对大型DNS服务的被动观察:Google生命中的2.5年

W. D. Vries, R. V. Rijswijk-Deij, P. Boer, A. Pras
{"title":"对大型DNS服务的被动观察:Google生命中的2.5年","authors":"W. D. Vries, R. V. Rijswijk-Deij, P. Boer, A. Pras","doi":"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009 Google launched its Public DNS service, with its characteristic IP address 8.8.8.8. Since then, this service has grown to be the largest and most well-known DNS service in existence. The popularity of public DNS services has been disruptive for Content Delivery Networks (CDNs). CDNs rely on IP information to geo-Iocate clients. This no longer works in the presence of public resolvers, which led to the introduction of the EDNSO Client Subnet extension. ECS allows resolvers to reveal part of a client's IP address to authoritative name servers and helps CDNs pinpoint client origin. A useful side effect of ECS is that it can be used to study the workings of public DNS resolvers. In this paper, we leverage this side effect of ECS to study Google Public DNS. From a dataset of 3.7 billion DNS queries spanning 2.5 years, we extract ECS information and perform a longitudinal analysis of which clients are served from which Point-of-Presence. Our study focuses on two aspects of GPDNS. First, we show that while GPDNS has PoPs in many countries, traffic is frequently routed out of country, even if that was not necessary. Often this reduces performance, and perhaps more importantly, exposes DNS requests to state-level surveillance. Second, we study how GPDNS is used by clients. We show that end-users switch to GPDNS en masse when their ISP's DNS service is unresponsive, and do not switch back. We also find that many e-mail providers configure GPDNS as the resolver for their servers. This raises serious privacy concerns, as DNS queries from mail servers reveal information about hosts they exchange mail with. Because of GPDNS's use of ECS, this sensitive information is not only revealed to Google, but also to any operator of an authoritative name server that receives ECS-enabled queries from GPDNS during the lookup process.","PeriodicalId":6607,"journal":{"name":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","volume":"156 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passive Observations of a Large DNS Service: 2.5 Years in the Life of Google\",\"authors\":\"W. D. Vries, R. V. Rijswijk-Deij, P. Boer, A. Pras\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/TMA.2018.8506536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2009 Google launched its Public DNS service, with its characteristic IP address 8.8.8.8. Since then, this service has grown to be the largest and most well-known DNS service in existence. The popularity of public DNS services has been disruptive for Content Delivery Networks (CDNs). CDNs rely on IP information to geo-Iocate clients. This no longer works in the presence of public resolvers, which led to the introduction of the EDNSO Client Subnet extension. ECS allows resolvers to reveal part of a client's IP address to authoritative name servers and helps CDNs pinpoint client origin. A useful side effect of ECS is that it can be used to study the workings of public DNS resolvers. In this paper, we leverage this side effect of ECS to study Google Public DNS. From a dataset of 3.7 billion DNS queries spanning 2.5 years, we extract ECS information and perform a longitudinal analysis of which clients are served from which Point-of-Presence. Our study focuses on two aspects of GPDNS. First, we show that while GPDNS has PoPs in many countries, traffic is frequently routed out of country, even if that was not necessary. Often this reduces performance, and perhaps more importantly, exposes DNS requests to state-level surveillance. Second, we study how GPDNS is used by clients. We show that end-users switch to GPDNS en masse when their ISP's DNS service is unresponsive, and do not switch back. We also find that many e-mail providers configure GPDNS as the resolver for their servers. This raises serious privacy concerns, as DNS queries from mail servers reveal information about hosts they exchange mail with. Because of GPDNS's use of ECS, this sensitive information is not only revealed to Google, but also to any operator of an authoritative name server that receives ECS-enabled queries from GPDNS during the lookup process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2018.8506536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

2009年,谷歌推出了其公共DNS服务,其特色IP地址为8.8.8.8。从那时起,该服务已发展成为现存最大和最知名的DNS服务。公共DNS服务的普及给内容分发网络(cdn)带来了颠覆性影响。cdn依靠IP信息对客户端进行地理定位。这在存在公共解析器的情况下不再有效,这导致引入了EDNSO客户机子网扩展。ECS允许解析器向权威名称服务器显示客户端IP地址的一部分,并帮助cdn查明客户端来源。ECS的一个有用的副作用是,它可以用于研究公共DNS解析器的工作。在本文中,我们利用ECS的这一副作用来研究谷歌公共DNS。从历时2.5年的37亿次DNS查询数据集中,我们提取了ECS信息,并对哪些客户从哪个存在点获得服务进行了纵向分析。我们的研究主要集中在GPDNS的两个方面。首先,我们表明,虽然GPDNS在许多国家都有pop,但流量经常被路由到国家之外,即使这是不必要的。这通常会降低性能,也许更重要的是,将DNS请求暴露给国家级别的监视。其次,我们研究GPDNS是如何被客户端使用的。我们表明,当他们的ISP的DNS服务没有响应时,最终用户会大量切换到GPDNS,并且不会切换回来。我们还发现,许多电子邮件提供商将GPDNS配置为其服务器的解析器。这引起了严重的隐私问题,因为来自邮件服务器的DNS查询会泄露与它们交换邮件的主机的信息。由于GPDNS使用ECS,这些敏感信息不仅会泄露给Google,还会泄露给在查找过程中从GPDNS接收启用ECS的查询的权威名称服务器的任何运营商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Passive Observations of a Large DNS Service: 2.5 Years in the Life of Google
In 2009 Google launched its Public DNS service, with its characteristic IP address 8.8.8.8. Since then, this service has grown to be the largest and most well-known DNS service in existence. The popularity of public DNS services has been disruptive for Content Delivery Networks (CDNs). CDNs rely on IP information to geo-Iocate clients. This no longer works in the presence of public resolvers, which led to the introduction of the EDNSO Client Subnet extension. ECS allows resolvers to reveal part of a client's IP address to authoritative name servers and helps CDNs pinpoint client origin. A useful side effect of ECS is that it can be used to study the workings of public DNS resolvers. In this paper, we leverage this side effect of ECS to study Google Public DNS. From a dataset of 3.7 billion DNS queries spanning 2.5 years, we extract ECS information and perform a longitudinal analysis of which clients are served from which Point-of-Presence. Our study focuses on two aspects of GPDNS. First, we show that while GPDNS has PoPs in many countries, traffic is frequently routed out of country, even if that was not necessary. Often this reduces performance, and perhaps more importantly, exposes DNS requests to state-level surveillance. Second, we study how GPDNS is used by clients. We show that end-users switch to GPDNS en masse when their ISP's DNS service is unresponsive, and do not switch back. We also find that many e-mail providers configure GPDNS as the resolver for their servers. This raises serious privacy concerns, as DNS queries from mail servers reveal information about hosts they exchange mail with. Because of GPDNS's use of ECS, this sensitive information is not only revealed to Google, but also to any operator of an authoritative name server that receives ECS-enabled queries from GPDNS during the lookup process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Analysis of Network Measurements Through Machine Learning: The Power of the Crowd App for Dynamic Crowdsourced QoE Studies of HTTP Adaptive Streaming on Mobile Devices Dmap: Automating Domain Name Ecosystem Measurements and Applications Anycaston the Move: A Look at Mobile Anycast Performance A Second Screen Journey to the Cup: Twitter Dynamics During the Stanley Cup Playoffs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1