研究如何定位中东欧女企业家:30年话语分析

IF 3.3 1区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI:10.1080/08985626.2023.2170472
Sanita Rugina, Helene Ahl
{"title":"研究如何定位中东欧女企业家:30年话语分析","authors":"Sanita Rugina, Helene Ahl","doi":"10.1080/08985626.2023.2170472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper analyses how research on women’s entrepreneurship conducted in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) constructs and positions women entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship was illegal under the socialist regimes that governed this area and only began to develop after independence was obtained in the early 1990s. Consequently, research on entrepreneurship, including women’s entrepreneurship, is somewhat new to the region. Our discourse analysis of existing research in this area reveals that, despite different historical pathways towards entrepreneurship, normative premises that exist in Western studies on women’s entrepreneurship also prevail in scholarship produced in CEE. These normative premises impose dominant constructs and methodologies on entrepreneurship policy and the scholarly community. The discourse analysis identified five positioning constructs of women entrepreneurs, all of which stem from the assumption that women are (essentially) inadequately equipped for entrepreneurship. We discuss the discursive practices that produce these results and suggest ways forward for research on women’s entrepreneurship in CEE.","PeriodicalId":54210,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","volume":"44 1","pages":"241 - 263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How research positions Central and Eastern European women entrepreneurs: A 30-year discourse analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sanita Rugina, Helene Ahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08985626.2023.2170472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper analyses how research on women’s entrepreneurship conducted in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) constructs and positions women entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship was illegal under the socialist regimes that governed this area and only began to develop after independence was obtained in the early 1990s. Consequently, research on entrepreneurship, including women’s entrepreneurship, is somewhat new to the region. Our discourse analysis of existing research in this area reveals that, despite different historical pathways towards entrepreneurship, normative premises that exist in Western studies on women’s entrepreneurship also prevail in scholarship produced in CEE. These normative premises impose dominant constructs and methodologies on entrepreneurship policy and the scholarly community. The discourse analysis identified five positioning constructs of women entrepreneurs, all of which stem from the assumption that women are (essentially) inadequately equipped for entrepreneurship. We discuss the discursive practices that produce these results and suggest ways forward for research on women’s entrepreneurship in CEE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2170472\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2170472","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文分析了中东欧地区女性创业研究是如何建构和定位女性企业家的。在统治该地区的社会主义政权下,创业是非法的,直到20世纪90年代初获得独立后才开始发展。因此,关于企业家精神,包括妇女企业家精神的研究对该区域来说有些新鲜。我们对这一领域现有研究的话语分析表明,尽管通往创业的历史路径不同,但西方关于女性创业的研究中存在的规范性前提也普遍存在于中东欧国家的学术研究中。这些规范性前提对创业政策和学术界施加了主导结构和方法。话语分析确定了妇女企业家的五种定位结构,所有这些结构都源于妇女(基本上)没有足够的创业能力的假设。我们讨论了产生这些结果的话语实践,并为中东欧女性创业研究提出了前进的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How research positions Central and Eastern European women entrepreneurs: A 30-year discourse analysis
ABSTRACT This paper analyses how research on women’s entrepreneurship conducted in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) constructs and positions women entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship was illegal under the socialist regimes that governed this area and only began to develop after independence was obtained in the early 1990s. Consequently, research on entrepreneurship, including women’s entrepreneurship, is somewhat new to the region. Our discourse analysis of existing research in this area reveals that, despite different historical pathways towards entrepreneurship, normative premises that exist in Western studies on women’s entrepreneurship also prevail in scholarship produced in CEE. These normative premises impose dominant constructs and methodologies on entrepreneurship policy and the scholarly community. The discourse analysis identified five positioning constructs of women entrepreneurs, all of which stem from the assumption that women are (essentially) inadequately equipped for entrepreneurship. We discuss the discursive practices that produce these results and suggest ways forward for research on women’s entrepreneurship in CEE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development is unique in that it addresses the central factors in economic development - entrepreneurial vitality and innovation - as local and regional phenomena. It provides a multi-disciplinary forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of entrepreneurship and small firm development and for those studying and developing the local and regional context in which entrepreneurs emerge, innovate and establish the new economic activities which drive economic growth and create new economic wealth and employment. The Journal focuses on the diverse and complex characteristics of local and regional economies which lead to entrepreneurial vitality and endow the large and small firms within them with international competitiveness.
期刊最新文献
Back to work? How employers perceive applicants’ experience of entrepreneurial failure Exploring the impact of regional characteristics on social incubators’ mission, structure and activity: a contingency perspective Resilience and digitally-advanced entrepreneurship An Entrepreneurship-as-practice perspective of next-generation becoming family businesses successors: the role of discursive artefacts How small firms build resilience to ward off crises: a paradox perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1