难治性静脉曲张出血的处理方法(综述)

{"title":"难治性静脉曲张出血的处理方法(综述)","authors":"","doi":"10.47690/WJGHE.2021.3309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Short Review Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is seen in 50-70% of patients with cirrhosis & portal hypertension (PHT) [1]. Over the time the severity of the bleeding and complications related to bleeding have significantly reduced due to improvement in clinical management, better availability of vasopressor drugs, improved endoscopic therapies as well as due to availability of definitive treatment options such as TIPS and liver transplantation. About 10-20% patients do not respond to initial management (failure to control bleeding within 48 hrs) and develop re bleeding within 5 days of starting the therapy (initial control of bleeding), these patients can be defined to have refractory variceal bleeding. The causes for refractory variceal bleeding are a. severe liver disease (high MELD-Na and CTP score) b. coagulopathy (increased PT, INR and low platelets) c. post EVL band ulcers (PEBU’s) or slippage of bands [2-4]. Failure to control bleeding leads to poorer outcome due to a. worsening liver failure b. development of organ dysfunction due to hypovolemia and progressive shock c. systemic sepsis and increased gut translocation of bacteria. The management in this group of patients depends upon the general condition of the patient and the liver disease status. There was a recent study which showed that endoscopic appearance of the varices after banding can determine the outcomes in addition to MELDNa score [4]. I. Generalized treatment for stabilization of the patient: a. This includes blood transfusion (packed red blood cell) to maintain a hemoglobin level of 7-8 gram / dl. The restrictive vs liberal treatment has shown that the restrictive strategy was better in terms of rebleeding and mortality [5]. b. The patients with coagulopathy can be treated either with blood products based on lab parameters (INR, platelet count, aPTT) or blood products based on TEG (thromboelastography). The conventional approach in coagulopathy with variceal bleeding is blood component based correction but the data does not support use of blood products in AVB. A recent RCT was done in cirrhotics with GI bleeding and cogulopathy, the patients had a non variceal bleeding source and were managed with TEG guided corrections in comparison to standard INR guided corrections. The study concluded that TEG based correction showed significant reduction in number of blood products","PeriodicalId":93828,"journal":{"name":"World journal of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refractory Variceal Bleeding: Approach To Management (Mini Review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.47690/WJGHE.2021.3309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Short Review Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is seen in 50-70% of patients with cirrhosis & portal hypertension (PHT) [1]. Over the time the severity of the bleeding and complications related to bleeding have significantly reduced due to improvement in clinical management, better availability of vasopressor drugs, improved endoscopic therapies as well as due to availability of definitive treatment options such as TIPS and liver transplantation. About 10-20% patients do not respond to initial management (failure to control bleeding within 48 hrs) and develop re bleeding within 5 days of starting the therapy (initial control of bleeding), these patients can be defined to have refractory variceal bleeding. The causes for refractory variceal bleeding are a. severe liver disease (high MELD-Na and CTP score) b. coagulopathy (increased PT, INR and low platelets) c. post EVL band ulcers (PEBU’s) or slippage of bands [2-4]. Failure to control bleeding leads to poorer outcome due to a. worsening liver failure b. development of organ dysfunction due to hypovolemia and progressive shock c. systemic sepsis and increased gut translocation of bacteria. The management in this group of patients depends upon the general condition of the patient and the liver disease status. There was a recent study which showed that endoscopic appearance of the varices after banding can determine the outcomes in addition to MELDNa score [4]. I. Generalized treatment for stabilization of the patient: a. This includes blood transfusion (packed red blood cell) to maintain a hemoglobin level of 7-8 gram / dl. The restrictive vs liberal treatment has shown that the restrictive strategy was better in terms of rebleeding and mortality [5]. b. The patients with coagulopathy can be treated either with blood products based on lab parameters (INR, platelet count, aPTT) or blood products based on TEG (thromboelastography). The conventional approach in coagulopathy with variceal bleeding is blood component based correction but the data does not support use of blood products in AVB. A recent RCT was done in cirrhotics with GI bleeding and cogulopathy, the patients had a non variceal bleeding source and were managed with TEG guided corrections in comparison to standard INR guided corrections. The study concluded that TEG based correction showed significant reduction in number of blood products\",\"PeriodicalId\":93828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47690/WJGHE.2021.3309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of gastroenterology, hepatology and endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47690/WJGHE.2021.3309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

急性静脉曲张出血(AVB)见于50-70%的肝硬化和门静脉高压(PHT)患者[1]。随着时间的推移,由于临床管理的改善、血管加压药物的改善、内窥镜治疗的改进以及TIPS和肝移植等明确治疗方案的可用性,出血和出血相关并发症的严重程度已显著降低。约10-20%的患者对初始治疗无反应(48小时内未能控制出血),并在开始治疗后5天内再次出血(初步控制出血),这些患者可定义为难治性静脉曲张出血。难治性静脉曲张出血的原因有:a.严重的肝脏疾病(MELD-Na和CTP评分高)b.凝血功能障碍(PT、INR升高和血小板减少)c. EVL后带溃疡(PEBU’s)或带滑脱[2-4]。由于a.肝功能衰竭恶化b.低血容量和进行性休克导致器官功能障碍c.全身性败血症和肠道细菌易位增加,出血控制失败导致预后较差。这组患者的处理取决于患者的一般情况和肝脏疾病状况。最近有一项研究表明,除了MELDNa评分外,内窥镜下静脉曲张的外观也可以决定预后[4]。1 .稳定患者的综合治疗:a.包括输血(填充红细胞)以维持7-8克/分升的血红蛋白水平。限制性治疗与自由治疗对比表明,在再出血和死亡率方面,限制性治疗效果更好[5]。b.凝血功能障碍患者可以使用基于实验室参数(INR、血小板计数、aPTT)的血液制品或基于TEG(血栓弹性成像)的血液制品进行治疗。凝血病合并静脉曲张出血的传统方法是基于血液成分的校正,但数据不支持在AVB中使用血液制品。最近的一项随机对照试验对伴有消化道出血和神经病变的肝硬化患者进行了研究,这些患者有非静脉曲张出血来源,与标准的INR引导矫正相比,采用了TEG引导矫正。该研究的结论是,基于TEG的校正显示了血液制品数量的显著减少
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refractory Variceal Bleeding: Approach To Management (Mini Review)
Short Review Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is seen in 50-70% of patients with cirrhosis & portal hypertension (PHT) [1]. Over the time the severity of the bleeding and complications related to bleeding have significantly reduced due to improvement in clinical management, better availability of vasopressor drugs, improved endoscopic therapies as well as due to availability of definitive treatment options such as TIPS and liver transplantation. About 10-20% patients do not respond to initial management (failure to control bleeding within 48 hrs) and develop re bleeding within 5 days of starting the therapy (initial control of bleeding), these patients can be defined to have refractory variceal bleeding. The causes for refractory variceal bleeding are a. severe liver disease (high MELD-Na and CTP score) b. coagulopathy (increased PT, INR and low platelets) c. post EVL band ulcers (PEBU’s) or slippage of bands [2-4]. Failure to control bleeding leads to poorer outcome due to a. worsening liver failure b. development of organ dysfunction due to hypovolemia and progressive shock c. systemic sepsis and increased gut translocation of bacteria. The management in this group of patients depends upon the general condition of the patient and the liver disease status. There was a recent study which showed that endoscopic appearance of the varices after banding can determine the outcomes in addition to MELDNa score [4]. I. Generalized treatment for stabilization of the patient: a. This includes blood transfusion (packed red blood cell) to maintain a hemoglobin level of 7-8 gram / dl. The restrictive vs liberal treatment has shown that the restrictive strategy was better in terms of rebleeding and mortality [5]. b. The patients with coagulopathy can be treated either with blood products based on lab parameters (INR, platelet count, aPTT) or blood products based on TEG (thromboelastography). The conventional approach in coagulopathy with variceal bleeding is blood component based correction but the data does not support use of blood products in AVB. A recent RCT was done in cirrhotics with GI bleeding and cogulopathy, the patients had a non variceal bleeding source and were managed with TEG guided corrections in comparison to standard INR guided corrections. The study concluded that TEG based correction showed significant reduction in number of blood products
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robotic Colonoscopy Endotics with Colon Wash: Two Performing Technologies in a Winning Combination Impact of Ramadan on crohn's disease Articular Cartilage: Can Articular Cartilage be Considered a Smart Material? Refractory Variceal Bleeding: Approach To Management (Mini Review) Non-invasive delivery of radiofrequency energy in women with faecal incontinence, the new era. The new-generation DQRF™ device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1