{"title":"紧急在线教学的危险,学生首选的学习方式和成长的机会","authors":"E. Gonzalez","doi":"10.31686/ijier.vol11.iss3.4102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of emergency online teaching during the covid-19 pandemic, this study was conducted to determine faculty (n=144) and students’ (n=350) perceptions with their experience in an online teaching and learning environment as well as students’ preferred learning modality. Compared to students, faculty indicated better overall satisfaction with their commitment to teaching and their comfort level with technology prior to emergency online instruction, Wilk’s Λ= .851, F (7,428) = 10.721, p= <.001. Both, faculty and students were least satisfied with the quality of instruction during emergency online learning. The majority of students were more inclined toward in person learning (37%) followed by hybrid (33%) and online (30%) modalities. This study has uncovered additional challenges brought by the pandemic during emergency online teaching as well as opportunities expressed by participants. Future studies must explore learning modalities in greater depth (hi-flex, hybrid, fully online (synchronous/asynchronous), and in-person) to suit the diverse needs of students.","PeriodicalId":13726,"journal":{"name":"International journal for innovation education and research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Perils of Emergency Online Instruction, Students’ Preferred Learning Modality & Opportunities for Growth\",\"authors\":\"E. Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.31686/ijier.vol11.iss3.4102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of emergency online teaching during the covid-19 pandemic, this study was conducted to determine faculty (n=144) and students’ (n=350) perceptions with their experience in an online teaching and learning environment as well as students’ preferred learning modality. Compared to students, faculty indicated better overall satisfaction with their commitment to teaching and their comfort level with technology prior to emergency online instruction, Wilk’s Λ= .851, F (7,428) = 10.721, p= <.001. Both, faculty and students were least satisfied with the quality of instruction during emergency online learning. The majority of students were more inclined toward in person learning (37%) followed by hybrid (33%) and online (30%) modalities. This study has uncovered additional challenges brought by the pandemic during emergency online teaching as well as opportunities expressed by participants. Future studies must explore learning modalities in greater depth (hi-flex, hybrid, fully online (synchronous/asynchronous), and in-person) to suit the diverse needs of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal for innovation education and research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal for innovation education and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol11.iss3.4102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for innovation education and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol11.iss3.4102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于在covid-19大流行期间进行了紧急在线教学,本研究旨在确定教师(n=144)和学生(n=350)对其在线教学和学习环境的体验的看法,以及学生首选的学习方式。与学生相比,在紧急在线教学之前,教师对他们的教学承诺和技术舒适度的总体满意度更高,Wilk的Λ= .851, F (7,428) = 10.721, p= <.001。在紧急在线学习期间,教师和学生对教学质量的满意度都最低。大多数学生更倾向于面对面学习(37%),其次是混合学习(33%)和在线学习(30%)。这项研究揭示了大流行给紧急在线教学带来的额外挑战,以及参与者表达的机会。未来的研究必须更深入地探索学习模式(高弹性、混合、全在线(同步/异步)和面对面),以适应学生的不同需求。
The Perils of Emergency Online Instruction, Students’ Preferred Learning Modality & Opportunities for Growth
As a result of emergency online teaching during the covid-19 pandemic, this study was conducted to determine faculty (n=144) and students’ (n=350) perceptions with their experience in an online teaching and learning environment as well as students’ preferred learning modality. Compared to students, faculty indicated better overall satisfaction with their commitment to teaching and their comfort level with technology prior to emergency online instruction, Wilk’s Λ= .851, F (7,428) = 10.721, p= <.001. Both, faculty and students were least satisfied with the quality of instruction during emergency online learning. The majority of students were more inclined toward in person learning (37%) followed by hybrid (33%) and online (30%) modalities. This study has uncovered additional challenges brought by the pandemic during emergency online teaching as well as opportunities expressed by participants. Future studies must explore learning modalities in greater depth (hi-flex, hybrid, fully online (synchronous/asynchronous), and in-person) to suit the diverse needs of students.