{"title":"整骨疗法创始人的感召与当代整骨疗法职业认同的问题:专题分析","authors":"Daniel Skinner , Thomas Esber , Stevan Walkowski","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>As contemporary osteopathy is increasingly mainstreamed into the broader field of American medicine, it is important to understand how osteopathic physicians’ professional identities are shaped, from medical education to practice. This study examines the way in which osteopathic professionals negotiate their identities in relation to the ideas and legacy of osteopathy’s 19 th century founder, Dr. Andrew Taylor Still.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A thematic analysis of ten years of articles from the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine allowed the researchers to examine themes arising in the dataset, which in turn served as the basis for a thematic distillation of how those themes illuminate negotiations of osteopathic professional identity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>JOM authors evoked Still for several reasons. First, decontextualized “name-checking” served to ground investigations into osteopathic principles and skills in osteopathic history. Second, authors evoke Still’s name and influence on the early profession to negotiate a range of contemporary questions, from identity to </span>health policy. Within this second category, this study finds that American osteopaths engage in a speculative practice about what Still would or would not think about contemporary osteopathic medical education and practice.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>If osteopathy is concerned with training future generations of practitioners who will continue the traditions that have distinguished osteopathy from mainstream medicine, then understanding its history is an essential step toward professional self-understanding. This study suggests that a close look at how American osteopathic medical professionals relate to Still reveals a great deal, not only about the education and practice of osteopathy, but professional identity formation generally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evocations of Osteopathy's founder and questions for contemporary osteopathic professional identity: A thematic analysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Skinner , Thomas Esber , Stevan Walkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>As contemporary osteopathy is increasingly mainstreamed into the broader field of American medicine, it is important to understand how osteopathic physicians’ professional identities are shaped, from medical education to practice. This study examines the way in which osteopathic professionals negotiate their identities in relation to the ideas and legacy of osteopathy’s 19 th century founder, Dr. Andrew Taylor Still.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A thematic analysis of ten years of articles from the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine allowed the researchers to examine themes arising in the dataset, which in turn served as the basis for a thematic distillation of how those themes illuminate negotiations of osteopathic professional identity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>JOM authors evoked Still for several reasons. First, decontextualized “name-checking” served to ground investigations into osteopathic principles and skills in osteopathic history. Second, authors evoke Still’s name and influence on the early profession to negotiate a range of contemporary questions, from identity to </span>health policy. Within this second category, this study finds that American osteopaths engage in a speculative practice about what Still would or would not think about contemporary osteopathic medical education and practice.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>If osteopathy is concerned with training future generations of practitioners who will continue the traditions that have distinguished osteopathy from mainstream medicine, then understanding its history is an essential step toward professional self-understanding. This study suggests that a close look at how American osteopathic medical professionals relate to Still reveals a great deal, not only about the education and practice of osteopathy, but professional identity formation generally.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068922000670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068922000670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
随着当代整骨疗法日益成为美国医学更广泛领域的主流,从医学教育到实践,了解整骨疗法医生的职业身份是如何形成的是很重要的。本研究考察了整骨疗法专业人员与19世纪整骨疗法创始人安德鲁·泰勒·斯蒂尔博士的思想和遗产有关的身份协商方式。方法:对《骨科医学杂志》(Journal of Osteopathic Medicine) 10年来的文章进行专题分析,使研究人员能够检查数据集中出现的主题,这些主题反过来又作为主题提炼的基础,揭示这些主题如何阐明骨科专业身份的谈判。结果jom作者引用Still有几个原因。首先,去语境化的“姓名检查”有助于对整骨疗法的原理和整骨疗法历史中的技能进行基础调查。其次,作者利用斯蒂尔的名字及其对早期职业的影响,来讨论一系列当代问题,从身份认同到卫生政策。在第二种情况下,本研究发现,美国整骨医生从事一种思考性的实践,即斯蒂尔对当代整骨医学教育和实践的看法。如果整骨疗法关注的是培养下一代的从业者,他们将继续将整骨疗法与主流医学区分开来的传统,那么了解它的历史是走向专业自我理解的重要一步。这项研究表明,仔细观察美国整骨疗法医学专业人员与斯蒂尔的关系,不仅可以了解整骨疗法的教育和实践,还可以了解整个职业身份的形成。
Evocations of Osteopathy's founder and questions for contemporary osteopathic professional identity: A thematic analysis
Introduction
As contemporary osteopathy is increasingly mainstreamed into the broader field of American medicine, it is important to understand how osteopathic physicians’ professional identities are shaped, from medical education to practice. This study examines the way in which osteopathic professionals negotiate their identities in relation to the ideas and legacy of osteopathy’s 19 th century founder, Dr. Andrew Taylor Still.
Methods
A thematic analysis of ten years of articles from the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine allowed the researchers to examine themes arising in the dataset, which in turn served as the basis for a thematic distillation of how those themes illuminate negotiations of osteopathic professional identity.
Results
JOM authors evoked Still for several reasons. First, decontextualized “name-checking” served to ground investigations into osteopathic principles and skills in osteopathic history. Second, authors evoke Still’s name and influence on the early profession to negotiate a range of contemporary questions, from identity to health policy. Within this second category, this study finds that American osteopaths engage in a speculative practice about what Still would or would not think about contemporary osteopathic medical education and practice.
Discussion
If osteopathy is concerned with training future generations of practitioners who will continue the traditions that have distinguished osteopathy from mainstream medicine, then understanding its history is an essential step toward professional self-understanding. This study suggests that a close look at how American osteopathic medical professionals relate to Still reveals a great deal, not only about the education and practice of osteopathy, but professional identity formation generally.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine.
The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.