政治学中的具体多样性倡议:教师工作量干预计划

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Ps-Political Science & Politics Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI:10.1017/S1049096522000877
Heather Stoll, Michele McLaughlin-Zamora, Sarah E. Anderson
{"title":"政治学中的具体多样性倡议:教师工作量干预计划","authors":"Heather Stoll, Michele McLaughlin-Zamora, Sarah E. Anderson","doi":"10.1017/S1049096522000877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, racial justice protests, and the #MeToo Movement, highlighted the various ways that systemic racism and sexism persist in academia. Underrepresentation, obstacles to career advancement, and difficult department climates persist for women and underrepresented minority (URM) faculty, despite what we know now about this “leaky pipeline” (American Political Science Association 2004). Political science is no exception. In 2020, the American Political Science Association (APSA) renewed its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) (American Political Science Association 2020). However, as discussed in Reinhardt and King’s introduction to this symposium, the political science profession remains one of the most maleand white-dominated social science fields (Mershon and Walsh 2016; Michelson and Monforti 2021). Inequities in faculty workloads are one principal source of the leaky faculty pipeline. Vital to the functioning of institutions of higher education, service and mentoring are both major elements of faculty workloads. However, these work activities have been shown to be disproportionately undertaken by women and historically marginalized groups. Although the literature currently does not offer a satisfactory explanation for these observed workload inequities, it is unambiguous about the negative consequences for a host of outcomes, ranging from department climate to retention to advancement through the ranks of the professoriate. Unfortunately, and complicatingAPSA’smission to address systemic inequity, few programs exist that attempt evidencebased interventions. To move the disciplinary conversation forward and to add a tool to the resources of political science departments, this article describes a faculty workload intervention program based on O’Meara et al.’s (2018) Faculty Workloads and Rewards Project (FWRP) that also includes the work activity area of mentoring. Here, we apply this program to a hypothetical political science department. This workload intervention program currently is being implemented at four pilot departments across the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) campus, with funding from theUniversity of California Office of the President’s Advancing Faculty Diversity program. THE PROBLEM","PeriodicalId":48096,"journal":{"name":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","volume":"7 1","pages":"137 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concrete Diversity Initiatives in Political Science: A Faculty Workload Intervention Program\",\"authors\":\"Heather Stoll, Michele McLaughlin-Zamora, Sarah E. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1049096522000877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, racial justice protests, and the #MeToo Movement, highlighted the various ways that systemic racism and sexism persist in academia. Underrepresentation, obstacles to career advancement, and difficult department climates persist for women and underrepresented minority (URM) faculty, despite what we know now about this “leaky pipeline” (American Political Science Association 2004). Political science is no exception. In 2020, the American Political Science Association (APSA) renewed its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) (American Political Science Association 2020). However, as discussed in Reinhardt and King’s introduction to this symposium, the political science profession remains one of the most maleand white-dominated social science fields (Mershon and Walsh 2016; Michelson and Monforti 2021). Inequities in faculty workloads are one principal source of the leaky faculty pipeline. Vital to the functioning of institutions of higher education, service and mentoring are both major elements of faculty workloads. However, these work activities have been shown to be disproportionately undertaken by women and historically marginalized groups. Although the literature currently does not offer a satisfactory explanation for these observed workload inequities, it is unambiguous about the negative consequences for a host of outcomes, ranging from department climate to retention to advancement through the ranks of the professoriate. Unfortunately, and complicatingAPSA’smission to address systemic inequity, few programs exist that attempt evidencebased interventions. To move the disciplinary conversation forward and to add a tool to the resources of political science departments, this article describes a faculty workload intervention program based on O’Meara et al.’s (2018) Faculty Workloads and Rewards Project (FWRP) that also includes the work activity area of mentoring. Here, we apply this program to a hypothetical political science department. This workload intervention program currently is being implemented at four pilot departments across the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) campus, with funding from theUniversity of California Office of the President’s Advancing Faculty Diversity program. THE PROBLEM\",\"PeriodicalId\":48096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ps-Political Science & Politics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"137 - 142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ps-Political Science & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000877\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ps-Political Science & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近发生的事件,包括2019冠状病毒病大流行、种族正义抗议和#MeToo运动,突显了学术界持续存在的系统性种族主义和性别歧视的各种方式。尽管我们现在知道这种“漏水的管道”(美国政治科学协会,2004年),但女性和少数族裔(URM)教员的代表性不足、职业发展障碍和困难的院系环境仍然存在。政治学也不例外。2020年,美国政治科学协会(APSA)重申了其对多样性、公平和包容(DEI)(美国政治科学协会2020)的承诺。然而,正如莱因哈特和金在本次研讨会的介绍中所讨论的那样,政治学专业仍然是男性和白人主导的社会科学领域之一(Mershon和Walsh 2016;michael son and Monforti 2021)。教员工作量的不平等是教员输送管道漏水的一个主要原因。对高等教育机构的运作至关重要的是,服务和指导都是教师工作量的主要因素。然而,这些工作活动已显示不成比例地由妇女和历史上处于边缘地位的群体承担。虽然目前的文献并没有对这些观察到的工作量不平等提供一个令人满意的解释,但它对一系列结果的负面影响是明确的,从部门气氛到保留,再到通过教授级别的晋升。不幸的是,使apsa解决系统性不平等的任务复杂化的是,很少有项目尝试基于证据的干预。为了推进学科对话并为政治科学系的资源添加工具,本文描述了一个基于O ' meara等人(2018)的教师工作量和奖励项目(FWRP)的教师工作量干预计划,该计划还包括指导的工作活动领域。这里,我们把这个程序应用到一个假想的政治科学系。这项工作量干预计划目前正在加州大学圣巴巴拉分校(UCSB)校区的四个试点部门实施,由加州大学校长推进教师多样性计划办公室提供资金。这个问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concrete Diversity Initiatives in Political Science: A Faculty Workload Intervention Program
Recent events, including the COVID-19 pandemic, racial justice protests, and the #MeToo Movement, highlighted the various ways that systemic racism and sexism persist in academia. Underrepresentation, obstacles to career advancement, and difficult department climates persist for women and underrepresented minority (URM) faculty, despite what we know now about this “leaky pipeline” (American Political Science Association 2004). Political science is no exception. In 2020, the American Political Science Association (APSA) renewed its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) (American Political Science Association 2020). However, as discussed in Reinhardt and King’s introduction to this symposium, the political science profession remains one of the most maleand white-dominated social science fields (Mershon and Walsh 2016; Michelson and Monforti 2021). Inequities in faculty workloads are one principal source of the leaky faculty pipeline. Vital to the functioning of institutions of higher education, service and mentoring are both major elements of faculty workloads. However, these work activities have been shown to be disproportionately undertaken by women and historically marginalized groups. Although the literature currently does not offer a satisfactory explanation for these observed workload inequities, it is unambiguous about the negative consequences for a host of outcomes, ranging from department climate to retention to advancement through the ranks of the professoriate. Unfortunately, and complicatingAPSA’smission to address systemic inequity, few programs exist that attempt evidencebased interventions. To move the disciplinary conversation forward and to add a tool to the resources of political science departments, this article describes a faculty workload intervention program based on O’Meara et al.’s (2018) Faculty Workloads and Rewards Project (FWRP) that also includes the work activity area of mentoring. Here, we apply this program to a hypothetical political science department. This workload intervention program currently is being implemented at four pilot departments across the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) campus, with funding from theUniversity of California Office of the President’s Advancing Faculty Diversity program. THE PROBLEM
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ps-Political Science & Politics
Ps-Political Science & Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
166
期刊介绍: PS: Political Science & Politics provides critical analyses of contemporary political phenomena and is the journal of record for the discipline of political science reporting on research, teaching, and professional development. PS, begun in 1968, is the only quarterly professional news and commentary journal in the field and is the prime source of information on political scientists" achievements and professional concerns. PS: Political Science & Politics is sold ONLY as part of a joint subscription with American Political Science Review and Perspectives on Politics.
期刊最新文献
The Invincible Gender Gap in Political Ambition Logging in to Learn: The Effects of Online Civic Education Pedagogy on a Latinx and AAPI Civic Engagement Youth Conference A Case for Description COVID-19 Direct Relief Payments and Political and Economic Attitudes among Tertiary Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study – CORRIGENDUM Escalating Political Violence and the Intersectional Impacts on Latinas in National Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1