影响马来西亚地方政府采用环境管理会计的制度压力

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change Pub Date : 2021-07-27 DOI:10.1108/jaoc-11-2020-0183
C. Kassim, Noor Liza Adnan, Roziani Ali
{"title":"影响马来西亚地方政府采用环境管理会计的制度压力","authors":"C. Kassim, Noor Liza Adnan, Roziani Ali","doi":"10.1108/jaoc-11-2020-0183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nBecause of the heightened environmental awareness of the public, local governments (LGs) are being pressured to improve on the extent and quality of environmental disclosures (EDs) provided in an array of reporting media. The lack of an accounting tool to identify, measure and report EDs has propelled the infusion of environmental management accounting (EMA) to support the reporting practices. This paper aims to examine the institutional pressures influencing EMA adoption by Malaysian LGs.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing the consensus approach, a self-administered questionnaire survey is conducted on accountants in LGs in Peninsular Malaysia. The items in the questionnaire are based on the findings of prior studies on EMA adoption.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results suggest that coercive isomorphism from the state government is perceived to be the influential institutional factor placing intense pressures on LGs to adopt EMA.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe results solidify the potential role of the state government in any public policy changes which could further stimulate and promote the adoption of EMA.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nInsufficient empirical evidence on the adoption of EMA in LGs within a developing country’s perspective contributes to a limited understanding on the development of environmental-related practices in different economic stages and environment as well as within the public sector’s perspective.\n","PeriodicalId":46141,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional pressures influencing environmental management accounting adoption by Malaysian local governments\",\"authors\":\"C. Kassim, Noor Liza Adnan, Roziani Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jaoc-11-2020-0183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nBecause of the heightened environmental awareness of the public, local governments (LGs) are being pressured to improve on the extent and quality of environmental disclosures (EDs) provided in an array of reporting media. The lack of an accounting tool to identify, measure and report EDs has propelled the infusion of environmental management accounting (EMA) to support the reporting practices. This paper aims to examine the institutional pressures influencing EMA adoption by Malaysian LGs.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nUsing the consensus approach, a self-administered questionnaire survey is conducted on accountants in LGs in Peninsular Malaysia. The items in the questionnaire are based on the findings of prior studies on EMA adoption.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results suggest that coercive isomorphism from the state government is perceived to be the influential institutional factor placing intense pressures on LGs to adopt EMA.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe results solidify the potential role of the state government in any public policy changes which could further stimulate and promote the adoption of EMA.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nInsufficient empirical evidence on the adoption of EMA in LGs within a developing country’s perspective contributes to a limited understanding on the development of environmental-related practices in different economic stages and environment as well as within the public sector’s perspective.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-11-2020-0183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-11-2020-0183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的随着公众环境意识的提高,地方政府(lgg)面临着提高各种报道媒体环境披露(EDs)的程度和质量的压力。由于缺乏一种会计工具来识别、衡量和报告环境影响评估,环境管理会计(EMA)被引入以支持报告实践。本文旨在研究影响马来西亚lgg采用EMA的制度压力。设计/方法/方法采用共识方法,对马来西亚半岛lgg的会计师进行了自我管理的问卷调查。问卷中的项目是基于先前对EMA采用的研究结果。结果表明,来自州政府的强制性同构被认为是施加巨大压力的制度因素,促使地方政府采用EMA。研究局限/启示研究结果巩固了州政府在任何公共政策变化中的潜在作用,这可能进一步刺激和促进环境管理的采用。原创性/价值从发展中国家的角度来看,在LGs中采用环境评估的经验证据不足,导致对不同经济阶段和环境以及公共部门角度下环境相关实践的发展的理解有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutional pressures influencing environmental management accounting adoption by Malaysian local governments
Purpose Because of the heightened environmental awareness of the public, local governments (LGs) are being pressured to improve on the extent and quality of environmental disclosures (EDs) provided in an array of reporting media. The lack of an accounting tool to identify, measure and report EDs has propelled the infusion of environmental management accounting (EMA) to support the reporting practices. This paper aims to examine the institutional pressures influencing EMA adoption by Malaysian LGs. Design/methodology/approach Using the consensus approach, a self-administered questionnaire survey is conducted on accountants in LGs in Peninsular Malaysia. The items in the questionnaire are based on the findings of prior studies on EMA adoption. Findings The results suggest that coercive isomorphism from the state government is perceived to be the influential institutional factor placing intense pressures on LGs to adopt EMA. Research limitations/implications The results solidify the potential role of the state government in any public policy changes which could further stimulate and promote the adoption of EMA. Originality/value Insufficient empirical evidence on the adoption of EMA in LGs within a developing country’s perspective contributes to a limited understanding on the development of environmental-related practices in different economic stages and environment as well as within the public sector’s perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The main objective of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and practitioners from multiple disciplines to disseminate information on organizational and accounting systems change. To achieve this, the journal will be directed at mapping out contemporary changes in the new global business environment. It will seek to explain the new techniques, processes, and philosophies associated with the rise of strategy-oriented accounting and information systems.
期刊最新文献
Show me? Inspire me? Make me? An institutional theory exploration of social and environmental reporting practices Toward an epistemology for anarchist accounting and stakeholder relationship capability: evidence from Iran Does the Directive of the European Union on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information improve reporting? Corporate reporting on the Sustainable Development Goals: a structured literature review and research agenda Value for money (VFM) in private finance initiative (PFI) implementation in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1