Humanities Parliaments, Estates and Representation Pub Date : 2023-03-17 DOI:10.1080/02606755.2023.2185359
R. Eagles
{"title":"政党的坚持:18世纪英国和谐不和的观念","authors":"R. Eagles","doi":"10.1080/02606755.2023.2185359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indeed, Walters’ contentions concerning representation in chapter three and the issue of ‘parliamentary Erastianism’ in chapter two are likely to spark further discussion in the field. Furthermore, there remains more to be said on the influence of these debates beyond political thought and into political praxis, which the author evokes with reference to Whig and Tory debates and parliamentary activity from the 1670s to the 1690s. However, the focus on printed debates instead of manuscript material may tend to obscure some of the further complexities which Walters illustrates in this reassessment of the place of the Covenants in England after 1660.","PeriodicalId":53586,"journal":{"name":"Parliaments, Estates and Representation","volume":"281 1","pages":"219 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The persistence of party: ideas of harmonious discord in eighteenth-century Britain\",\"authors\":\"R. Eagles\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02606755.2023.2185359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indeed, Walters’ contentions concerning representation in chapter three and the issue of ‘parliamentary Erastianism’ in chapter two are likely to spark further discussion in the field. Furthermore, there remains more to be said on the influence of these debates beyond political thought and into political praxis, which the author evokes with reference to Whig and Tory debates and parliamentary activity from the 1670s to the 1690s. However, the focus on printed debates instead of manuscript material may tend to obscure some of the further complexities which Walters illustrates in this reassessment of the place of the Covenants in England after 1660.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parliaments, Estates and Representation\",\"volume\":\"281 1\",\"pages\":\"219 - 221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parliaments, Estates and Representation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2023.2185359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parliaments, Estates and Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02606755.2023.2185359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

事实上,沃尔特斯在第三章中关于代表制的争论和第二章中关于“议会伊拉斯汀主义”的问题可能会引发该领域的进一步讨论。此外,这些辩论的影响超越了政治思想,进入了政治实践,作者引用了17世纪70年代至90年代辉格党和托利党辩论和议会活动,这一点还有更多可说的。然而,对印刷辩论而不是手稿材料的关注可能会掩盖沃尔特斯在重新评估1660年后英格兰盟约地位时所阐述的一些进一步的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The persistence of party: ideas of harmonious discord in eighteenth-century Britain
Indeed, Walters’ contentions concerning representation in chapter three and the issue of ‘parliamentary Erastianism’ in chapter two are likely to spark further discussion in the field. Furthermore, there remains more to be said on the influence of these debates beyond political thought and into political praxis, which the author evokes with reference to Whig and Tory debates and parliamentary activity from the 1670s to the 1690s. However, the focus on printed debates instead of manuscript material may tend to obscure some of the further complexities which Walters illustrates in this reassessment of the place of the Covenants in England after 1660.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parliaments, Estates and Representation
Parliaments, Estates and Representation Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Interpreting multilateral diplomacy in the Indonesian Parliament’s debates on climate crisis and sustainability Red star over the Baltic: the sovietisation of representative assemblies in Poland's ‘Recovered Territories’ via the ‘three times “Yes”’ referendum of 1946 Importable or exceptional? Swiss direct-democratic instruments in the French and German Parliaments, 2000–19 The Portuguese customary electoral constitution: the election of representatives to the ancient cortes The German Parliament and the political crisis of 1917–18: the role of the Intergroup Commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1