与战略服务客户的需求延迟

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Manufacturing Engineering Pub Date : 2020-08-11 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3671121
Haiyan Wang, T. Olsen, Timofey Shalpegin
{"title":"与战略服务客户的需求延迟","authors":"Haiyan Wang, T. Olsen, Timofey Shalpegin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3671121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We study capacity decisions in a service environment with seasonal arrival rates and strategic customers. Due to seasonality, the firm uses a postponement strategy where compensation is given to the peak-time customers who cannot be served in the peak time and agree to delay service. We extend the analysis of demand postponement to the case with strategic customers, i.e., off-peak customers who may pretend to be peak-time customers purely to receive the postponement discount. Focusing on the capacity and discount decisions for the service provider, we develop a game-theoretic model to study when the service provider should consider using a postponement strategy in the presence of strategic customers. At the first stage, the service provider decides on the capacity level and discount. At the second stage, strategic customers decide whether to show up in the peak time. We find that strategic customers exhibit a “follow-the-crowd” type of behavior. Unsurprisingly, we find that the presence of strategic customers does not benefit the service provider. More interestingly, we find that the presence of strategic customers may benefit the peak-time customers, unlike the inventory literature with strategic (arrival-timing) customers, in which the supplier’s response is usually detrimental to non-strategic customers. In the presence of strategic customers, the supplier needs to offer a lower discount or build more capacity than without strategic customers. If the supplier does not have control over the discount value, she might need to build excess capacity to prevent the strategic customers from showing up in the peak time.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"113 1-2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demand Postponement with Strategic Service Customers\",\"authors\":\"Haiyan Wang, T. Olsen, Timofey Shalpegin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3671121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We study capacity decisions in a service environment with seasonal arrival rates and strategic customers. Due to seasonality, the firm uses a postponement strategy where compensation is given to the peak-time customers who cannot be served in the peak time and agree to delay service. We extend the analysis of demand postponement to the case with strategic customers, i.e., off-peak customers who may pretend to be peak-time customers purely to receive the postponement discount. Focusing on the capacity and discount decisions for the service provider, we develop a game-theoretic model to study when the service provider should consider using a postponement strategy in the presence of strategic customers. At the first stage, the service provider decides on the capacity level and discount. At the second stage, strategic customers decide whether to show up in the peak time. We find that strategic customers exhibit a “follow-the-crowd” type of behavior. Unsurprisingly, we find that the presence of strategic customers does not benefit the service provider. More interestingly, we find that the presence of strategic customers may benefit the peak-time customers, unlike the inventory literature with strategic (arrival-timing) customers, in which the supplier’s response is usually detrimental to non-strategic customers. In the presence of strategic customers, the supplier needs to offer a lower discount or build more capacity than without strategic customers. If the supplier does not have control over the discount value, she might need to build excess capacity to prevent the strategic customers from showing up in the peak time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Engineering\",\"volume\":\"113 1-2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3671121\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3671121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要研究了具有季节性到达率和战略客户的服务环境下的运力决策。由于季节性因素,该公司采用延迟策略,即对高峰时段无法获得服务并同意延迟服务的高峰时段客户进行补偿。我们将需求延迟的分析扩展到具有战略客户的情况,即非高峰客户,他们可能假装是高峰客户,纯粹是为了获得延迟折扣。针对服务提供商的容量和折扣决策,我们建立了一个博弈论模型来研究在存在战略客户的情况下服务提供商何时应该考虑使用延迟策略。在第一阶段,服务提供商决定容量水平和折扣。在第二阶段,战略客户决定是否在高峰时间出现。我们发现战略客户表现出一种“随大流”的行为。不出所料,我们发现战略客户的存在对服务提供商没有好处。更有趣的是,我们发现战略客户的存在可能有利于高峰客户,而不像库存文献中有战略(到货时间)客户,其中供应商的反应通常不利于非战略客户。在有战略客户的情况下,供应商需要提供比没有战略客户时更低的折扣或建立更多的产能。如果供应商无法控制折扣值,她可能需要建立过剩产能,以防止战略客户在高峰时间出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demand Postponement with Strategic Service Customers
Abstract We study capacity decisions in a service environment with seasonal arrival rates and strategic customers. Due to seasonality, the firm uses a postponement strategy where compensation is given to the peak-time customers who cannot be served in the peak time and agree to delay service. We extend the analysis of demand postponement to the case with strategic customers, i.e., off-peak customers who may pretend to be peak-time customers purely to receive the postponement discount. Focusing on the capacity and discount decisions for the service provider, we develop a game-theoretic model to study when the service provider should consider using a postponement strategy in the presence of strategic customers. At the first stage, the service provider decides on the capacity level and discount. At the second stage, strategic customers decide whether to show up in the peak time. We find that strategic customers exhibit a “follow-the-crowd” type of behavior. Unsurprisingly, we find that the presence of strategic customers does not benefit the service provider. More interestingly, we find that the presence of strategic customers may benefit the peak-time customers, unlike the inventory literature with strategic (arrival-timing) customers, in which the supplier’s response is usually detrimental to non-strategic customers. In the presence of strategic customers, the supplier needs to offer a lower discount or build more capacity than without strategic customers. If the supplier does not have control over the discount value, she might need to build excess capacity to prevent the strategic customers from showing up in the peak time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Capacity Co-Opetition in Service Clusters with Waiting-area Entertainment Cloud-Kitchens in High-Density Cities: Economies of Scale Through Co-Location Credit Chain and Sectoral Co-movement: A Multi-Region Investigation Approximations for the Lead Time Variance: A Forecasting and Inventory Evaluation Reselling or Agency Selling? Consumer Valuation, Quality Design, and Manufacturers' Competition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1