臂间收缩压差对原发性青光眼视野进展的影响

Qiong Liu, Minna Rong, Wenhui Deng, Qin Wang, Xing Cao, Dan Zhou, Changhua Ye
{"title":"臂间收缩压差对原发性青光眼视野进展的影响","authors":"Qiong Liu, Minna Rong, Wenhui Deng, Qin Wang, Xing Cao, Dan Zhou, Changhua Ye","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo investigate the effects of inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences (IASBPD) on visual field progression in primary glaucoma patients with controlled intraocular pressure. \n \n \nMethods: \nIn this prospective clinical study, 69 primary glaucoma patients (69 eyes) who had visited Changsha Aier Eye Hospital from August 2013 to November 2018 and who had at least 5 reliable visual reportson file were selected. According to the guided progression analysis (GPA) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, subjects were divided into two groups, the visual field progression group and the non-progression group. All of the patients underwent multiple sets of sequential blood pressure measurements on both arms. A student t test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis were used for data analysis. \n \n \nResults: \nThirty-four patients (34 eyes) were included in the analysis, among which 15 patients (15 eyes) were in the progression group and the other 19 patients (19 eyes) were in non-progression group. The IASBPD of the two groups was 10.6±9.0 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and 5.3±2.8 mmHg, respectively, and IASBPD in the progression group was 5.26 mmHg (95% credibility interval: 0.14-10.37 mmHg) higher than that in the non-progression group (t=-2.177, P=0.045). There were no significant differences in pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, or diastolic ocular perfusion pressure between the two groups (t=0.946, -1.118, -1.967, all P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that an IASBPD of ≥10 mmHg was a risk factor for visual field progression (OR=20.310, P=0.022). Participants were also stratified into two groups with an IASBPD of <10 mmHg (n=26) and ≥10 mmHg (n=8). The rates of visual field progression for the two groups were 30.8% and 87.5%, and rates of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness progression were 42.3% and 87.5%, respectively (P=0.011, 0.030). \n \n \nConclusions: \nIncreased IASBPD may be one of the risk factors for visual field progression in primary glaucoma patients with controlled intraocular pressure. \n \n \nKey words: \nprimary glaucoma; intraocular pressure; visual field; inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"53 1 1","pages":"32-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Inter-Arm Systolic Blood Pressure Differences on Visual Field Progression in Primary Glaucoma\",\"authors\":\"Qiong Liu, Minna Rong, Wenhui Deng, Qin Wang, Xing Cao, Dan Zhou, Changhua Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo investigate the effects of inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences (IASBPD) on visual field progression in primary glaucoma patients with controlled intraocular pressure. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nIn this prospective clinical study, 69 primary glaucoma patients (69 eyes) who had visited Changsha Aier Eye Hospital from August 2013 to November 2018 and who had at least 5 reliable visual reportson file were selected. According to the guided progression analysis (GPA) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, subjects were divided into two groups, the visual field progression group and the non-progression group. All of the patients underwent multiple sets of sequential blood pressure measurements on both arms. A student t test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis were used for data analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nThirty-four patients (34 eyes) were included in the analysis, among which 15 patients (15 eyes) were in the progression group and the other 19 patients (19 eyes) were in non-progression group. The IASBPD of the two groups was 10.6±9.0 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and 5.3±2.8 mmHg, respectively, and IASBPD in the progression group was 5.26 mmHg (95% credibility interval: 0.14-10.37 mmHg) higher than that in the non-progression group (t=-2.177, P=0.045). There were no significant differences in pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, or diastolic ocular perfusion pressure between the two groups (t=0.946, -1.118, -1.967, all P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that an IASBPD of ≥10 mmHg was a risk factor for visual field progression (OR=20.310, P=0.022). Participants were also stratified into two groups with an IASBPD of <10 mmHg (n=26) and ≥10 mmHg (n=8). The rates of visual field progression for the two groups were 30.8% and 87.5%, and rates of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness progression were 42.3% and 87.5%, respectively (P=0.011, 0.030). \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nIncreased IASBPD may be one of the risk factors for visual field progression in primary glaucoma patients with controlled intraocular pressure. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nprimary glaucoma; intraocular pressure; visual field; inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"53 1 1\",\"pages\":\"32-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨臂间收缩压差(IASBPD)对控制眼压的原发性青光眼患者视野进展的影响。方法:本前瞻性临床研究选择2013年8月至2018年11月在长沙市爱尔眼科医院就诊的69例原发性青光眼患者(69只眼),且至少有5份可靠的视力报告文件。根据汉弗莱视野分析仪的引导进行性分析(GPA)将受试者分为视野进行性组和非进行性组。所有患者都接受了多组连续的双臂血压测量。数据分析采用学生t检验、Fisher精确检验和logistic回归分析。结果:34例患者(34眼)纳入分析,其中进展组15例(15眼),非进展组19例(19眼)。两组患者的IASBPD分别为10.6±9.0 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)和5.3±2.8 mmHg,进展组的IASBPD为5.26 mmHg(95%可信区间:0.14 ~ 10.37 mmHg)高于非进展组(t=-2.177, P=0.045)。两组患者脉压、平均动脉压、眼舒张灌注压比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.946, -1.118, -1.967, P均>0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,IASBPD≥10 mmHg是视野恶化的危险因素(OR=20.310, P=0.022)。参与者也被分为IASBPD <10 mmHg (n=26)和≥10 mmHg (n=8)两组。两组患者视野进展率分别为30.8%和87.5%,视网膜神经纤维层厚度进展率分别为42.3%和87.5% (P=0.011, 0.030)。结论:IASBPD升高可能是眼压控制的原发性青光眼患者视野恶化的危险因素之一。关键词:原发性青光眼;眼压;视野;臂间收缩压差
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Inter-Arm Systolic Blood Pressure Differences on Visual Field Progression in Primary Glaucoma
Objective: To investigate the effects of inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences (IASBPD) on visual field progression in primary glaucoma patients with controlled intraocular pressure. Methods: In this prospective clinical study, 69 primary glaucoma patients (69 eyes) who had visited Changsha Aier Eye Hospital from August 2013 to November 2018 and who had at least 5 reliable visual reportson file were selected. According to the guided progression analysis (GPA) of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, subjects were divided into two groups, the visual field progression group and the non-progression group. All of the patients underwent multiple sets of sequential blood pressure measurements on both arms. A student t test, Fisher's exact test and logistic regression analysis were used for data analysis. Results: Thirty-four patients (34 eyes) were included in the analysis, among which 15 patients (15 eyes) were in the progression group and the other 19 patients (19 eyes) were in non-progression group. The IASBPD of the two groups was 10.6±9.0 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) and 5.3±2.8 mmHg, respectively, and IASBPD in the progression group was 5.26 mmHg (95% credibility interval: 0.14-10.37 mmHg) higher than that in the non-progression group (t=-2.177, P=0.045). There were no significant differences in pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure, or diastolic ocular perfusion pressure between the two groups (t=0.946, -1.118, -1.967, all P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that an IASBPD of ≥10 mmHg was a risk factor for visual field progression (OR=20.310, P=0.022). Participants were also stratified into two groups with an IASBPD of <10 mmHg (n=26) and ≥10 mmHg (n=8). The rates of visual field progression for the two groups were 30.8% and 87.5%, and rates of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness progression were 42.3% and 87.5%, respectively (P=0.011, 0.030). Conclusions: Increased IASBPD may be one of the risk factors for visual field progression in primary glaucoma patients with controlled intraocular pressure. Key words: primary glaucoma; intraocular pressure; visual field; inter-arm systolic blood pressure differences
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1