在巴塞罗那诊所肝癌 A/B 期肝细胞癌中,超越米兰标准的七-十一标准优化了手术切除的生存获益。

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Liver Cancer Pub Date : 2023-01-19 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1159/000529143
Chian-Tzu Huang, Yu-Long Chu, Tung-Hung Su, Shang-Chin Huang, Tai-Chung Tseng, Shih-Jer Hsu, Sih-Han Liao, Chun-Ming Hong, Chen-Hua Liu, Hung-Chih Yang, Chun-Jen Liu, Pei-Jer Chen, Jia-Horng Kao
{"title":"在巴塞罗那诊所肝癌 A/B 期肝细胞癌中,超越米兰标准的七-十一标准优化了手术切除的生存获益。","authors":"Chian-Tzu Huang, Yu-Long Chu, Tung-Hung Su, Shang-Chin Huang, Tai-Chung Tseng, Shih-Jer Hsu, Sih-Han Liao, Chun-Ming Hong, Chen-Hua Liu, Hung-Chih Yang, Chun-Jen Liu, Pei-Jer Chen, Jia-Horng Kao","doi":"10.1159/000529143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria is in debate. We aimed to identify candidates for surgical resection (SR) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria at the National Taiwan University Hospital during 2005 and 2019 were screened, and those who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or SR were consecutively included. The tumor burden was classified by the seven-eleven criteria into low (≤7), intermediate (7-11), or high (>11). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 474 patients who received SR (<i>n</i> = 247) and TACE (<i>n</i> = 227) were enrolled. Patients who underwent SR were significantly younger with better liver reserve. There were 76 (31%) and 129 (57%) deaths in the SR and TACE groups after a median follow-up of 3.9 and 2.1 years, respectively. The seven-eleven criteria could distinguish median overall survival (OS) among low (<i>n</i> = 149), intermediate (<i>n</i> = 203), and high (<i>n</i> = 122) tumor burden groups (7.7 vs. 6.9 vs. 2.8 years, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients receiving SR had a significantly higher median OS compared with TACE in those with intermediate (8.2 vs. 2.6 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and high (5.6 vs. 1.5 years, <i>p</i> = 0.001) tumor burden. After adjustment for age, sex, and liver reserve, SR was predictive for better OS in intermediate (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.75) and high tumor burden groups (aHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32-0.92). The survival benefit of SR especially confines to patients within 3 tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with tumor burden beyond the up-to-7 criteria but within 3 tumors, SR has better OS than TACE and should be considered in resectable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Survival Benefit by Surgical Resection by the Seven-Eleven Criteria in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A/B Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond the Milan Criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Chian-Tzu Huang, Yu-Long Chu, Tung-Hung Su, Shang-Chin Huang, Tai-Chung Tseng, Shih-Jer Hsu, Sih-Han Liao, Chun-Ming Hong, Chen-Hua Liu, Hung-Chih Yang, Chun-Jen Liu, Pei-Jer Chen, Jia-Horng Kao\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000529143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria is in debate. We aimed to identify candidates for surgical resection (SR) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with survival benefit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria at the National Taiwan University Hospital during 2005 and 2019 were screened, and those who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or SR were consecutively included. The tumor burden was classified by the seven-eleven criteria into low (≤7), intermediate (7-11), or high (>11). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 474 patients who received SR (<i>n</i> = 247) and TACE (<i>n</i> = 227) were enrolled. Patients who underwent SR were significantly younger with better liver reserve. There were 76 (31%) and 129 (57%) deaths in the SR and TACE groups after a median follow-up of 3.9 and 2.1 years, respectively. The seven-eleven criteria could distinguish median overall survival (OS) among low (<i>n</i> = 149), intermediate (<i>n</i> = 203), and high (<i>n</i> = 122) tumor burden groups (7.7 vs. 6.9 vs. 2.8 years, respectively, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Patients receiving SR had a significantly higher median OS compared with TACE in those with intermediate (8.2 vs. 2.6 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and high (5.6 vs. 1.5 years, <i>p</i> = 0.001) tumor burden. After adjustment for age, sex, and liver reserve, SR was predictive for better OS in intermediate (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.75) and high tumor burden groups (aHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32-0.92). The survival benefit of SR especially confines to patients within 3 tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with tumor burden beyond the up-to-7 criteria but within 3 tumors, SR has better OS than TACE and should be considered in resectable patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529143\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:对于超越米兰标准的肝细胞癌(HCC)的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。我们的目的是为超出米兰标准的巴塞罗那肝癌(BCLC)-A/B HCC患者确定手术切除(SR)的候选者,并使其生存获益:方法:筛选2005年至2019年期间在台湾大学医院接受经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)或SR治疗的超出米兰标准的BCLC-A/B HCC患者。肿瘤负荷按七-十一标准分为低(≤7)、中(7-11)和高(>11)。采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归分析预测结果:共有474名患者接受了SR(247人)和TACE(227人)治疗。接受SR治疗的患者明显更年轻,肝脏储备能力更强。在中位随访3.9年和2.1年后,SR组和TACE组分别有76人(31%)和129人(57%)死亡。七-十一项标准可区分低肿瘤负荷组(149 人)、中肿瘤负荷组(203 人)和高肿瘤负荷组(122 人)的中位总生存期(OS)(分别为 7.7 年 vs. 6.9 年 vs. 2.8 年,P < 0.001)。与TACE相比,中度(8.2年对2.6年,p < 0.001)和高度(5.6年对1.5年,p = 0.001)肿瘤负荷组患者接受SR治疗的中位OS明显更高。在对年龄、性别和肝储备进行调整后,SR可预测中度肿瘤负荷组(调整后危险比[aHR]:0.45,95% 置信区间[CI]:0.27-0.75)和高度肿瘤负荷组(aHR:0.54,95% CI:0.32-0.92)更好的OS。SR的生存获益尤其局限于3个肿瘤以内的患者:结论:对于超过米兰标准的 BCLC-A/B HCC 患者,肿瘤负荷超过至多 7 个标准但不超过 3 个肿瘤,SR 的 OS 优于 TACE,可切除的患者应考虑使用 SR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimizing Survival Benefit by Surgical Resection by the Seven-Eleven Criteria in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A/B Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond the Milan Criteria.

Introduction: Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria is in debate. We aimed to identify candidates for surgical resection (SR) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with survival benefit.

Methods: Patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria at the National Taiwan University Hospital during 2005 and 2019 were screened, and those who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or SR were consecutively included. The tumor burden was classified by the seven-eleven criteria into low (≤7), intermediate (7-11), or high (>11). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used for outcome prediction.

Results: Overall, 474 patients who received SR (n = 247) and TACE (n = 227) were enrolled. Patients who underwent SR were significantly younger with better liver reserve. There were 76 (31%) and 129 (57%) deaths in the SR and TACE groups after a median follow-up of 3.9 and 2.1 years, respectively. The seven-eleven criteria could distinguish median overall survival (OS) among low (n = 149), intermediate (n = 203), and high (n = 122) tumor burden groups (7.7 vs. 6.9 vs. 2.8 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients receiving SR had a significantly higher median OS compared with TACE in those with intermediate (8.2 vs. 2.6 years, p < 0.001) and high (5.6 vs. 1.5 years, p = 0.001) tumor burden. After adjustment for age, sex, and liver reserve, SR was predictive for better OS in intermediate (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.75) and high tumor burden groups (aHR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32-0.92). The survival benefit of SR especially confines to patients within 3 tumors.

Conclusions: In patients with BCLC-A/B HCC beyond the Milan criteria with tumor burden beyond the up-to-7 criteria but within 3 tumors, SR has better OS than TACE and should be considered in resectable patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver Cancer
Liver Cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
7.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Liver Cancer is a journal that serves the international community of researchers and clinicians by providing a platform for research results related to the causes, mechanisms, and therapy of liver cancer. It focuses on molecular carcinogenesis, prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment, including molecular targeted therapy. The journal publishes clinical and translational research in the field of liver cancer in both humans and experimental models. It publishes original and review articles and has an Impact Factor of 13.8. The journal is indexed and abstracted in various platforms including PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, Google Scholar, DOAJ, Chemical Abstracts Service, Scopus, Embase, Pathway Studio, and WorldCat.
期刊最新文献
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab: A Novel First-Line Combination Immunotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Neratinib Alone or in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with or without mTOR Inhibitors in Patients with Fibrolamellar Carcinoma Erratum. Prognostic Efficacy of the Albumin-Bilirubin Score and Treatment Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Large-Scale, Multi-Center Real-World Database Study LI-RADS category can be a post-surgical prognostic factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1