边界和边界研究的范式转变:披露地缘政治假设

IF 2.2 Q2 GEOGRAPHY SPACE AND POLITY Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/13562576.2021.1991784
L. Gaeta
{"title":"边界和边界研究的范式转变:披露地缘政治假设","authors":"L. Gaeta","doi":"10.1080/13562576.2021.1991784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article argues that four paradigm shifts have unfolded in boundary and border studies from the delimitation of the Durand line as the Indo-Afghan frontier. Three subsequent paradigm shifts relate to cooperative management of the Canada–US border after WW1, cultural hybridization across the Mexico-US border since the 1980s, and current networked assemblage of EU’s external border. The paradigm-shift framework connects conceptual advancements in boundary making and border studies with the geopolitical prominence of given borders. The article claims that scholars draw ideal types from the paradigmatic borders of their times, either by accepting or contesting the values anchored in them.","PeriodicalId":46632,"journal":{"name":"SPACE AND POLITY","volume":"185 1","pages":"306 - 324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradigm shifts in boundary and border studies: disclosing geopolitical assumptions\",\"authors\":\"L. Gaeta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13562576.2021.1991784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article argues that four paradigm shifts have unfolded in boundary and border studies from the delimitation of the Durand line as the Indo-Afghan frontier. Three subsequent paradigm shifts relate to cooperative management of the Canada–US border after WW1, cultural hybridization across the Mexico-US border since the 1980s, and current networked assemblage of EU’s external border. The paradigm-shift framework connects conceptual advancements in boundary making and border studies with the geopolitical prominence of given borders. The article claims that scholars draw ideal types from the paradigmatic borders of their times, either by accepting or contesting the values anchored in them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"306 - 324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPACE AND POLITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2021.1991784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPACE AND POLITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2021.1991784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,自杜兰德线被划为印度-阿富汗边界以来,边界和边界研究中出现了四种范式转变。随后的三个范式转变涉及到第一次世界大战后加拿大-美国边境的合作管理,自20世纪80年代以来墨西哥-美国边境的文化杂交,以及当前欧盟外部边界的网络化组合。范式转换框架将边界制定和边界研究的概念进步与给定边界的地缘政治重要性联系起来。这篇文章声称,学者们通过接受或反对锚定在其中的价值观,从他们时代的范式边界中绘制出理想的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paradigm shifts in boundary and border studies: disclosing geopolitical assumptions
ABSTRACT This article argues that four paradigm shifts have unfolded in boundary and border studies from the delimitation of the Durand line as the Indo-Afghan frontier. Three subsequent paradigm shifts relate to cooperative management of the Canada–US border after WW1, cultural hybridization across the Mexico-US border since the 1980s, and current networked assemblage of EU’s external border. The paradigm-shift framework connects conceptual advancements in boundary making and border studies with the geopolitical prominence of given borders. The article claims that scholars draw ideal types from the paradigmatic borders of their times, either by accepting or contesting the values anchored in them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SPACE AND POLITY
SPACE AND POLITY GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Space & Polity is a fully refereed scholarly international journal devoted to the theoretical and empirical understanding of the changing relationships between the state, and regional and local forms of governance. The journal provides a forum aimed particularly at bringing together social scientists currently working in a variety of disciplines, including geography, political science, sociology, economics, anthropology and development studies and who have a common interest in the relationships between space, place and politics in less developed as well as the advanced economies.
期刊最新文献
Political and public engagement as topological boundary-making: a critique of ‘Deficit’ approaches in post-communist CEE On purpose: solidarity by accident or design and the generative ambiguity in between Introduction to the special issue on the geographies of populism and populist geographies Sectarian, recreational, or anti-social? Interpreting juvenile violence in post-conflict Belfast Stuck between the EU ‘rock’ and UK ‘hard place’? Northern Ireland as a liminal space after Brexit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1