Postmodern Architecture in Socialist Poland: Transformation, Symbolic Form and National Identity

Geography, 46.1 (2022), 21–43. 6. See the panel ‘Imagining NewMaterial Histories of Architecture’ organised by Kim Förster and Sarah Nichols at the 74th Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians in 2021. 7. See, for example, Neri Oxman’s exhibition ‘Material Ecology’, MoMA, 14May – 18 October 2020; or Rachel Armstrong, Vibrant Architecture: Matter as a CoDesigner of Living Structures (Warsaw: De Gruyter, 2015). ‘Dematerialised and material processes seem to be two sides of the same coin’, according to Jon Goodbun and Karin Jaschke, ‘Architecture and Relational Resources: Towards a New Materialist Practice’, Architectural Design, 82.4 (2012), 28–33 (p. 31). 8. See Susanne Lettow, ‘Turning the Turn: New Materialism, Historical Materialism and Critical Theory’, Thesis Eleven, 140.1 (2017), 106–21; and Bram Büscher, ‘The Nonhuman Turn: Critical Reflections on Alienation, Entanglement and Nature Under Capitalism’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 12.1 (2022), 54–73. 9. Gandy, ‘Urban Political Ecology’, p. 13. 10. Zeynep Çelik Alexander, ‘Neo-Naturalism’, Log, 31 (2014), 23–30 (p. 28). 11. Harpreet Sareen, Jiefu Zheng, and Pattie Maes, ‘Cyborg Botany: Augmented Plants as Sensors, Displays and Actuators’, in Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019), p. VS13/1; and on ‘oysters’ see Ross Exo Adams, ‘Notes from the Resilient City’, Log, 32 (2014), 126–39. 12. See Jesse Goldstein and Elizabeth Johnson, ‘Biomimicry: New Natures, New Enclosures’, Theory, Culture and Society, 32.1 (2015), 61–81; Alyssa Battistoni, ‘Bringing in the Work of Nature: From Natural Capital to Hybrid Labor’, Political Theory, 45.1 (2017), 5–31; and Maan Barua, ‘Nonhuman Life as Infrastructure’, Society and Space blog, 30 November 2020 [accessed 6 September 2022].