系统性硬化症和器官特异性抗体。

E. Wielosz, M. Majdan, Arkadiusz Koszarny, M. Dryglewska, J. Tabarkiewicz
{"title":"系统性硬化症和器官特异性抗体。","authors":"E. Wielosz, M. Majdan, Arkadiusz Koszarny, M. Dryglewska, J. Tabarkiewicz","doi":"10.20452/pamw.3583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION    According to literature, some organ-specific antibodies may be present in systemic sclerosis (SSc).  OBJECTIVES    The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of antithyroid antibodies (aTPO and/or aTG) and antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) in SSc patients (pts) moreover, to evaluate their clinical consequences.  PATIENTS AND METHODS    Analysis involved 86 consecutive patients with SSc hospitalized in the Department of Rheumatology; 32 patients had diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) and 54 had limited cutaneous (lcSSc). Patients were observed for autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATDs) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Serum samples were obtained from each patient.  RESULTS    27/86 pts (31%) had positive antithyroid antibodies and 11/86 pts (13%) had positive AMAs. ATD was diagnosed in 26/86 pts (30%) and PBC in 10/86 pts (12%) with SSc. No significant intergroup differences in the prevalence of antithyroid antibodies were found between dcSSc vs. lcSSc patients, but the prevalence of AMAs was significantly higher in lcSSc compared to dcSSc. The prevalence of anti-Ro-52 antibodies was significantly higher in the SSc group with positive aTPO antibodies compared to the SSc group with negative aTPO antibodies. The prevalence of anticentromere antibodies (ACAs) was significantly higher in the SSc group with positive AMAs compared to the SSc group with negative AMAs.  CONCLUSIONS    The prevalence of organ-specific antibodies in SSc patients is relatively high.  The prevalence of AMAs is higher in the lcSSc than in the dcSSc group and is strongly associated with ACAs. Therefore patients with systemic sclerosis should be evaluated for coexisting ATD and PBC.","PeriodicalId":20343,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","volume":"175 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systemic sclerosis and organ - specific antibodies.\",\"authors\":\"E. Wielosz, M. Majdan, Arkadiusz Koszarny, M. Dryglewska, J. Tabarkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/pamw.3583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION    According to literature, some organ-specific antibodies may be present in systemic sclerosis (SSc).  OBJECTIVES    The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of antithyroid antibodies (aTPO and/or aTG) and antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) in SSc patients (pts) moreover, to evaluate their clinical consequences.  PATIENTS AND METHODS    Analysis involved 86 consecutive patients with SSc hospitalized in the Department of Rheumatology; 32 patients had diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) and 54 had limited cutaneous (lcSSc). Patients were observed for autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATDs) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Serum samples were obtained from each patient.  RESULTS    27/86 pts (31%) had positive antithyroid antibodies and 11/86 pts (13%) had positive AMAs. ATD was diagnosed in 26/86 pts (30%) and PBC in 10/86 pts (12%) with SSc. No significant intergroup differences in the prevalence of antithyroid antibodies were found between dcSSc vs. lcSSc patients, but the prevalence of AMAs was significantly higher in lcSSc compared to dcSSc. The prevalence of anti-Ro-52 antibodies was significantly higher in the SSc group with positive aTPO antibodies compared to the SSc group with negative aTPO antibodies. The prevalence of anticentromere antibodies (ACAs) was significantly higher in the SSc group with positive AMAs compared to the SSc group with negative AMAs.  CONCLUSIONS    The prevalence of organ-specific antibodies in SSc patients is relatively high.  The prevalence of AMAs is higher in the lcSSc than in the dcSSc group and is strongly associated with ACAs. Therefore patients with systemic sclerosis should be evaluated for coexisting ATD and PBC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej\",\"volume\":\"175 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

根据文献报道,一些器官特异性抗体可能存在于系统性硬化症(SSc)中。本研究的目的是评估SSc患者(pts)中抗甲状腺抗体(aTPO和/或aTG)和抗线粒体抗体(AMAs)的患病率,并评估其临床后果。患者和方法纳入风湿科86例连续住院的SSc患者;32例为弥漫性皮肤(dcSSc), 54例为局限性皮肤(lcSSc)。观察患者是否有自身免疫性甲状腺疾病(ATDs)和原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)。从每位患者身上采集血清样本。结果抗甲状腺抗体阳性27/86例(31%),抗体阳性11/86例(13%)。SSc患者中有26/86(30%)诊断为ATD, 10/86(12%)诊断为PBC。在dcSSc和lcSSc患者之间,抗甲状腺抗体的患病率没有明显的组间差异,但与dcSSc相比,lcSSc患者的AMAs患病率明显更高。与aTPO抗体阴性的SSc组相比,aTPO抗体阳性的SSc组抗ro -52抗体的患病率明显更高。与AMAs阴性的SSc组相比,AMAs阳性的SSc组抗着丝点抗体(ACAs)的患病率显著高于AMAs阴性的SSc组。结论SSc患者中器官特异性抗体的患病率较高。与dcSSc组相比,lcSSc组的AMAs患病率更高,并且与ACAs密切相关。因此,系统性硬化症患者应评估ATD和PBC是否同时存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systemic sclerosis and organ - specific antibodies.
INTRODUCTION    According to literature, some organ-specific antibodies may be present in systemic sclerosis (SSc).  OBJECTIVES    The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of antithyroid antibodies (aTPO and/or aTG) and antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) in SSc patients (pts) moreover, to evaluate their clinical consequences.  PATIENTS AND METHODS    Analysis involved 86 consecutive patients with SSc hospitalized in the Department of Rheumatology; 32 patients had diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) and 54 had limited cutaneous (lcSSc). Patients were observed for autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATDs) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Serum samples were obtained from each patient.  RESULTS    27/86 pts (31%) had positive antithyroid antibodies and 11/86 pts (13%) had positive AMAs. ATD was diagnosed in 26/86 pts (30%) and PBC in 10/86 pts (12%) with SSc. No significant intergroup differences in the prevalence of antithyroid antibodies were found between dcSSc vs. lcSSc patients, but the prevalence of AMAs was significantly higher in lcSSc compared to dcSSc. The prevalence of anti-Ro-52 antibodies was significantly higher in the SSc group with positive aTPO antibodies compared to the SSc group with negative aTPO antibodies. The prevalence of anticentromere antibodies (ACAs) was significantly higher in the SSc group with positive AMAs compared to the SSc group with negative AMAs.  CONCLUSIONS    The prevalence of organ-specific antibodies in SSc patients is relatively high.  The prevalence of AMAs is higher in the lcSSc than in the dcSSc group and is strongly associated with ACAs. Therefore patients with systemic sclerosis should be evaluated for coexisting ATD and PBC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Relapsing polychondritis]. [Inclusion body myositis]. [Nephrotic syndrome]. [Mesangium]. [Hepatorenal syndrome].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1