{"title":"选择技能","authors":"A. Anand, Jian Hua, A. Puckett","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3078061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We contribute to the debate on whether institutional investors have an information advantage in a novel way – by investigating institutional options holdings. We find that net institutional option holdings predict both future abnormal stock returns and earnings surprises, particularly for stocks with more opaque public information environments. The return predictability in net option holdings stems from the negative information reflected in institutions’ put positions, and is orthogonal to other variables that may contain similar information (short interest and signed option trading imbalances). We find that institutions use put options as complements, rather than the often-posited substitute for short selling.","PeriodicalId":11757,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Option Skills\",\"authors\":\"A. Anand, Jian Hua, A. Puckett\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3078061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We contribute to the debate on whether institutional investors have an information advantage in a novel way – by investigating institutional options holdings. We find that net institutional option holdings predict both future abnormal stock returns and earnings surprises, particularly for stocks with more opaque public information environments. The return predictability in net option holdings stems from the negative information reflected in institutions’ put positions, and is orthogonal to other variables that may contain similar information (short interest and signed option trading imbalances). We find that institutions use put options as complements, rather than the often-posited substitute for short selling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3078061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3078061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们以一种新颖的方式——通过调查机构期权持有情况,为机构投资者是否具有信息优势的辩论做出了贡献。我们发现,机构期权净持有量既能预测未来股票的异常收益,也能预测意外收益,特别是对于公共信息环境不透明的股票。净期权持有量的收益可预测性源于机构看跌头寸中反映的负面信息,并且与可能包含类似信息的其他变量(空头权益和签约期权交易失衡)正交。我们发现机构使用看跌期权作为补充,而不是通常假设的卖空的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Option Skills
We contribute to the debate on whether institutional investors have an information advantage in a novel way – by investigating institutional options holdings. We find that net institutional option holdings predict both future abnormal stock returns and earnings surprises, particularly for stocks with more opaque public information environments. The return predictability in net option holdings stems from the negative information reflected in institutions’ put positions, and is orthogonal to other variables that may contain similar information (short interest and signed option trading imbalances). We find that institutions use put options as complements, rather than the often-posited substitute for short selling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Order-flow-based Leading Indicators of Short-term Liquidity Shortfalls An Equilibrium Model of Career Concerns, Investment Horizons, and Mutual Fund Value Added Information, Market Power and Welfare Stock Liquidity and Algorithmic Market Making During the COVID-19 Crisis Financial Information and Diverging Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1