简单换能器网络的公平性决定确定性

IF 2.2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Database Systems Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI:10.1145/2757215
Tom J. Ameloot
{"title":"简单换能器网络的公平性决定确定性","authors":"Tom J. Ameloot","doi":"10.1145/2757215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A distributed database system often operates in an asynchronous communication model where messages can be arbitrarily delayed. This communication model causes nondeterministic effects like unpredictable arrival orders of messages. Nonetheless, in general we want the distributed system to be deterministic; the system should produce the same output despite the nondeterministic effects on messages.\n Previously, two interpretations of determinism have been proposed. The first says that all infinite fair computation traces produce the same output. The second interpretation is a confluence notion, saying that all finite computation traces can still be extended to produce the same output. A decidability result for the confluence notion was previously obtained for so-called simple transducer networks, a model from the field of declarative networking. In the current article, we also present a decidability result for simple transducer networks, but this time for the first interpretation of determinism, with infinite fair computation traces. We also compare the expressivity of simple transducer networks under both interpretations.","PeriodicalId":50915,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems","volume":"2 1","pages":"9:1-9:39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deciding Determinism with Fairness for Simple Transducer Networks\",\"authors\":\"Tom J. Ameloot\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2757215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A distributed database system often operates in an asynchronous communication model where messages can be arbitrarily delayed. This communication model causes nondeterministic effects like unpredictable arrival orders of messages. Nonetheless, in general we want the distributed system to be deterministic; the system should produce the same output despite the nondeterministic effects on messages.\\n Previously, two interpretations of determinism have been proposed. The first says that all infinite fair computation traces produce the same output. The second interpretation is a confluence notion, saying that all finite computation traces can still be extended to produce the same output. A decidability result for the confluence notion was previously obtained for so-called simple transducer networks, a model from the field of declarative networking. In the current article, we also present a decidability result for simple transducer networks, but this time for the first interpretation of determinism, with infinite fair computation traces. We also compare the expressivity of simple transducer networks under both interpretations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Database Systems\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"9:1-9:39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Database Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2757215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2757215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分布式数据库系统通常在异步通信模型中运行,其中消息可以任意延迟。这种通信模型会导致不确定的影响,比如消息的到达顺序不可预测。尽管如此,通常我们希望分布式系统是确定性的;尽管对消息有不确定性的影响,系统应该产生相同的输出。此前,人们对决定论提出了两种解释。第一个说所有无限的公平计算轨迹产生相同的输出。第二种解释是合流概念,即所有有限的计算轨迹仍然可以扩展以产生相同的输出。对于所谓的简单换能器网络(一种来自声明性网络领域的模型),先前已经获得了合流概念的可判定结果。在当前的文章中,我们也给出了简单换能器网络的可判决性结果,但这一次是决定论的第一次解释,具有无限公平的计算痕迹。我们还比较了两种解释下简单换能器网络的表达能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deciding Determinism with Fairness for Simple Transducer Networks
A distributed database system often operates in an asynchronous communication model where messages can be arbitrarily delayed. This communication model causes nondeterministic effects like unpredictable arrival orders of messages. Nonetheless, in general we want the distributed system to be deterministic; the system should produce the same output despite the nondeterministic effects on messages. Previously, two interpretations of determinism have been proposed. The first says that all infinite fair computation traces produce the same output. The second interpretation is a confluence notion, saying that all finite computation traces can still be extended to produce the same output. A decidability result for the confluence notion was previously obtained for so-called simple transducer networks, a model from the field of declarative networking. In the current article, we also present a decidability result for simple transducer networks, but this time for the first interpretation of determinism, with infinite fair computation traces. We also compare the expressivity of simple transducer networks under both interpretations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
ACM Transactions on Database Systems 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heavily used in both academic and corporate R&D settings, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) is a key publication for computer scientists working in data abstraction, data modeling, and designing data management systems. Topics include storage and retrieval, transaction management, distributed and federated databases, semantics of data, intelligent databases, and operations and algorithms relating to these areas. In this rapidly changing field, TODS provides insights into the thoughts of the best minds in database R&D.
期刊最新文献
Automated Category Tree Construction: Hardness Bounds and Algorithms Database Repairing with Soft Functional Dependencies Sharing Queries with Nonequivalent User-Defined Aggregate Functions A family of centrality measures for graph data based on subgraphs GraphZeppelin: How to Find Connected Components (Even When Graphs Are Dense, Dynamic, and Massive)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1