整骨疗法创始人的感召与当代整骨疗法职业认同的问题:专题分析

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.08.001
Daniel Skinner , Thomas Esber , Stevan Walkowski
{"title":"整骨疗法创始人的感召与当代整骨疗法职业认同的问题:专题分析","authors":"Daniel Skinner ,&nbsp;Thomas Esber ,&nbsp;Stevan Walkowski","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>As contemporary osteopathy is increasingly mainstreamed into the broader field of American medicine, it is important to understand how osteopathic physicians’ professional identities are shaped, from medical education to practice. This study examines the way in which osteopathic professionals negotiate their identities in relation to the ideas and legacy of osteopathy’s 19 th century founder, Dr. Andrew Taylor Still.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A thematic analysis of ten years of articles from the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine allowed the researchers to examine themes arising in the dataset, which in turn served as the basis for a thematic distillation of how those themes illuminate negotiations of osteopathic professional identity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>JOM authors evoked Still for several reasons. First, decontextualized “name-checking” served to ground investigations into osteopathic principles and skills in osteopathic history. Second, authors evoke Still’s name and influence on the early profession to negotiate a range of contemporary questions, from identity to </span>health policy. Within this second category, this study finds that American osteopaths engage in a speculative practice about what Still would or would not think about contemporary osteopathic medical education and practice.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>If osteopathy is concerned with training future generations of practitioners who will continue the traditions that have distinguished osteopathy from mainstream medicine, then understanding its history is an essential step toward professional self-understanding. This study suggests that a close look at how American osteopathic medical professionals relate to Still reveals a great deal, not only about the education and practice of osteopathy, but professional identity formation generally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evocations of Osteopathy's founder and questions for contemporary osteopathic professional identity: A thematic analysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Skinner ,&nbsp;Thomas Esber ,&nbsp;Stevan Walkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>As contemporary osteopathy is increasingly mainstreamed into the broader field of American medicine, it is important to understand how osteopathic physicians’ professional identities are shaped, from medical education to practice. This study examines the way in which osteopathic professionals negotiate their identities in relation to the ideas and legacy of osteopathy’s 19 th century founder, Dr. Andrew Taylor Still.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A thematic analysis of ten years of articles from the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine allowed the researchers to examine themes arising in the dataset, which in turn served as the basis for a thematic distillation of how those themes illuminate negotiations of osteopathic professional identity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>JOM authors evoked Still for several reasons. First, decontextualized “name-checking” served to ground investigations into osteopathic principles and skills in osteopathic history. Second, authors evoke Still’s name and influence on the early profession to negotiate a range of contemporary questions, from identity to </span>health policy. Within this second category, this study finds that American osteopaths engage in a speculative practice about what Still would or would not think about contemporary osteopathic medical education and practice.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>If osteopathy is concerned with training future generations of practitioners who will continue the traditions that have distinguished osteopathy from mainstream medicine, then understanding its history is an essential step toward professional self-understanding. This study suggests that a close look at how American osteopathic medical professionals relate to Still reveals a great deal, not only about the education and practice of osteopathy, but professional identity formation generally.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068922000670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068922000670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

随着当代整骨疗法日益成为美国医学更广泛领域的主流,从医学教育到实践,了解整骨疗法医生的职业身份是如何形成的是很重要的。本研究考察了整骨疗法专业人员与19世纪整骨疗法创始人安德鲁·泰勒·斯蒂尔博士的思想和遗产有关的身份协商方式。方法:对《骨科医学杂志》(Journal of Osteopathic Medicine) 10年来的文章进行专题分析,使研究人员能够检查数据集中出现的主题,这些主题反过来又作为主题提炼的基础,揭示这些主题如何阐明骨科专业身份的谈判。结果jom作者引用Still有几个原因。首先,去语境化的“姓名检查”有助于对整骨疗法的原理和整骨疗法历史中的技能进行基础调查。其次,作者利用斯蒂尔的名字及其对早期职业的影响,来讨论一系列当代问题,从身份认同到卫生政策。在第二种情况下,本研究发现,美国整骨医生从事一种思考性的实践,即斯蒂尔对当代整骨医学教育和实践的看法。如果整骨疗法关注的是培养下一代的从业者,他们将继续将整骨疗法与主流医学区分开来的传统,那么了解它的历史是走向专业自我理解的重要一步。这项研究表明,仔细观察美国整骨疗法医学专业人员与斯蒂尔的关系,不仅可以了解整骨疗法的教育和实践,还可以了解整个职业身份的形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evocations of Osteopathy's founder and questions for contemporary osteopathic professional identity: A thematic analysis

Introduction

As contemporary osteopathy is increasingly mainstreamed into the broader field of American medicine, it is important to understand how osteopathic physicians’ professional identities are shaped, from medical education to practice. This study examines the way in which osteopathic professionals negotiate their identities in relation to the ideas and legacy of osteopathy’s 19 th century founder, Dr. Andrew Taylor Still.

Methods

A thematic analysis of ten years of articles from the Journal of Osteopathic Medicine allowed the researchers to examine themes arising in the dataset, which in turn served as the basis for a thematic distillation of how those themes illuminate negotiations of osteopathic professional identity.

Results

JOM authors evoked Still for several reasons. First, decontextualized “name-checking” served to ground investigations into osteopathic principles and skills in osteopathic history. Second, authors evoke Still’s name and influence on the early profession to negotiate a range of contemporary questions, from identity to health policy. Within this second category, this study finds that American osteopaths engage in a speculative practice about what Still would or would not think about contemporary osteopathic medical education and practice.

Discussion

If osteopathy is concerned with training future generations of practitioners who will continue the traditions that have distinguished osteopathy from mainstream medicine, then understanding its history is an essential step toward professional self-understanding. This study suggests that a close look at how American osteopathic medical professionals relate to Still reveals a great deal, not only about the education and practice of osteopathy, but professional identity formation generally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Osteopathic manual treatment in women with endometriosis: A scoping review on clinical symptoms, fertility and quality of life The effectiveness of neuromuscular spinal manipulation- an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Osteopathic treatment of a person with Arnold-Chiari malformation and Syringomyelia: A case report Is visceral osteopathy therapy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis Professional skill priorities: Comparison views of osteopathy industry professionals and osteopathy students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1