{"title":"软件架构何去何从?(主题)","authors":"J. Kramer","doi":"10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its early beginnings in the 1980s, much has been achieved in the research field of software architecture. Among other aspects, this research has produced foundational work on the specification, analysis and component configuration of software architectures, including the development of associated software tools. However, adoption of the research by industry has been largely methodological rather than based on precise specifications in architecture description languages (ADLs) or rigorously underpinned by formal models of behaviour and non-functional attributes. Why is this? Why were the actual formalisms and tools not more widely adopted? Can we draw any lessons from this? In this talk, I hope to explore this further, drawing on my personal experience as a researcher in distributed software architectures. \n I particularly hope to tickle the fancy of the younger members of our community, indicating the excitement of research, the benefits of belonging to a vibrant research community such as ours, and the benefits of being an active contributor. For the more mature researchers, there will be some nostalgic memories combined with some inevitable stepping on toes. For both young and old, there will be some thoughts for research opportunities as the need for self-managing adaptive software systems becomes more urgent.","PeriodicalId":91595,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering","volume":"57 1","pages":"963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whither software architecture? (keynote)\",\"authors\":\"J. Kramer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since its early beginnings in the 1980s, much has been achieved in the research field of software architecture. Among other aspects, this research has produced foundational work on the specification, analysis and component configuration of software architectures, including the development of associated software tools. However, adoption of the research by industry has been largely methodological rather than based on precise specifications in architecture description languages (ADLs) or rigorously underpinned by formal models of behaviour and non-functional attributes. Why is this? Why were the actual formalisms and tools not more widely adopted? Can we draw any lessons from this? In this talk, I hope to explore this further, drawing on my personal experience as a researcher in distributed software architectures. \\n I particularly hope to tickle the fancy of the younger members of our community, indicating the excitement of research, the benefits of belonging to a vibrant research community such as ours, and the benefits of being an active contributor. For the more mature researchers, there will be some nostalgic memories combined with some inevitable stepping on toes. For both young and old, there will be some thoughts for research opportunities as the need for self-managing adaptive software systems becomes more urgent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"963\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

从20世纪80年代开始,软件架构的研究领域已经取得了很大的成就。在其他方面,这项研究产生了关于软件架构的规范、分析和组件配置的基础工作,包括相关软件工具的开发。然而,工业界对该研究的采用在很大程度上是方法论的,而不是基于架构描述语言(adl)中的精确规范,或者严格地以行为和非功能属性的正式模型为基础。为什么会这样?为什么实际的形式主义和工具没有被更广泛地采用?我们能从中吸取什么教训吗?在这次演讲中,我希望利用我作为分布式软件架构研究人员的个人经验,进一步探讨这个问题。我特别希望能激起我们社区年轻成员的兴趣,表明研究的兴奋,属于我们这样一个充满活力的研究社区的好处,以及成为一个积极的贡献者的好处。对于更成熟的研究人员来说,会有一些怀旧的回忆,同时也会有一些不可避免的冒犯。对于年轻人和老年人来说,随着对自我管理自适应软件系统的需求变得更加迫切,将会有一些研究机会的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whither software architecture? (keynote)
Since its early beginnings in the 1980s, much has been achieved in the research field of software architecture. Among other aspects, this research has produced foundational work on the specification, analysis and component configuration of software architectures, including the development of associated software tools. However, adoption of the research by industry has been largely methodological rather than based on precise specifications in architecture description languages (ADLs) or rigorously underpinned by formal models of behaviour and non-functional attributes. Why is this? Why were the actual formalisms and tools not more widely adopted? Can we draw any lessons from this? In this talk, I hope to explore this further, drawing on my personal experience as a researcher in distributed software architectures. I particularly hope to tickle the fancy of the younger members of our community, indicating the excitement of research, the benefits of belonging to a vibrant research community such as ours, and the benefits of being an active contributor. For the more mature researchers, there will be some nostalgic memories combined with some inevitable stepping on toes. For both young and old, there will be some thoughts for research opportunities as the need for self-managing adaptive software systems becomes more urgent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the ICSE 2023 Program Co-Chairs Message from the ICSE 2022 Program Chairs Message from the ICSE 2022 General Chair Multi-Objective Regression Test Selection On the Interplay Between Static and Dynamic Analysis for Mining Sandboxes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1