以反欺诈为善:移动支付的道德反欺诈系统

Z. Din, Harish Venugopalan, Henry Lin, Adam Wushensky, Steven Liu, Samuel T. King
{"title":"以反欺诈为善:移动支付的道德反欺诈系统","authors":"Z. Din, Harish Venugopalan, Henry Lin, Adam Wushensky, Steven Liu, Samuel T. King","doi":"10.1109/SP40001.2021.00100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"App builders commonly use security challenges, a form of step-up authentication, to add security to their apps. However, the ethical implications of this type of architecture has not been studied previously.In this paper, we present a large-scale measurement study of running an existing anti-fraud security challenge, Boxer, in real apps running on mobile devices. We find that although Boxer does work well overall, it is unable to scan effectively on devices that run its machine learning models at less than one frame per second (FPS), blocking users who use inexpensive devices.With the insights from our study, we design Daredevil, a new anti-fraud system for scanning payment cards that works well across the broad range of performance characteristics and hardware configurations found on modern mobile devices. Daredevil reduces the number of devices that run at less than one FPS by an order of magnitude compared to Boxer, providing a more equitable system for fighting fraud.In total, we collect data from 5,085,444 real devices spread across 496 real apps running production software and interacting with real users.","PeriodicalId":6786,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"6 1","pages":"1623-1640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doing good by fighting fraud: Ethical anti-fraud systems for mobile payments\",\"authors\":\"Z. Din, Harish Venugopalan, Henry Lin, Adam Wushensky, Steven Liu, Samuel T. King\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SP40001.2021.00100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"App builders commonly use security challenges, a form of step-up authentication, to add security to their apps. However, the ethical implications of this type of architecture has not been studied previously.In this paper, we present a large-scale measurement study of running an existing anti-fraud security challenge, Boxer, in real apps running on mobile devices. We find that although Boxer does work well overall, it is unable to scan effectively on devices that run its machine learning models at less than one frame per second (FPS), blocking users who use inexpensive devices.With the insights from our study, we design Daredevil, a new anti-fraud system for scanning payment cards that works well across the broad range of performance characteristics and hardware configurations found on modern mobile devices. Daredevil reduces the number of devices that run at less than one FPS by an order of magnitude compared to Boxer, providing a more equitable system for fighting fraud.In total, we collect data from 5,085,444 real devices spread across 496 real apps running production software and interacting with real users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1623-1640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40001.2021.00100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40001.2021.00100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

应用程序开发人员通常使用安全挑战(一种升级身份验证形式)来增加应用程序的安全性。然而,这种类型的建筑的伦理含义之前还没有被研究过。在本文中,我们提出了在移动设备上运行的真实应用程序中运行现有反欺诈安全挑战Boxer的大规模测量研究。我们发现,虽然Boxer总体上运行得很好,但它无法在运行其机器学习模型的设备上以低于每秒一帧(FPS)的速度进行有效扫描,从而阻碍了使用廉价设备的用户。根据我们研究的见解,我们设计了Daredevil,这是一种用于扫描支付卡的新型反欺诈系统,在现代移动设备的各种性能特征和硬件配置下都能很好地工作。与《拳击手》相比,《夜魔侠》减少了少于1 FPS的设备数量,提供了一个更公平的系统来对抗欺诈。我们总共收集了5085444个真实设备的数据,这些设备分布在496个运行生产软件并与真实用户交互的真实应用程序中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Doing good by fighting fraud: Ethical anti-fraud systems for mobile payments
App builders commonly use security challenges, a form of step-up authentication, to add security to their apps. However, the ethical implications of this type of architecture has not been studied previously.In this paper, we present a large-scale measurement study of running an existing anti-fraud security challenge, Boxer, in real apps running on mobile devices. We find that although Boxer does work well overall, it is unable to scan effectively on devices that run its machine learning models at less than one frame per second (FPS), blocking users who use inexpensive devices.With the insights from our study, we design Daredevil, a new anti-fraud system for scanning payment cards that works well across the broad range of performance characteristics and hardware configurations found on modern mobile devices. Daredevil reduces the number of devices that run at less than one FPS by an order of magnitude compared to Boxer, providing a more equitable system for fighting fraud.In total, we collect data from 5,085,444 real devices spread across 496 real apps running production software and interacting with real users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A2L: Anonymous Atomic Locks for Scalability in Payment Channel Hubs High-Assurance Cryptography in the Spectre Era An I/O Separation Model for Formal Verification of Kernel Implementations Trust, But Verify: A Longitudinal Analysis Of Android OEM Compliance and Customization HackEd: A Pedagogical Analysis of Online Vulnerability Discovery Exercises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1