{"title":"丝丝聚糖(1-4,2-乙酰胺-脱氧- b -d -葡聚糖聚合物)对啮齿动物模型伤口愈合的影响","authors":"W. Ho, S. Ying, P. Choi","doi":"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00146.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effect of an artificial skin Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model. \n \n \n \nMaterials and Method: The prospective study was conducted at a basic science laboratory at a tertiary teaching hospital. Two 4 cm × 4 cm full-thickness wounds were created on the dorsal surface of 10 Spraque–Dawley rats and covered with Hyphecan and Kaltostat, respectively. Wounds were examined and measured on days 4, 10, 21 and 28, and would continue after day 28 until healed up completely. Punch biopsies (3 mm) were taken on days 4, 10 and 28 for histological examination of the response of healing and repair. \n \n \n \nResults: Despite the fact that the wound healing rate was similar for both groups on days 4, 10, 21 and 28, the average healing time for the Hyphecan group (29.1 ± 1.7 days) was significantly shorter statistically (P = 0.03) than the Kaltostat group (30.7 ± 2.8 days). Conversely, the marked healing response elicited by Hyphecan on day 4 persisted on days 10 and 28 in contrast to Kaltostat, which had only a mild degree of healing response on days 10 and 28. The study suggests that wounds treated by Hyphecan heal faster than Kaltostat. \n \n \n \nConclusion: The findings provide basic scientific evidence supporting the clinical use of Hyphecan in different wounds and might also reduce the cost of wound management as Hyphecan is cheaper than Kaltostat and requires a shorter treatment time.","PeriodicalId":7943,"journal":{"name":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","volume":"35 1","pages":"113-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model\",\"authors\":\"W. Ho, S. Ying, P. Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00146.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the effect of an artificial skin Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model. \\n \\n \\n \\nMaterials and Method: The prospective study was conducted at a basic science laboratory at a tertiary teaching hospital. Two 4 cm × 4 cm full-thickness wounds were created on the dorsal surface of 10 Spraque–Dawley rats and covered with Hyphecan and Kaltostat, respectively. Wounds were examined and measured on days 4, 10, 21 and 28, and would continue after day 28 until healed up completely. Punch biopsies (3 mm) were taken on days 4, 10 and 28 for histological examination of the response of healing and repair. \\n \\n \\n \\nResults: Despite the fact that the wound healing rate was similar for both groups on days 4, 10, 21 and 28, the average healing time for the Hyphecan group (29.1 ± 1.7 days) was significantly shorter statistically (P = 0.03) than the Kaltostat group (30.7 ± 2.8 days). Conversely, the marked healing response elicited by Hyphecan on day 4 persisted on days 10 and 28 in contrast to Kaltostat, which had only a mild degree of healing response on days 10 and 28. The study suggests that wounds treated by Hyphecan heal faster than Kaltostat. \\n \\n \\n \\nConclusion: The findings provide basic scientific evidence supporting the clinical use of Hyphecan in different wounds and might also reduce the cost of wound management as Hyphecan is cheaper than Kaltostat and requires a shorter treatment time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"113-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00146.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of The College of Surgeons Hong Kong","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1442-2034.2002.00146.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:评价人造皮肤连丝聚糖(1-4,2-乙酰胺-脱氧- b -d -葡聚糖聚合物)对啮齿动物模型创面愈合的影响。材料与方法:前瞻性研究在某三级教学医院基础科学实验室进行。取10只Spraque-Dawley大鼠背部创面2个4 cm × 4 cm全厚创面,分别涂上Hyphecan和Kaltostat。于第4、10、21、28天检查和测量伤口,并于第28天继续检查和测量伤口,直至伤口完全愈合。于第4天、第10天和第28天取穿孔活检(3mm)进行组织学检查,观察愈合和修复的反应。结果:两组创面愈合速度在第4、10、21、28天相似,但连丝康组平均愈合时间(29.1±1.7 d)显著短于卡洛司他组(30.7±2.8 d),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.03)。相反,与Kaltostat相比,Hyphecan在第4天引起的明显愈合反应持续到第10和28天,而Kaltostat在第10和28天只有轻微的愈合反应。研究表明,用菌丝可治疗的伤口愈合速度比用卡尔托司他快。结论:本研究结果为临床在不同创面中使用连丝康提供了基础的科学依据,并且由于比Kaltostat更便宜、治疗时间更短,可降低创面管理成本。
Evaluation of Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model
Objective: To evaluate the effect of an artificial skin Hyphecan (1-4,2-acetamide-deoxy-B-D-glucan polymer) on wound healing in a rodent model.
Materials and Method: The prospective study was conducted at a basic science laboratory at a tertiary teaching hospital. Two 4 cm × 4 cm full-thickness wounds were created on the dorsal surface of 10 Spraque–Dawley rats and covered with Hyphecan and Kaltostat, respectively. Wounds were examined and measured on days 4, 10, 21 and 28, and would continue after day 28 until healed up completely. Punch biopsies (3 mm) were taken on days 4, 10 and 28 for histological examination of the response of healing and repair.
Results: Despite the fact that the wound healing rate was similar for both groups on days 4, 10, 21 and 28, the average healing time for the Hyphecan group (29.1 ± 1.7 days) was significantly shorter statistically (P = 0.03) than the Kaltostat group (30.7 ± 2.8 days). Conversely, the marked healing response elicited by Hyphecan on day 4 persisted on days 10 and 28 in contrast to Kaltostat, which had only a mild degree of healing response on days 10 and 28. The study suggests that wounds treated by Hyphecan heal faster than Kaltostat.
Conclusion: The findings provide basic scientific evidence supporting the clinical use of Hyphecan in different wounds and might also reduce the cost of wound management as Hyphecan is cheaper than Kaltostat and requires a shorter treatment time.