挪威教育和研究部关于中小学教育和培训数字化的行动计划:评估和批评

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy Pub Date : 2021-04-30 DOI:10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2021-01-04
Andreas Lund
{"title":"挪威教育和研究部关于中小学教育和培训数字化的行动计划:评估和批评","authors":"Andreas Lund","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2021-01-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews and analyzes the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research’s Action Plan for Digitalization in Primary and Secondary Education and Training (AP20). Policy papers are often intended for administrative levels, but will also be perceived as guidance and recommendations for educators. The purpose of this paper is to examine the kind of support and guidelines AP20 gives to educators. This is done by partly investigating the plan’s action steps and priorities. However, AP20 will also be compared with other Ministry documents, in order to look for inner con-sistencyacrossdocuments. Finally,AP20’ssuggestions,action steps,andviewof digitalization,willbebrieflyevaluated in respect to how digitalization naturally occurs and materializes in current and future-oriented educational practices, to determine its ecological validity. The analysis revealed that AP21 is somewhat ambiguous as to its purpose and intended audience. It comes across as rather instrumental: addressing infrastructure, resources, and skills. While this can be explained as being due to its primary aims, scope and audience, it cannot escape the larger educational and pedagogical perspectives, including epistemologies, to be relevant for policies and practices, administration and epistemic work. Thus, there is a need for clarification in future versions.","PeriodicalId":44945,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research’s action plan for digitalization in primary and secondary education and training: appraisal and critique\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Lund\",\"doi\":\"10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2021-01-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reviews and analyzes the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research’s Action Plan for Digitalization in Primary and Secondary Education and Training (AP20). Policy papers are often intended for administrative levels, but will also be perceived as guidance and recommendations for educators. The purpose of this paper is to examine the kind of support and guidelines AP20 gives to educators. This is done by partly investigating the plan’s action steps and priorities. However, AP20 will also be compared with other Ministry documents, in order to look for inner con-sistencyacrossdocuments. Finally,AP20’ssuggestions,action steps,andviewof digitalization,willbebrieflyevaluated in respect to how digitalization naturally occurs and materializes in current and future-oriented educational practices, to determine its ecological validity. The analysis revealed that AP21 is somewhat ambiguous as to its purpose and intended audience. It comes across as rather instrumental: addressing infrastructure, resources, and skills. While this can be explained as being due to its primary aims, scope and audience, it cannot escape the larger educational and pedagogical perspectives, including epistemologies, to be relevant for policies and practices, administration and epistemic work. Thus, there is a need for clarification in future versions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2021-01-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.1891-943X-2021-01-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文回顾和分析了挪威教育和研究部的《中小学教育和培训数字化行动计划》(AP20)。政策文件通常是为行政级别准备的,但也将被视为对教育工作者的指导和建议。本文的目的是研究AP20为教育工作者提供的支持和指导。这是通过部分调查计划的行动步骤和优先事项来完成的。然而,AP20也将与其他部级文件进行比较,以寻找内部一致性。最后,本文将对AP20的建议、行动步骤和数字化观点进行简要评估,以确定数字化在当前和面向未来的教育实践中如何自然发生和实现,以确定其生态有效性。分析显示,AP21在其目的和目标受众方面有些模糊。它给人的印象是相当有用的:处理基础设施、资源和技能。虽然这可以解释为由于其主要目标、范围和受众,但它无法逃避更大的教育和教学观点,包括认识论,与政策和实践、行政和认识论工作有关。因此,有必要在以后的版本中加以澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research’s action plan for digitalization in primary and secondary education and training: appraisal and critique
This paper reviews and analyzes the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research’s Action Plan for Digitalization in Primary and Secondary Education and Training (AP20). Policy papers are often intended for administrative levels, but will also be perceived as guidance and recommendations for educators. The purpose of this paper is to examine the kind of support and guidelines AP20 gives to educators. This is done by partly investigating the plan’s action steps and priorities. However, AP20 will also be compared with other Ministry documents, in order to look for inner con-sistencyacrossdocuments. Finally,AP20’ssuggestions,action steps,andviewof digitalization,willbebrieflyevaluated in respect to how digitalization naturally occurs and materializes in current and future-oriented educational practices, to determine its ecological validity. The analysis revealed that AP21 is somewhat ambiguous as to its purpose and intended audience. It comes across as rather instrumental: addressing infrastructure, resources, and skills. While this can be explained as being due to its primary aims, scope and audience, it cannot escape the larger educational and pedagogical perspectives, including epistemologies, to be relevant for policies and practices, administration and epistemic work. Thus, there is a need for clarification in future versions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy
Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Why Are Norwegian Education Authorities Digitising Education? Digital nødundervisning under covid-19-nedstengning Physiotherapy Students’ Shaping of Digital Learning Practices: Characteristics, Opportunities and Challenges Reading in the digital age Læringsanalyse – tilbakeblikk og frampek
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1