野生和池塘养殖条件下非洲鲶鱼Clarias gariepinus和尼罗罗非鱼Oreochromis nilotius营养成分、脂肪酸特征及感官评价的比较

C. Anarado, Emmanuel Ekolie, C. Iziga, C. E. Anarado, Augustine N. Eboatu
{"title":"野生和池塘养殖条件下非洲鲶鱼Clarias gariepinus和尼罗罗非鱼Oreochromis nilotius营养成分、脂肪酸特征及感官评价的比较","authors":"C. Anarado, Emmanuel Ekolie, C. Iziga, C. E. Anarado, Augustine N. Eboatu","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i91340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus are two important fish species that are widely consumed in many parts of the world. This study investigated the nutritional composition, fatty acid profiles and organoleptic evaluation of these two fish species raised under wild and pond-cultured systems. Five samples each of the species were randomly collected from Ashaka Town, Delta State, Nigeria. The proximate composition was determined using standard AOAC methods. Fatty acid profiles were analyzed using gas chromatography, while organoleptic evaluation was conducted using twenty panelists. C. gariepinus exhibited significantly lower (p<0.05) moisture content (77.76±0.45 and 79.06±0.36) and higher crude fat content (1.75±0.14 and 1.32±0.33) respectively in both wild and pond-cultured species compared to O. niloticus. C. gariepinus had higher protein content than O. niloticus in both wild and pond-cultured species. The carbohydrate content of O. niloticus was significantly higher (p<0.05) than in C. gariepinus, while the ash content of C. gariepinus and O. niloticus was not significantly different (p>0.05). Both species exhibited variations in their fatty acid profiles, with significant differences (p<0.05) observed in the levels of saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). All wild and pond- cultured fish species had the same pattern of fatty acid composition SFAs > PUFAs > MUFAs except wild C. gariepinus with SFAs > MUFAs > PUFAs pattern. Pond-cultured O. niloticus and C. gariepinus had higher total n-3 PUFAs and lower n-6 PUFAs values while wild O. niloticus and C. gariepinus had lower n-3 PUFAs and higher n-6 PUFAs values. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The results indicated significant organoleptic differences (p<0.05) in consumer preference between wild and pond-cultured C. gariepinus, however, O. niloticus was found to be liked similarly regardless of its source (p>0.05). These findings suggest that the type of habitat, fish species and diets have significant impacts on the proximate composition, fatty acid profiles and organoleptic attributes of fishes.","PeriodicalId":11922,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of the Nutritional Composition, Fatty Acid Profiles and Organoleptic Evaluation of Clarias gariepinus (African Catfish) and Oreochromis nilotius (Nile Tilapia) Raised under Wild and Pond-Cultured Systems\",\"authors\":\"C. Anarado, Emmanuel Ekolie, C. Iziga, C. E. Anarado, Augustine N. Eboatu\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i91340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus are two important fish species that are widely consumed in many parts of the world. This study investigated the nutritional composition, fatty acid profiles and organoleptic evaluation of these two fish species raised under wild and pond-cultured systems. Five samples each of the species were randomly collected from Ashaka Town, Delta State, Nigeria. The proximate composition was determined using standard AOAC methods. Fatty acid profiles were analyzed using gas chromatography, while organoleptic evaluation was conducted using twenty panelists. C. gariepinus exhibited significantly lower (p<0.05) moisture content (77.76±0.45 and 79.06±0.36) and higher crude fat content (1.75±0.14 and 1.32±0.33) respectively in both wild and pond-cultured species compared to O. niloticus. C. gariepinus had higher protein content than O. niloticus in both wild and pond-cultured species. The carbohydrate content of O. niloticus was significantly higher (p<0.05) than in C. gariepinus, while the ash content of C. gariepinus and O. niloticus was not significantly different (p>0.05). Both species exhibited variations in their fatty acid profiles, with significant differences (p<0.05) observed in the levels of saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). All wild and pond- cultured fish species had the same pattern of fatty acid composition SFAs > PUFAs > MUFAs except wild C. gariepinus with SFAs > MUFAs > PUFAs pattern. Pond-cultured O. niloticus and C. gariepinus had higher total n-3 PUFAs and lower n-6 PUFAs values while wild O. niloticus and C. gariepinus had lower n-3 PUFAs and higher n-6 PUFAs values. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The results indicated significant organoleptic differences (p<0.05) in consumer preference between wild and pond-cultured C. gariepinus, however, O. niloticus was found to be liked similarly regardless of its source (p>0.05). These findings suggest that the type of habitat, fish species and diets have significant impacts on the proximate composition, fatty acid profiles and organoleptic attributes of fishes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i91340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i91340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加里平Clarias gariepinus和尼罗鱼(Oreochromis niloticus)是世界上许多地区广泛食用的两种重要鱼类。本研究研究了野生和池塘养殖两种鱼类的营养成分、脂肪酸分布和感官评价。从尼日利亚三角洲州的Ashaka镇随机采集了每种物种的5个样本。近似组成采用标准AOAC法测定。脂肪酸谱分析使用气相色谱法,而感官评价进行了20个小组成员。cariepinus则显著降低(p0.05)。两种物种的脂肪酸谱都存在差异,除了野生鸡外,它们的脂肪酸谱存在显著差异(p PUFAs > MUFAs),而野生鸡的脂肪酸谱存在SFAs > MUFAs > PUFAs模式。池塘养殖的niloticus和C. gariepinus的总n-3 PUFAs含量较高,n-6 PUFAs含量较低,而野生的niloticus和C. gariepinus的n-3 PUFAs含量较低,n-6 PUFAs含量较高。差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。这些结果表明,生境类型、鱼类种类和饲料对鱼类的近似组成、脂肪酸谱和感官属性有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of the Nutritional Composition, Fatty Acid Profiles and Organoleptic Evaluation of Clarias gariepinus (African Catfish) and Oreochromis nilotius (Nile Tilapia) Raised under Wild and Pond-Cultured Systems
Clarias gariepinus and Oreochromis niloticus are two important fish species that are widely consumed in many parts of the world. This study investigated the nutritional composition, fatty acid profiles and organoleptic evaluation of these two fish species raised under wild and pond-cultured systems. Five samples each of the species were randomly collected from Ashaka Town, Delta State, Nigeria. The proximate composition was determined using standard AOAC methods. Fatty acid profiles were analyzed using gas chromatography, while organoleptic evaluation was conducted using twenty panelists. C. gariepinus exhibited significantly lower (p<0.05) moisture content (77.76±0.45 and 79.06±0.36) and higher crude fat content (1.75±0.14 and 1.32±0.33) respectively in both wild and pond-cultured species compared to O. niloticus. C. gariepinus had higher protein content than O. niloticus in both wild and pond-cultured species. The carbohydrate content of O. niloticus was significantly higher (p<0.05) than in C. gariepinus, while the ash content of C. gariepinus and O. niloticus was not significantly different (p>0.05). Both species exhibited variations in their fatty acid profiles, with significant differences (p<0.05) observed in the levels of saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). All wild and pond- cultured fish species had the same pattern of fatty acid composition SFAs > PUFAs > MUFAs except wild C. gariepinus with SFAs > MUFAs > PUFAs pattern. Pond-cultured O. niloticus and C. gariepinus had higher total n-3 PUFAs and lower n-6 PUFAs values while wild O. niloticus and C. gariepinus had lower n-3 PUFAs and higher n-6 PUFAs values. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The results indicated significant organoleptic differences (p<0.05) in consumer preference between wild and pond-cultured C. gariepinus, however, O. niloticus was found to be liked similarly regardless of its source (p>0.05). These findings suggest that the type of habitat, fish species and diets have significant impacts on the proximate composition, fatty acid profiles and organoleptic attributes of fishes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Probiotic Attributes of Isolated Yeast Strains from Fruits and Bread Awareness about Nutritional Benefits of Millets among Young Adults of Ayodhya District, India Optimizing Process Conditions for Ghewar Development Using Response Surface Methodology Qualitative Assessment of Flours from Five Varieties of Yam in Benue State Nigeria Awareness about Government Scheme of Maternal Nutrition among Urban Area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1