社区医院为开具非首选抗生素处方的成人提供药剂师驱动的青霉素皮试服务。

Ethan Englert, Andrea Weeks
{"title":"社区医院为开具非首选抗生素处方的成人提供药剂师驱动的青霉素皮试服务。","authors":"Ethan Englert, Andrea Weeks","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxz237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Results of a study evaluating the implementation and impact of a pharmacist-driven penicillin skin testing (PST) service for patients prescribed alternative antibiotics in the community hospital setting are reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pilot service in which patients with a documented penicillin allergy (type I, immunoglobulin E [IgE]-mediated) who were prescribed alternative antibiotics received PST by a trained pharmacist was implemented; if test results were negative, the allergy was de-labeled from their electronic medical record. The primary objective was the percentage of patients switched to first-line antibiotics. Secondary objectives included length of stay (LOS) and inpatient antimicrobial costs to the health system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were proactively identified and received PST by a pharmacist. Of those tested, all were negative, with no type I (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity reactions to the test itself or to the beta-lactam antibiotic administered thereafter; 68.2% (15/22) were successfully transitioned to a beta-lactam after PST. As a result, a decrease in the use of fluoroquinolones and vancomycin and an increase in use of narrow penicillin-based antibiotics and first- and second-generation cephalosporins were observed. The mean ± S.D. LOS per patient was 7.41 ± 6.1 days, and the total cost of inpatient antimicrobial therapy to the health system was $1,698.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A pharmacist-driven PST service was successfully implemented in a community hospital setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":17203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","volume":"38 1","pages":"2060-2069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ajhp/zxz237","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacist-driven penicillin skin testing service for adults prescribed nonpreferred antibiotics in a community hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Englert, Andrea Weeks\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxz237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Results of a study evaluating the implementation and impact of a pharmacist-driven penicillin skin testing (PST) service for patients prescribed alternative antibiotics in the community hospital setting are reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective pilot service in which patients with a documented penicillin allergy (type I, immunoglobulin E [IgE]-mediated) who were prescribed alternative antibiotics received PST by a trained pharmacist was implemented; if test results were negative, the allergy was de-labeled from their electronic medical record. The primary objective was the percentage of patients switched to first-line antibiotics. Secondary objectives included length of stay (LOS) and inpatient antimicrobial costs to the health system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were proactively identified and received PST by a pharmacist. Of those tested, all were negative, with no type I (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity reactions to the test itself or to the beta-lactam antibiotic administered thereafter; 68.2% (15/22) were successfully transitioned to a beta-lactam after PST. As a result, a decrease in the use of fluoroquinolones and vancomycin and an increase in use of narrow penicillin-based antibiotics and first- and second-generation cephalosporins were observed. The mean ± S.D. LOS per patient was 7.41 ± 6.1 days, and the total cost of inpatient antimicrobial therapy to the health system was $1,698.88.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A pharmacist-driven PST service was successfully implemented in a community hospital setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"2060-2069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ajhp/zxz237\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Dietetic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxz237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

目的:对社区医院为开具替代抗生素处方的患者提供药剂师驱动的青霉素皮试(PST)服务的实施情况和影响进行评估的研究结果:报告了一项研究的结果,该研究评估了由药剂师驱动的青霉素皮试(PST)服务的实施情况及其对社区医院环境中开具替代抗生素处方的患者的影响:在一项前瞻性试点服务中,有记录的青霉素过敏(I 型,免疫球蛋白 E [IgE]介导)患者被处方使用替代抗生素后,由受过培训的药剂师对其进行青霉素皮试;如果测试结果为阴性,则从其电子病历中删除过敏标签。首要目标是转用一线抗生素的患者比例。次要目标包括住院时间(LOS)和医疗系统的住院抗菌药成本:药剂师主动识别了 22 名患者并对其进行了 PST 检测。在接受检测的患者中,所有患者的检测结果均为阴性,对检测本身或随后使用的β-内酰胺类抗生素均未出现 I 型(IgE 介导的)超敏反应;68.2% 的患者(15/22)在接受 PST 检测后成功转用了β-内酰胺类抗生素。因此,氟喹诺酮类和万古霉素的使用量有所减少,而狭义青霉素类抗生素以及第一代和第二代头孢菌素的使用量有所增加。每位患者的平均住院日(±S.D.)为 7.41±6.1 天,医疗系统的住院抗菌治疗总费用为 1,698.88 美元:药剂师主导的 PST 服务已在社区医院成功实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacist-driven penicillin skin testing service for adults prescribed nonpreferred antibiotics in a community hospital.

Purpose: Results of a study evaluating the implementation and impact of a pharmacist-driven penicillin skin testing (PST) service for patients prescribed alternative antibiotics in the community hospital setting are reported.

Methods: A prospective pilot service in which patients with a documented penicillin allergy (type I, immunoglobulin E [IgE]-mediated) who were prescribed alternative antibiotics received PST by a trained pharmacist was implemented; if test results were negative, the allergy was de-labeled from their electronic medical record. The primary objective was the percentage of patients switched to first-line antibiotics. Secondary objectives included length of stay (LOS) and inpatient antimicrobial costs to the health system.

Results: Twenty-two patients were proactively identified and received PST by a pharmacist. Of those tested, all were negative, with no type I (IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity reactions to the test itself or to the beta-lactam antibiotic administered thereafter; 68.2% (15/22) were successfully transitioned to a beta-lactam after PST. As a result, a decrease in the use of fluoroquinolones and vancomycin and an increase in use of narrow penicillin-based antibiotics and first- and second-generation cephalosporins were observed. The mean ± S.D. LOS per patient was 7.41 ± 6.1 days, and the total cost of inpatient antimicrobial therapy to the health system was $1,698.88.

Conclusion: A pharmacist-driven PST service was successfully implemented in a community hospital setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analyzing bivariate cross-trait genetic architecture in GWAS summary statistics with the BIGA cloud computing platform. Early adversity and emotional awareness: A partial confirmation and extension of their relationship. Comparison of Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in the Treatment of Mechanically Ventilated Critically ill Patients. A Case Report of Chondromyxoid Fibroma of the Nasal Cavity. Effects of COVID-19 Infection and Vaccines on Patients with Epilepsy: Real-Life Experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1