从不同的变量考察院士的新冠焦虑和数字化

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Open Learning Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.2478/eurodl-2022-0005
Gül Karakuş
{"title":"从不同的变量考察院士的新冠焦虑和数字化","authors":"Gül Karakuş","doi":"10.2478/eurodl-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examines academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation regarding different variables. The sample of this study consists of 103 academicians from various universities. A survey model was used. The data collection tools were the “Coronavirus Anxiety Scale” to measure anxiety caused by COVID-19 and the “Academicians Digitalisation Scale” to determine academicians’ digitalisation. Results indicated that while there was a significant difference in academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation regarding different variables, there was no relationship between their COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation.","PeriodicalId":46089,"journal":{"name":"Open Learning","volume":"340 1","pages":"53 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation in terms of different variables\",\"authors\":\"Gül Karakuş\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/eurodl-2022-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study examines academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation regarding different variables. The sample of this study consists of 103 academicians from various universities. A survey model was used. The data collection tools were the “Coronavirus Anxiety Scale” to measure anxiety caused by COVID-19 and the “Academicians Digitalisation Scale” to determine academicians’ digitalisation. Results indicated that while there was a significant difference in academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation regarding different variables, there was no relationship between their COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Learning\",\"volume\":\"340 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2022-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过不同的变量考察了院士的新冠肺炎焦虑和数字化。本研究的样本由103名来自不同大学的院士组成。采用调查模型。数据收集工具为测量新冠肺炎焦虑的“冠状病毒焦虑量表”和确定院士数字化程度的“院士数字化量表”。结果表明,虽然在不同的变量上,院士的新冠肺炎焦虑和数字化存在显著差异,但他们的新冠肺炎焦虑与数字化之间没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation in terms of different variables
Abstract This study examines academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation regarding different variables. The sample of this study consists of 103 academicians from various universities. A survey model was used. The data collection tools were the “Coronavirus Anxiety Scale” to measure anxiety caused by COVID-19 and the “Academicians Digitalisation Scale” to determine academicians’ digitalisation. Results indicated that while there was a significant difference in academicians’ COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation regarding different variables, there was no relationship between their COVID-19 anxiety and digitalisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Learning
Open Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Best practices for mentoring in online programs: supporting faculty and students in higher education Best practices for mentoring in online programs: supporting faculty and students in higher education , edited by Susan Ko and Olena Zhadko, New York, Routledge, 2022, 170 pp., £26.39(paperback), ISBN9781138352476 (e-book), ISBN9780429434754 The mediating role of online learning readiness in the relationship between course satisfaction and self-efficacy to learn statistics in online classes Open and online learning: opportunities and challenges Interactions in an xMOOC: perspectives of learners who completed the course The metaphors of Ed Tech
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1