种族与情感:本·琼森《黑人的面具》中令人愉悦的混合

IF 0.1 1区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES Ben Jonson Journal Pub Date : 2019-04-24 DOI:10.3366/BJJ.2019.0236
Carol Mejia Laperle
{"title":"种族与情感:本·琼森《黑人的面具》中令人愉悦的混合","authors":"Carol Mejia Laperle","doi":"10.3366/BJJ.2019.0236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The critical field of The Masque of Blackness often annotates Queen Anne and her ladies’ blackface performance with a courtier's eye-witness comment that the “lean cheeked moors” were “loathsome” and “ugly.” Yet Ben Jonson's performance text, when read beside Dudley Carleton's correspondences, resists the undue influence of the aristocrat's anecdotal disparagement. This project refuses to take Carleton's denigration as fact. Instead, it investigates the masque's representation of Niger's daughters to develop the affective experience of pleasurable mixing across racial identities and to show how the opulence, innovation, and beauty afforded by blackface are the means to underwrite arguments of political authority. Rather than a deviation from the performance's magnificent appeal, racial impersonation is constitutive of the masque's demonstration of beauty and invention of pleasure. As such, the allegory of King James I's power hinges on a fiction of idealized incorporation that is ideologically powerful precisely because it is primarily an aestheticized, affective experience. Beyond the ostensible trope of racial transformation, Jonson presents the pleasure of mixing across racial identities as the precondition for Britannia's absorption of migrant bodies. Blackness is a visual reminder of an indelible difference that can be absorbed, incorporated, indeed “salved,” by the monarch's faculties of conversion. The affective experience afforded by blackface is thus an argument for the sovereign's power of unification, underwriting what was a largely unfulfilled and controversial political agenda: the coalition of realms under the aegis of Great Britain.","PeriodicalId":40862,"journal":{"name":"Ben Jonson Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race and Affect: Pleasurable Mixing in Ben Jonson's The Masque of Blackness\",\"authors\":\"Carol Mejia Laperle\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/BJJ.2019.0236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The critical field of The Masque of Blackness often annotates Queen Anne and her ladies’ blackface performance with a courtier's eye-witness comment that the “lean cheeked moors” were “loathsome” and “ugly.” Yet Ben Jonson's performance text, when read beside Dudley Carleton's correspondences, resists the undue influence of the aristocrat's anecdotal disparagement. This project refuses to take Carleton's denigration as fact. Instead, it investigates the masque's representation of Niger's daughters to develop the affective experience of pleasurable mixing across racial identities and to show how the opulence, innovation, and beauty afforded by blackface are the means to underwrite arguments of political authority. Rather than a deviation from the performance's magnificent appeal, racial impersonation is constitutive of the masque's demonstration of beauty and invention of pleasure. As such, the allegory of King James I's power hinges on a fiction of idealized incorporation that is ideologically powerful precisely because it is primarily an aestheticized, affective experience. Beyond the ostensible trope of racial transformation, Jonson presents the pleasure of mixing across racial identities as the precondition for Britannia's absorption of migrant bodies. Blackness is a visual reminder of an indelible difference that can be absorbed, incorporated, indeed “salved,” by the monarch's faculties of conversion. The affective experience afforded by blackface is thus an argument for the sovereign's power of unification, underwriting what was a largely unfulfilled and controversial political agenda: the coalition of realms under the aegis of Great Britain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ben Jonson Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ben Jonson Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/BJJ.2019.0236\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ben Jonson Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/BJJ.2019.0236","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《黑色的面具》的批判领域经常用一个朝臣的目击者评论来注解安妮女王和她的女士们的黑脸表演,“瘦脸颊的摩尔人”是“令人厌恶的”和“丑陋的”。然而,本·琼森的表演文本,当与达德利·卡尔顿的信件一起阅读时,抵制住了贵族轶事贬低的过度影响。这个项目拒绝把卡尔顿的诋毁当作事实。相反,它调查了假面舞对尼日尔女儿的代表,以发展跨种族身份愉快混合的情感体验,并展示黑脸所带来的富裕、创新和美丽如何成为支持政治权威论点的手段。种族模仿并没有偏离表演的华丽魅力,而是构成了假面舞会对美的展示和对快乐的创造。因此,詹姆斯一世国王权力的寓言依赖于一个理想化结合的小说,它在意识形态上是强大的,正是因为它主要是一种审美化的情感体验。除了表面上的种族转型,约翰逊还把跨种族身份融合的乐趣作为不列颠尼亚吸收移民身体的先决条件。黑色是一种视觉上的提醒,提醒人们一种不可磨灭的差异,这种差异可以被君主的皈依能力所吸收、融合,甚至“拯救”。因此,黑脸所带来的情感体验是君主统一权力的一个论据,支持了一个基本上未实现且有争议的政治议程:在大不列颠的庇护下建立王国联盟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Race and Affect: Pleasurable Mixing in Ben Jonson's The Masque of Blackness
The critical field of The Masque of Blackness often annotates Queen Anne and her ladies’ blackface performance with a courtier's eye-witness comment that the “lean cheeked moors” were “loathsome” and “ugly.” Yet Ben Jonson's performance text, when read beside Dudley Carleton's correspondences, resists the undue influence of the aristocrat's anecdotal disparagement. This project refuses to take Carleton's denigration as fact. Instead, it investigates the masque's representation of Niger's daughters to develop the affective experience of pleasurable mixing across racial identities and to show how the opulence, innovation, and beauty afforded by blackface are the means to underwrite arguments of political authority. Rather than a deviation from the performance's magnificent appeal, racial impersonation is constitutive of the masque's demonstration of beauty and invention of pleasure. As such, the allegory of King James I's power hinges on a fiction of idealized incorporation that is ideologically powerful precisely because it is primarily an aestheticized, affective experience. Beyond the ostensible trope of racial transformation, Jonson presents the pleasure of mixing across racial identities as the precondition for Britannia's absorption of migrant bodies. Blackness is a visual reminder of an indelible difference that can be absorbed, incorporated, indeed “salved,” by the monarch's faculties of conversion. The affective experience afforded by blackface is thus an argument for the sovereign's power of unification, underwriting what was a largely unfulfilled and controversial political agenda: the coalition of realms under the aegis of Great Britain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ben Jonson Journal
Ben Jonson Journal LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
80.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Rebecca M. Rush, The Fetters of Rhyme: Liberty and Poetic Form in Early Modern England Transcending Justice, Transcending Human Control: Overarching Providence in Shakespeare's Comedies and Romances Ben Jonson Journal Literary Awards The English Renaissance Playwright’s Classical Encyclopedia: The Lectiones Antiquae of Caelius Rhodiginus as a Resource for Jonson and Chapman Epicene and the Bearded Woman Saint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1