聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素治疗复发性卵巢癌:是否有维持治疗的作用?

Beth Cronin , Katina Robison , Christina Raker , Richard Moore , Cornelius O. Granai , Don S. Dizon
{"title":"聚乙二醇化脂质体阿霉素治疗复发性卵巢癌:是否有维持治疗的作用?","authors":"Beth Cronin ,&nbsp;Katina Robison ,&nbsp;Christina Raker ,&nbsp;Richard Moore ,&nbsp;Cornelius O. Granai ,&nbsp;Don S. Dizon","doi":"10.1016/j.cogc.2014.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of death in women. PLD has been effective in recurrent ovarian cancer, but the ideal treatment length is unknown. We hypothesized that patients with regression or stabilization of disease while receiving PLD, who continued with prolonged treatment, would have increased PFS.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review was performed of women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, or uterine papillary serous carcinoma, who received 6 or more cycles of PLD without evidence of progression. Evaluation for progression was based on carcinoma antigen 125, physical examination, and imaging studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 30 patients meeting criteria for inclusion, 13 patients (43%) stopped treatment at best response (median, 6 cycles) and 17 (57%) continued treatment until disease progression (median, 11 cycles). Patients treated to best response experienced a significantly shorter PFS compared with those who continued treatment until progression, median 10 versus 15 months (<em>P</em> = .009). There was a trend toward improved OS in the prolonged therapy group of 42.5 months (range, 12-84) versus 23 months in the standard therapy group (range, 17-98; <em>P</em> = .56).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our data suggest that prolonged PLD treatment to progression is associated with a PFS advantage compared with treatment to best response. In the absence of toxicity, this treatment paradigm should be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 17-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogc.2014.06.007","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Is There a Role for Maintenance Therapy?\",\"authors\":\"Beth Cronin ,&nbsp;Katina Robison ,&nbsp;Christina Raker ,&nbsp;Richard Moore ,&nbsp;Cornelius O. Granai ,&nbsp;Don S. Dizon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogc.2014.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of death in women. PLD has been effective in recurrent ovarian cancer, but the ideal treatment length is unknown. We hypothesized that patients with regression or stabilization of disease while receiving PLD, who continued with prolonged treatment, would have increased PFS.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review was performed of women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, or uterine papillary serous carcinoma, who received 6 or more cycles of PLD without evidence of progression. Evaluation for progression was based on carcinoma antigen 125, physical examination, and imaging studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 30 patients meeting criteria for inclusion, 13 patients (43%) stopped treatment at best response (median, 6 cycles) and 17 (57%) continued treatment until disease progression (median, 11 cycles). Patients treated to best response experienced a significantly shorter PFS compared with those who continued treatment until progression, median 10 versus 15 months (<em>P</em> = .009). There was a trend toward improved OS in the prolonged therapy group of 42.5 months (range, 12-84) versus 23 months in the standard therapy group (range, 17-98; <em>P</em> = .56).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our data suggest that prolonged PLD treatment to progression is associated with a PFS advantage compared with treatment to best response. In the absence of toxicity, this treatment paradigm should be considered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 17-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogc.2014.06.007\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212955314000313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212955314000313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

卵巢癌是妇女死亡的第五大原因。PLD对复发性卵巢癌有效,但理想的治疗时间尚不清楚。我们假设,在接受PLD治疗时病情消退或稳定的患者,如果继续延长治疗,PFS会增加。患者和方法回顾性回顾了复发性卵巢、输卵管、原发性腹膜或子宫乳头状浆液性癌的女性,这些女性接受了6个或更多周期的PLD,没有进展的证据。评估进展是基于癌抗原125、体格检查和影像学检查。在符合纳入标准的30例患者中,13例(43%)患者在最佳缓解时停止治疗(中位数,6个周期),17例(57%)患者继续治疗直至疾病进展(中位数,11个周期)。与继续治疗直至进展的患者相比,获得最佳缓解的患者的PFS显著缩短,中位数为10个月vs 15个月(P = 0.009)。延长治疗组42.5个月(范围12-84)有改善OS的趋势,而标准治疗组为23个月(范围17-98;P = .56)。结论:我们的数据表明,与治疗至最佳反应相比,延长PLD治疗至进展与PFS优势相关。在没有毒性的情况下,应该考虑这种治疗模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Is There a Role for Maintenance Therapy?

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of death in women. PLD has been effective in recurrent ovarian cancer, but the ideal treatment length is unknown. We hypothesized that patients with regression or stabilization of disease while receiving PLD, who continued with prolonged treatment, would have increased PFS.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, or uterine papillary serous carcinoma, who received 6 or more cycles of PLD without evidence of progression. Evaluation for progression was based on carcinoma antigen 125, physical examination, and imaging studies.

Results

Of the 30 patients meeting criteria for inclusion, 13 patients (43%) stopped treatment at best response (median, 6 cycles) and 17 (57%) continued treatment until disease progression (median, 11 cycles). Patients treated to best response experienced a significantly shorter PFS compared with those who continued treatment until progression, median 10 versus 15 months (P = .009). There was a trend toward improved OS in the prolonged therapy group of 42.5 months (range, 12-84) versus 23 months in the standard therapy group (range, 17-98; P = .56).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that prolonged PLD treatment to progression is associated with a PFS advantage compared with treatment to best response. In the absence of toxicity, this treatment paradigm should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Epigenetic Pathways Offer Targets for Ovarian Cancer Treatment Table of Contents Editorial Board A Simulation Study of the Factors Influencing the Risk of Intraoperative Slipping Genetic Cancer Ovary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1