小型机械车间短期接触金属加工液的评估。

D. O'brien, G. Piacitelli, W. Sieber, R. Hughes, J. Catalano
{"title":"小型机械车间短期接触金属加工液的评估。","authors":"D. O'brien, G. Piacitelli, W. Sieber, R. Hughes, J. Catalano","doi":"10.1080/15298660108984636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a study of 23 small machining shops using metalworking fluids (MWFs), real-time air monitoring using an aerosol photometer was performed to investigate the temporal nature of the exposure and to examine the relationship between the instrumental measurements and traditional sampling methods. Time-weighted averages were calculated from the aerosol photometer data and the results were compared to collocated thoracic and 37-mm closed face cassette samplers. The filter samples were analyzed for total mass and the solvent extractable fraction. Depending on the averaging period used, short-term MWF concentrations exceeded 2.0 mg/m3 in 13 to 39% of the plants studied. High short-term exposures were as likely to be found in plants with average concentrations below 0.4 mg/m3 (thoracic-gravimetric) as those above. Regression analyses indicated that the aerosol photometer most closely matched the data obtained from the thoracic fraction of the total mass. In general, the aerosol photometer overestimated the levels determined using the thoracic cyclone and filter, especially when measuring concentrations of water-based fluids. Use of a calibration factor of 0.7 for straight oils or 0.5 for water-based fluids may assist in the interpretation of aerosol photometer measurements if field calibration data are not readily available. Several approaches to determining the calibration factor from field data were evaluated; more complex calibration techniques improved the accuracy of the measurements.","PeriodicalId":7449,"journal":{"name":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of short-term exposures to metalworking fluids in small machine shops.\",\"authors\":\"D. O'brien, G. Piacitelli, W. Sieber, R. Hughes, J. Catalano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15298660108984636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a study of 23 small machining shops using metalworking fluids (MWFs), real-time air monitoring using an aerosol photometer was performed to investigate the temporal nature of the exposure and to examine the relationship between the instrumental measurements and traditional sampling methods. Time-weighted averages were calculated from the aerosol photometer data and the results were compared to collocated thoracic and 37-mm closed face cassette samplers. The filter samples were analyzed for total mass and the solvent extractable fraction. Depending on the averaging period used, short-term MWF concentrations exceeded 2.0 mg/m3 in 13 to 39% of the plants studied. High short-term exposures were as likely to be found in plants with average concentrations below 0.4 mg/m3 (thoracic-gravimetric) as those above. Regression analyses indicated that the aerosol photometer most closely matched the data obtained from the thoracic fraction of the total mass. In general, the aerosol photometer overestimated the levels determined using the thoracic cyclone and filter, especially when measuring concentrations of water-based fluids. Use of a calibration factor of 0.7 for straight oils or 0.5 for water-based fluids may assist in the interpretation of aerosol photometer measurements if field calibration data are not readily available. Several approaches to determining the calibration factor from field data were evaluated; more complex calibration techniques improved the accuracy of the measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIHAJ : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

在对23个使用金属加工液的小型机加工车间进行的一项研究中,使用气溶胶光度计进行了实时空气监测,以调查接触的时间性质,并检查仪器测量与传统采样方法之间的关系。根据气溶胶光度计数据计算时间加权平均值,并将结果与配置的胸椎和37-mm闭式盒式采样器进行比较。对过滤样品的总质量和溶剂可萃取率进行了分析。根据所使用的平均时间,所研究的植物中有13%至39%的短期MWF浓度超过2.0 mg/m3。在平均浓度低于0.4 mg/m3(胸重)的植物中,短期高暴露的可能性与上述植物一样高。回归分析表明,气溶胶光度计与从总质量的胸廓部分获得的数据最接近。总的来说,气溶胶光度计高估了使用胸廓旋风和过滤器确定的水平,特别是在测量水基流体的浓度时。如果现场校准数据不容易获得,对直油使用0.7或对水基流体使用0.5的校准系数可能有助于解释气溶胶光度计的测量结果。评估了几种从现场数据确定校准因子的方法;更复杂的校准技术提高了测量的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation of short-term exposures to metalworking fluids in small machine shops.
In a study of 23 small machining shops using metalworking fluids (MWFs), real-time air monitoring using an aerosol photometer was performed to investigate the temporal nature of the exposure and to examine the relationship between the instrumental measurements and traditional sampling methods. Time-weighted averages were calculated from the aerosol photometer data and the results were compared to collocated thoracic and 37-mm closed face cassette samplers. The filter samples were analyzed for total mass and the solvent extractable fraction. Depending on the averaging period used, short-term MWF concentrations exceeded 2.0 mg/m3 in 13 to 39% of the plants studied. High short-term exposures were as likely to be found in plants with average concentrations below 0.4 mg/m3 (thoracic-gravimetric) as those above. Regression analyses indicated that the aerosol photometer most closely matched the data obtained from the thoracic fraction of the total mass. In general, the aerosol photometer overestimated the levels determined using the thoracic cyclone and filter, especially when measuring concentrations of water-based fluids. Use of a calibration factor of 0.7 for straight oils or 0.5 for water-based fluids may assist in the interpretation of aerosol photometer measurements if field calibration data are not readily available. Several approaches to determining the calibration factor from field data were evaluated; more complex calibration techniques improved the accuracy of the measurements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Approaches and considerations for setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants: report of recent symposia. Approach to setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants in The Netherlands. The origin of a nicotine detection method. Telephone communications with several commercial respirators. Replotting data for chronic beryllium disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1