英国转向有机农业的经济影响

David Bateman, Nicolas Lampkin
{"title":"英国转向有机农业的经济影响","authors":"David Bateman,&nbsp;Nicolas Lampkin","doi":"10.1016/0309-586X(86)90073-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>British agricultural policy, long under attack, is now no longer defensible. An attempt is made to present a set of objectives which would be widely acceptable. Organic farming is discussed in relation to these objectives. There is evidence that an extension of organic farming would, compared with conventional farming, offer some clear advantages: output would be lower, the environment would benefit, soil erosion would be reduced and some nutritional fears (particularly those associated with the use of pesticides) would be allayed. This does not imply that organic farming is a panacea for all our agricultural problems. It is suggested that in the past policies have, by default rather than by intention, discriminated against organic farming; proposals for correcting this are advanced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100059,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 89-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0309-586X(86)90073-7","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic implications of a shift to organic agriculture in Britain\",\"authors\":\"David Bateman,&nbsp;Nicolas Lampkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0309-586X(86)90073-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>British agricultural policy, long under attack, is now no longer defensible. An attempt is made to present a set of objectives which would be widely acceptable. Organic farming is discussed in relation to these objectives. There is evidence that an extension of organic farming would, compared with conventional farming, offer some clear advantages: output would be lower, the environment would benefit, soil erosion would be reduced and some nutritional fears (particularly those associated with the use of pesticides) would be allayed. This does not imply that organic farming is a panacea for all our agricultural problems. It is suggested that in the past policies have, by default rather than by intention, discriminated against organic farming; proposals for correcting this are advanced.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Administration\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0309-586X(86)90073-7\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0309586X86900737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0309586X86900737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

长期受到攻击的英国农业政策如今已站不住脚。我们试图提出一套能被广泛接受的目标。有机农业的讨论与这些目标有关。有证据表明,与传统农业相比,有机农业的扩展将提供一些明显的优势:产量会降低,环境会受益,土壤侵蚀会减少,一些营养方面的担忧(特别是与使用农药有关的担忧)会得到缓解。这并不意味着有机农业是解决我们所有农业问题的灵丹妙药。有人认为,过去的政策是默认的,而不是有意的,歧视有机农业;提出了纠正这一问题的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic implications of a shift to organic agriculture in Britain

British agricultural policy, long under attack, is now no longer defensible. An attempt is made to present a set of objectives which would be widely acceptable. Organic farming is discussed in relation to these objectives. There is evidence that an extension of organic farming would, compared with conventional farming, offer some clear advantages: output would be lower, the environment would benefit, soil erosion would be reduced and some nutritional fears (particularly those associated with the use of pesticides) would be allayed. This does not imply that organic farming is a panacea for all our agricultural problems. It is suggested that in the past policies have, by default rather than by intention, discriminated against organic farming; proposals for correcting this are advanced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Recurrent costs in agricultural development The EEC and the food industries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1