澳大利亚中部的Amadeus盆地是埃迪卡拉纪前宏观生物进化试验的熔炉吗?

IF 0.8 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI:10.1080/03721426.2021.1935585
P. Plummer
{"title":"澳大利亚中部的Amadeus盆地是埃迪卡拉纪前宏观生物进化试验的熔炉吗?","authors":"P. Plummer","doi":"10.1080/03721426.2021.1935585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Vertical burrowing is a biological activity deemed to have evolved during the earliest Cambrian, the older soft-bodied fossils of the Ediacaran Period, that thrived between 575 and 541 Ma, seemingly being restricted to occupying the seafloor/ocean interface. Yet at two levels within the pre-Ediacaran sequence of the Amadeus Basin, central Australia, are vertical tubular features that have previously been reported as possibly of biogenic origin: a suite of such tubes occurs within the Areyonga Formation, dated at about 700 Ma, while two other tubular structures occur within the older Heavitree Formation that is perhaps 970–950 million years old. Should these structures prove, on re-examination, to indeed have been biologically formed, then vertical burrowing initially evolved possibly as much as 435 million years earlier than previously believed and these features would make the Amadeus Basin an isolated crucible of, seemingly, two evolutionary trials of vertical burrowing, albeit trials that ultimately failed for reasons that are discussed. Additionally, the same two stratigraphic levels each contain another structure that was also initially described as of biogenic origin, one being a possible body-fossil.","PeriodicalId":49425,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia","volume":"48 1 1","pages":"125 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was the Amadeus Basin of Central Australia a crucible for pre-Ediacaran macro-biotic evolutionary trials?\",\"authors\":\"P. Plummer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03721426.2021.1935585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Vertical burrowing is a biological activity deemed to have evolved during the earliest Cambrian, the older soft-bodied fossils of the Ediacaran Period, that thrived between 575 and 541 Ma, seemingly being restricted to occupying the seafloor/ocean interface. Yet at two levels within the pre-Ediacaran sequence of the Amadeus Basin, central Australia, are vertical tubular features that have previously been reported as possibly of biogenic origin: a suite of such tubes occurs within the Areyonga Formation, dated at about 700 Ma, while two other tubular structures occur within the older Heavitree Formation that is perhaps 970–950 million years old. Should these structures prove, on re-examination, to indeed have been biologically formed, then vertical burrowing initially evolved possibly as much as 435 million years earlier than previously believed and these features would make the Amadeus Basin an isolated crucible of, seemingly, two evolutionary trials of vertical burrowing, albeit trials that ultimately failed for reasons that are discussed. Additionally, the same two stratigraphic levels each contain another structure that was also initially described as of biogenic origin, one being a possible body-fossil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia\",\"volume\":\"48 1 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03721426.2021.1935585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03721426.2021.1935585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

垂直挖洞是一种生物活动,被认为是在最早的寒武纪(埃迪卡拉纪的更古老的软体化石)进化而来,在575 - 541 Ma之间蓬勃发展,似乎仅限于占领海底/海洋界面。然而,在澳大利亚中部Amadeus盆地的前埃迪卡拉纪序列的两个层面上,有垂直管状结构,此前曾被报道为可能是生物成因:一套这样的管状结构出现在约700 Ma的Areyonga组中,而另外两个管状结构出现在更古老的Heavitree组中,可能有9.7 - 9.5亿年的历史。如果这些结构在重新检查后被证明确实是生物形成的,那么垂直穴居的最初进化可能比之前认为的早4.35亿年,这些特征将使Amadeus盆地成为一个孤立的坩埚,似乎是垂直穴居的两个进化试验,尽管试验最终失败了,原因如下所述。此外,同样的两个地层层都包含另一个最初也被描述为生物成因的结构,其中一个可能是身体化石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Was the Amadeus Basin of Central Australia a crucible for pre-Ediacaran macro-biotic evolutionary trials?
ABSTRACT Vertical burrowing is a biological activity deemed to have evolved during the earliest Cambrian, the older soft-bodied fossils of the Ediacaran Period, that thrived between 575 and 541 Ma, seemingly being restricted to occupying the seafloor/ocean interface. Yet at two levels within the pre-Ediacaran sequence of the Amadeus Basin, central Australia, are vertical tubular features that have previously been reported as possibly of biogenic origin: a suite of such tubes occurs within the Areyonga Formation, dated at about 700 Ma, while two other tubular structures occur within the older Heavitree Formation that is perhaps 970–950 million years old. Should these structures prove, on re-examination, to indeed have been biologically formed, then vertical burrowing initially evolved possibly as much as 435 million years earlier than previously believed and these features would make the Amadeus Basin an isolated crucible of, seemingly, two evolutionary trials of vertical burrowing, albeit trials that ultimately failed for reasons that are discussed. Additionally, the same two stratigraphic levels each contain another structure that was also initially described as of biogenic origin, one being a possible body-fossil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
17
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1880, the Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high quality, peer-reviewed papers of particular relevance to Australasia. There is a particular focus on natural history topics such as: botany, zoology, geology, geomorphology, palaeontology, meteorology, geophysics, biophysics, soil science and environmental science, and environmental health. However, the journal is not restricted to these fields, with papers concerning epidemiology, ethnology, anthropology, linguistics, and the history of science and exploration also welcomed. Submissions are welcome from all authors, and membership of the Royal Society of South Australia is not required. The following types of manuscripts are welcome: Reviews, Original Research Papers, History of Science and Exploration, Brief Communications, Obituaries.
期刊最新文献
New Aspidella fossils and a frond impression from the early Ediacaran Brachina sequence, central Flinders Ranges, South Australia Earthquake-induced soft-sediment deformation in the Pleistocene succession, Noarlunga Embayment, South Australia Can inclusion of different levels of participation effort improve volunteer diversity and retainment in a citizen science project? Floral visitors, pollinators and floral rewards of the Australian dioecious arid zone shrub Pimelea microcephala subsp. microcephala A review of the Acanthocephala of Australian bandicoots (Peramelidae), with a comment on New Guinean hosts, based on material held in the South Australian museum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1