可持续发展目标背景下的普遍主义和国家自主权:来自越南的观点

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES International Development Planning Review Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.3828/idpr.2022.9
Ánh Ngọc Vũ, Graham Long
{"title":"可持续发展目标背景下的普遍主义和国家自主权:来自越南的观点","authors":"Ánh Ngọc Vũ, Graham Long","doi":"10.3828/idpr.2022.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article articulates and analyses the tension between universalism and national ownership in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It focuses on the context of Vietnam as a one-party state, committed to the SDGs, that combines socialist commitments and capitalist aspirations. The SDGs have been critiqued from many angles, and ‘national ownership’ is pivotal to an evaluation of these competing perspectives. The article examines how far, in the tension between global commitments and national ownership, the SDG agenda itself is compromised. Using the set of goals, targets and indicators as well as cross-cutting foundational principles championed by the Agenda 2030, i.e. ‘leave no one behind’, ‘multi-stakeholder participation’ and ‘indivisibility’, the article sheds light on the dynamics of Vietnam’s national ownership of the SDGs and reflects on what this means for the SDGs.","PeriodicalId":46625,"journal":{"name":"International Development Planning Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universalism and national ownership in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): perspectives from Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"Ánh Ngọc Vũ, Graham Long\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/idpr.2022.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis article articulates and analyses the tension between universalism and national ownership in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It focuses on the context of Vietnam as a one-party state, committed to the SDGs, that combines socialist commitments and capitalist aspirations. The SDGs have been critiqued from many angles, and ‘national ownership’ is pivotal to an evaluation of these competing perspectives. The article examines how far, in the tension between global commitments and national ownership, the SDG agenda itself is compromised. Using the set of goals, targets and indicators as well as cross-cutting foundational principles championed by the Agenda 2030, i.e. ‘leave no one behind’, ‘multi-stakeholder participation’ and ‘indivisibility’, the article sheds light on the dynamics of Vietnam’s national ownership of the SDGs and reflects on what this means for the SDGs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Development Planning Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Development Planning Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2022.9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Development Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2022.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文阐述并分析了可持续发展目标(SDGs)中普遍主义与国家所有权之间的紧张关系。它关注越南作为一个一党制国家的背景,致力于可持续发展目标,将社会主义承诺和资本主义愿望结合起来。可持续发展目标从许多角度受到了批评,“国家所有权”对于评估这些相互竞争的观点至关重要。本文考察了在全球承诺和国家所有权之间的紧张关系中,可持续发展目标议程本身在多大程度上受到了损害。本文利用一系列目标、指标和指标,以及2030年议程倡导的跨领域基本原则,即“不让任何人掉队”、“多方参与”和“不可分割性”,揭示了越南国家对可持续发展目标的主人主人感,并反思了这对可持续发展目标的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Universalism and national ownership in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): perspectives from Vietnam
This article articulates and analyses the tension between universalism and national ownership in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It focuses on the context of Vietnam as a one-party state, committed to the SDGs, that combines socialist commitments and capitalist aspirations. The SDGs have been critiqued from many angles, and ‘national ownership’ is pivotal to an evaluation of these competing perspectives. The article examines how far, in the tension between global commitments and national ownership, the SDG agenda itself is compromised. Using the set of goals, targets and indicators as well as cross-cutting foundational principles championed by the Agenda 2030, i.e. ‘leave no one behind’, ‘multi-stakeholder participation’ and ‘indivisibility’, the article sheds light on the dynamics of Vietnam’s national ownership of the SDGs and reflects on what this means for the SDGs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: International Development Planning Review’s editorial policy is to reflect international development planning policy and practice. This includes a focus on the physical, economic and social conditions of urban and rural populations. The journal explores current national and international policy agendas, achievements and strategies in this area, offering material of interest to its established academic and professional readership as well as to a broader critical audience.
期刊最新文献
The politics of Africa’s urban–industrialisation: authoritarian centralisation and policy integration Picture this! Vulnerable women’s perspectives on SDGs prioritisation The geography of women’s informal entrepreneurial activities in urban Zambia: place, mobility and locational decision-making Community perception of climate events as a security issue: the case of Hatiya Island, Bangladesh Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1