创业导向对组织内部的影响:发明激情与组织认同的作用

IF 0.7 Q4 MANAGEMENT Irish Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1177/01492063231177232
Sebastian C. Schuh, Tae-Yeol Kim, Xing Wang, Zhiqiang Liu
{"title":"创业导向对组织内部的影响:发明激情与组织认同的作用","authors":"Sebastian C. Schuh, Tae-Yeol Kim, Xing Wang, Zhiqiang Liu","doi":"10.1177/01492063231177232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, entrepreneurial orientation (EO) has emerged as a key concept in the management literature, with various studies demonstrating its positive effects on important firm-level outcomes. However, our understanding of whether and how EO shapes dynamics within organizations is still underdeveloped. Thus, by integrating EO and social information–processing theories, this study develops and tests a cross-level contingency model that describes how and when EO cascades through an organization—bridging firm, supervisor, and employee levels. We conducted a three-source, three-wave study involving 280 supervisors and 1,214 employees from 94 organizations to test our model. The results show that firm-level EO is positively related to employees’ creative performance and that supervisors’ and employees’ passion for inventing serves as the central serial mediators for these links. The results also reveal that these cascading effects of EO do not occur unconditionally but depend on an important boundary condition—that is, the extent to which supervisors identify with their organizations. A follow-up study of 238 supervisors from various firms provides further support for the social information–processing perspective of our model. It shows that the link between firm EO and supervisors’ passion for inventing is mediated by perceived normative expectations for creativity. Taken together, these findings offer a new perspective on the internal dynamics of EO, uncover a crucial boundary condition, and provide insights for the effective implementation of EO.","PeriodicalId":52018,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Management","volume":"240 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation Within Organizations: The Role of Passion for Inventing and Organizational Identification\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian C. Schuh, Tae-Yeol Kim, Xing Wang, Zhiqiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01492063231177232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, entrepreneurial orientation (EO) has emerged as a key concept in the management literature, with various studies demonstrating its positive effects on important firm-level outcomes. However, our understanding of whether and how EO shapes dynamics within organizations is still underdeveloped. Thus, by integrating EO and social information–processing theories, this study develops and tests a cross-level contingency model that describes how and when EO cascades through an organization—bridging firm, supervisor, and employee levels. We conducted a three-source, three-wave study involving 280 supervisors and 1,214 employees from 94 organizations to test our model. The results show that firm-level EO is positively related to employees’ creative performance and that supervisors’ and employees’ passion for inventing serves as the central serial mediators for these links. The results also reveal that these cascading effects of EO do not occur unconditionally but depend on an important boundary condition—that is, the extent to which supervisors identify with their organizations. A follow-up study of 238 supervisors from various firms provides further support for the social information–processing perspective of our model. It shows that the link between firm EO and supervisors’ passion for inventing is mediated by perceived normative expectations for creativity. Taken together, these findings offer a new perspective on the internal dynamics of EO, uncover a crucial boundary condition, and provide insights for the effective implementation of EO.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"240 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231177232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231177232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,创业导向(EO)已经成为管理学文献中的一个关键概念,各种研究都证明了它对重要的公司层面结果的积极影响。然而,我们对企业绩效是否以及如何塑造组织内部动态的理解仍然不够充分。因此,通过整合企业绩效和社会信息处理理论,本研究开发并测试了一个跨层次的权变模型,该模型描述了企业绩效如何以及何时通过组织桥梁企业、主管和员工层面进行级联。我们进行了一项三源、三波的研究,涉及来自94个组织的280名主管和1,214名员工来测试我们的模型。研究结果表明,企业层面的创新绩效与员工的创新绩效呈正相关,而主管和员工的创新热情在这些联系中起着中心的串行中介作用。研究结果还表明,行政管理的这些级联效应并不是无条件发生的,而是取决于一个重要的边界条件,即主管对其组织的认同程度。对238名来自不同企业的监事的后续研究进一步支持了该模型的社会信息加工视角。研究表明,企业绩效与主管发明激情之间的联系是通过对创造力的感知规范性期望来中介的。综上所述,这些发现为研究行政管理的内部动态提供了一个新的视角,揭示了一个关键的边界条件,并为有效实施行政管理提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation Within Organizations: The Role of Passion for Inventing and Organizational Identification
In recent years, entrepreneurial orientation (EO) has emerged as a key concept in the management literature, with various studies demonstrating its positive effects on important firm-level outcomes. However, our understanding of whether and how EO shapes dynamics within organizations is still underdeveloped. Thus, by integrating EO and social information–processing theories, this study develops and tests a cross-level contingency model that describes how and when EO cascades through an organization—bridging firm, supervisor, and employee levels. We conducted a three-source, three-wave study involving 280 supervisors and 1,214 employees from 94 organizations to test our model. The results show that firm-level EO is positively related to employees’ creative performance and that supervisors’ and employees’ passion for inventing serves as the central serial mediators for these links. The results also reveal that these cascading effects of EO do not occur unconditionally but depend on an important boundary condition—that is, the extent to which supervisors identify with their organizations. A follow-up study of 238 supervisors from various firms provides further support for the social information–processing perspective of our model. It shows that the link between firm EO and supervisors’ passion for inventing is mediated by perceived normative expectations for creativity. Taken together, these findings offer a new perspective on the internal dynamics of EO, uncover a crucial boundary condition, and provide insights for the effective implementation of EO.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Mental health disclosure in the workplace – An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the employee experience Oh the Anxiety! The Anxiety of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality and Mitigating Effects of Ethical Leadership Give Peace a Chance? How Regulatory Foci Influence Organizational Conflict Events in Intractable Conflict Environments Geographic Distance and State's Grip: Information Asymmetry, State Inattention, and Firm Implementation of State Policy From Home to Corner Office: How Work–Life Programs Influence Women's Managerial Representation in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1