差异评估,差异效益:STEM实践研究的四年问题轮盘赌分析

N. Weaverdyck, D. Anbajagane, A. Evrard
{"title":"差异评估,差异效益:STEM实践研究的四年问题轮盘赌分析","authors":"N. Weaverdyck, D. Anbajagane, A. Evrard","doi":"10.1145/3386527.3406731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using five million responses to thousands of practice examination questions on an optional study service known as Problem Roulette, we explore subject-specific differences in assessment style, grade benefit from usage of the service, and differential features in study behavior and grade outcome by birth sex. Our study includes more than 20,000 students enrolled in eight terms of introductory courses in general chemistry, physics and statistics. Student responses in the space of accuracy and response time reveal domain differences; by these measures, physics problems are typically both more difficult and more complex. Grouping students by term-length practice volume, we find significant positive grade benefits to higher volumes of study in chemistry and statistics. Across all subjects, we find that females gain more grade benefit from high study volume than males. Female students also outwork males during prime study hours yet, on average, earn 0.13 ± 0.03 lower grade points in chemistry than males with the same response accuracy in practice, with null results in statistics and physics.","PeriodicalId":20608,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","volume":"228 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Assessment, Differential Benefit: Four-year Problem Roulette Analysis of STEM Practice Study\",\"authors\":\"N. Weaverdyck, D. Anbajagane, A. Evrard\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3386527.3406731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using five million responses to thousands of practice examination questions on an optional study service known as Problem Roulette, we explore subject-specific differences in assessment style, grade benefit from usage of the service, and differential features in study behavior and grade outcome by birth sex. Our study includes more than 20,000 students enrolled in eight terms of introductory courses in general chemistry, physics and statistics. Student responses in the space of accuracy and response time reveal domain differences; by these measures, physics problems are typically both more difficult and more complex. Grouping students by term-length practice volume, we find significant positive grade benefits to higher volumes of study in chemistry and statistics. Across all subjects, we find that females gain more grade benefit from high study volume than males. Female students also outwork males during prime study hours yet, on average, earn 0.13 ± 0.03 lower grade points in chemistry than males with the same response accuracy in practice, with null results in statistics and physics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"volume\":\"228 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3386527.3406731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3386527.3406731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

通过对可选学习服务“问题轮盘”(Problem Roulette)上数千道练习试题的500万份回答,我们探索了不同学科在评估风格、使用该服务的评分优势、学习行为和出生性别评分结果方面的差异。我们的研究包括2万多名学生,他们参加了8个学期的普通化学、物理和统计学入门课程。学生在准确性和反应时间空间上的反应呈现出域差异;通过这些措施,物理问题通常既更困难也更复杂。根据学期实习量对学生进行分组,我们发现化学和统计学的学习量越高,成绩越好。在所有科目中,我们发现女性比男性从高学习量中获得更多的成绩收益。女生在学习的主要时间也比男生用功,但在实践中,在相同的回答精度下,化学成绩平均比男生低0.13±0.03分,统计学和物理成绩为零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differential Assessment, Differential Benefit: Four-year Problem Roulette Analysis of STEM Practice Study
Using five million responses to thousands of practice examination questions on an optional study service known as Problem Roulette, we explore subject-specific differences in assessment style, grade benefit from usage of the service, and differential features in study behavior and grade outcome by birth sex. Our study includes more than 20,000 students enrolled in eight terms of introductory courses in general chemistry, physics and statistics. Student responses in the space of accuracy and response time reveal domain differences; by these measures, physics problems are typically both more difficult and more complex. Grouping students by term-length practice volume, we find significant positive grade benefits to higher volumes of study in chemistry and statistics. Across all subjects, we find that females gain more grade benefit from high study volume than males. Female students also outwork males during prime study hours yet, on average, earn 0.13 ± 0.03 lower grade points in chemistry than males with the same response accuracy in practice, with null results in statistics and physics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trust, Sustainability and [email protected] L@S'22: Ninth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, New York City, NY, USA, June 1 - 3, 2022 L@S'21: Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Virtual Event, Germany, June 22-25, 2021 Leveraging Book Indexes for Automatic Extraction of Concepts in MOOCs Evaluating Bayesian Knowledge Tracing for Estimating Learner Proficiency and Guiding Learner Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1