《宏观经济成果与2019冠状病毒病进展报告》

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Brookings Papers on Economic Activity Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1353/eca.2020.0034
Jesús Fernández-Villaverde, C. I. Jones
{"title":"《宏观经济成果与2019冠状病毒病进展报告》","authors":"Jesús Fernández-Villaverde, C. I. Jones","doi":"10.1353/eca.2020.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This paper combines data on GDP and unemployment and from Google's COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports with data on deaths from COVID-19 to study the macroeconomic outcomes of the pandemic. We present results from an international perspective using data at the country level as well as results for individual US states and key cities throughout the world. The data from these different levels of geographic aggregation offer a remarkably similar view of the pandemic despite the substantial heterogeneity in outcomes. Countries like South Korea, Japan, Germany, and Norway and cities such as Tokyo and Seoul have comparatively few deaths and low macroeconomic losses. At the other extreme, New York City, Lombardy, the United Kingdom, and Madrid have many deaths and large macroeconomic losses. There are fewer locations that seem to succeed on one dimension but suffer on the other, but these include California and Sweden. The variety of cases potentially offers useful policy lessons regarding how to use non-pharmaceutical interventions to support good economic and health outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51405,"journal":{"name":"Brookings Papers on Economic Activity","volume":"150 1","pages":"111 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macroeconomic Outcomes and COVID-19: A Progress Report\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Fernández-Villaverde, C. I. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/eca.2020.0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:This paper combines data on GDP and unemployment and from Google's COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports with data on deaths from COVID-19 to study the macroeconomic outcomes of the pandemic. We present results from an international perspective using data at the country level as well as results for individual US states and key cities throughout the world. The data from these different levels of geographic aggregation offer a remarkably similar view of the pandemic despite the substantial heterogeneity in outcomes. Countries like South Korea, Japan, Germany, and Norway and cities such as Tokyo and Seoul have comparatively few deaths and low macroeconomic losses. At the other extreme, New York City, Lombardy, the United Kingdom, and Madrid have many deaths and large macroeconomic losses. There are fewer locations that seem to succeed on one dimension but suffer on the other, but these include California and Sweden. The variety of cases potentially offers useful policy lessons regarding how to use non-pharmaceutical interventions to support good economic and health outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brookings Papers on Economic Activity\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brookings Papers on Economic Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2020.0034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brookings Papers on Economic Activity","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2020.0034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

摘要

摘要:本文将GDP和失业率数据以及谷歌COVID-19社区流动性报告中的数据与COVID-19死亡数据相结合,研究大流行的宏观经济后果。我们使用国家层面的数据以及美国各州和世界各地主要城市的数据,从国际视角呈现结果。来自这些不同地理聚集水平的数据提供了关于大流行的非常相似的观点,尽管结果存在很大差异。韩国、日本、德国和挪威等国家以及东京和首尔等城市的死亡人数相对较少,宏观经济损失也较低。在另一个极端,纽约市、伦巴第、联合王国和马德里有许多人死亡,宏观经济损失巨大。很少有地方在一个方面取得了成功,但在另一个方面却遭受了损失,但这些地方包括加州和瑞典。各种各样的案例可能为如何利用非药物干预措施来支持良好的经济和健康结果提供有益的政策教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macroeconomic Outcomes and COVID-19: A Progress Report
ABSTRACT:This paper combines data on GDP and unemployment and from Google's COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports with data on deaths from COVID-19 to study the macroeconomic outcomes of the pandemic. We present results from an international perspective using data at the country level as well as results for individual US states and key cities throughout the world. The data from these different levels of geographic aggregation offer a remarkably similar view of the pandemic despite the substantial heterogeneity in outcomes. Countries like South Korea, Japan, Germany, and Norway and cities such as Tokyo and Seoul have comparatively few deaths and low macroeconomic losses. At the other extreme, New York City, Lombardy, the United Kingdom, and Madrid have many deaths and large macroeconomic losses. There are fewer locations that seem to succeed on one dimension but suffer on the other, but these include California and Sweden. The variety of cases potentially offers useful policy lessons regarding how to use non-pharmaceutical interventions to support good economic and health outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (BPEA) is a semi-annual academic conference and journal that pairs rigorous research with real-time policy analysis to address the most urgent economic challenges of the day. Working drafts of the papers are presented and discussed at conferences typically held twice each year, and the final versions of the papers and comments along with summaries of the general discussions are published in the journal several months later. The views expressed by the authors, discussants and conference participants in BPEA are strictly those of the authors, discussants and conference participants, and not of the Brookings Institution. As an independent think tank, the Brookings Institution does not take institutional positions on any issue.
期刊最新文献
Why Do We Dislike Inflation? Changing Central Bank Pressures and Inflation Sustained Debt Reduction: The Jamaica Exception The Emergence of a Uniform Business Cycle in the United States: Evidence from New Claims-Based Unemployment Data The Evolution of Banking in the 21st Century: Evidence and Regulatory Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1