哥伦比亚大学英语学生对课堂评价的认知与信念

Folios Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI:10.17227/folios.54-11498
Leonardo Herrera Mosquera, Osmar David González Melendez
{"title":"哥伦比亚大学英语学生对课堂评价的认知与信念","authors":"Leonardo Herrera Mosquera, Osmar David González Melendez","doi":"10.17227/folios.54-11498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The higher education institution, where the present study is conducted, proposes in its school handbook that a formative and democratic learning assessment approach should prevail in all academic activities. In the English as a Foreign Language TeacherEducation Program at this university, eighty percent of students’ grades come from summative testing, and the teachers are the ones who regularly make the decisions regarding any assessment criteria. That is, the formative and democratic componentsare not present in the process. To delve deeper into these aspects, we have inquired students on their perceptions and beliefs concerning classroom assessment and suggestions to improve the process. A small-scale qualitative research study wasconducted with 49 participants. The data collected through questionnaires, focus-group interviews, and narratives allowed us to organize the findings according to three emerging categories: students’ perceptions of assessment as Assessment of Learning (aol), Assessment for Learning (afl), and suggestions for improving the overall language evaluation process. The different concepts provided by the participants go from believing that classroom evaluation constitutes a procedure to elicit rote reproduction to that of perceiving it as an opportunity to enhance students’ formation. Actions for improving assessmentgo from particular procedural aspects to those related to a more general approach.\n ","PeriodicalId":30346,"journal":{"name":"Folios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and Beliefs of EFL Students Regarding Classroom Assessment at a Colombian University\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Herrera Mosquera, Osmar David González Melendez\",\"doi\":\"10.17227/folios.54-11498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The higher education institution, where the present study is conducted, proposes in its school handbook that a formative and democratic learning assessment approach should prevail in all academic activities. In the English as a Foreign Language TeacherEducation Program at this university, eighty percent of students’ grades come from summative testing, and the teachers are the ones who regularly make the decisions regarding any assessment criteria. That is, the formative and democratic componentsare not present in the process. To delve deeper into these aspects, we have inquired students on their perceptions and beliefs concerning classroom assessment and suggestions to improve the process. A small-scale qualitative research study wasconducted with 49 participants. The data collected through questionnaires, focus-group interviews, and narratives allowed us to organize the findings according to three emerging categories: students’ perceptions of assessment as Assessment of Learning (aol), Assessment for Learning (afl), and suggestions for improving the overall language evaluation process. The different concepts provided by the participants go from believing that classroom evaluation constitutes a procedure to elicit rote reproduction to that of perceiving it as an opportunity to enhance students’ formation. Actions for improving assessmentgo from particular procedural aspects to those related to a more general approach.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":30346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folios\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17227/folios.54-11498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17227/folios.54-11498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

进行本研究的高等教育机构在其学校手册中建议,应在所有学术活动中采用形成性和民主的学习评估方法。在这所大学的英语作为外语教师教育项目中,80%的学生成绩来自总结性考试,教师是定期就任何评估标准做出决定的人。也就是说,在这个过程中不存在形成因素和民主因素。为了更深入地研究这些方面,我们询问了学生对课堂评估的看法和看法,并提出了改进课堂评估过程的建议。对49名参与者进行了小规模定性研究。通过问卷调查、焦点小组访谈和叙述收集的数据使我们能够根据三个新兴类别来组织研究结果:学生对评估的看法:学习评估(aol)、学习评估(afl)以及改进整体语言评估过程的建议。参与者提供了不同的概念,从认为课堂评估是一个引发死记硬背的过程,到认为它是一个增强学生形成的机会。改进评价的行动从特定的程序方面转向与更一般的办法有关的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perceptions and Beliefs of EFL Students Regarding Classroom Assessment at a Colombian University
The higher education institution, where the present study is conducted, proposes in its school handbook that a formative and democratic learning assessment approach should prevail in all academic activities. In the English as a Foreign Language TeacherEducation Program at this university, eighty percent of students’ grades come from summative testing, and the teachers are the ones who regularly make the decisions regarding any assessment criteria. That is, the formative and democratic componentsare not present in the process. To delve deeper into these aspects, we have inquired students on their perceptions and beliefs concerning classroom assessment and suggestions to improve the process. A small-scale qualitative research study wasconducted with 49 participants. The data collected through questionnaires, focus-group interviews, and narratives allowed us to organize the findings according to three emerging categories: students’ perceptions of assessment as Assessment of Learning (aol), Assessment for Learning (afl), and suggestions for improving the overall language evaluation process. The different concepts provided by the participants go from believing that classroom evaluation constitutes a procedure to elicit rote reproduction to that of perceiving it as an opportunity to enhance students’ formation. Actions for improving assessmentgo from particular procedural aspects to those related to a more general approach.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Trayectorias letradas y prospectivas de enseñanza de multiliteracidad de docentes de lenguaje en formación Social Justice Language Education and Critical Language Education: Integrating Perspectives for Teacher Education in Colombia Nuevos estudios de literacidad: reflexiones sobre desarrollos conceptuales para ampliar perspectivas decoloniales de investigación con comunidades ¿Para dónde vamos? Consideraciones en torno a la razón teleológica desde El Hoyo La identidad profesional del maestro de inglés: el sentido de las prácticas de enseñanza
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1