腹腔镜骶colpop固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂伴根尖室缺损的近期疗效分析

Pan Xu, S. Ling, E. Hu, Hangjie Xu, Lina Ma, Yinghan Song, Jie Liu, Bixia Yi
{"title":"腹腔镜骶colpop固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂伴根尖室缺损的近期疗效分析","authors":"Pan Xu, S. Ling, E. Hu, Hangjie Xu, Lina Ma, Yinghan Song, Jie Liu, Bixia Yi","doi":"10.3892/wasj.2021.138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The present study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) without mesh in the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with an apical compartment defect (a‑POP). For this purpose, a total of 24 patients with POP [POP quantification (POP‑Q) ≥II] who underwent LSC without mesh between January, 2019 and August, 2020 were analyze retrospec‑ tively. The duration of the surgery, intraoperative blood loss, post‑operative hospital stay, catheter removal time, post‑oper‑ ative pain and post‑operative complications were recorded and evaluated. The changes in the POP‑Q scores at 3 months post‑surgery were then analyzed. The pelvic floor distress inventory short form 20 (PFDI‑20) was used to evaluate the post‑operative systemic improvement and subjective satis‑ faction rate of the patients. All surgeries were successfully completed. The mean duration of the surgery 135.3±31.5 min. The mean loss of blood was 22.9±15.1 ml. No injuries to the great vessels, nerves, rectum, urethra or bladder occurred. The catheter was retained for 2 days and all patients were able to micturate following extubation. The mean observation time following surgery in hospital was 7 days. The average follow‑up time was 9.4±4.0 months. According to POP‑Q scores, the anatomic cure rate of the LSC without mesh was 100%. The PFDI‑20 scores decreased from 90.6±24.6 to 55.8±18.5 (P<0.0001), and the subjective satisfaction rate was 100% (24/24).","PeriodicalId":87378,"journal":{"name":"World Academy of Sciences journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short‑term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with apical compartment defect\",\"authors\":\"Pan Xu, S. Ling, E. Hu, Hangjie Xu, Lina Ma, Yinghan Song, Jie Liu, Bixia Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/wasj.2021.138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The present study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) without mesh in the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with an apical compartment defect (a‑POP). For this purpose, a total of 24 patients with POP [POP quantification (POP‑Q) ≥II] who underwent LSC without mesh between January, 2019 and August, 2020 were analyze retrospec‑ tively. The duration of the surgery, intraoperative blood loss, post‑operative hospital stay, catheter removal time, post‑oper‑ ative pain and post‑operative complications were recorded and evaluated. The changes in the POP‑Q scores at 3 months post‑surgery were then analyzed. The pelvic floor distress inventory short form 20 (PFDI‑20) was used to evaluate the post‑operative systemic improvement and subjective satis‑ faction rate of the patients. All surgeries were successfully completed. The mean duration of the surgery 135.3±31.5 min. The mean loss of blood was 22.9±15.1 ml. No injuries to the great vessels, nerves, rectum, urethra or bladder occurred. The catheter was retained for 2 days and all patients were able to micturate following extubation. The mean observation time following surgery in hospital was 7 days. The average follow‑up time was 9.4±4.0 months. According to POP‑Q scores, the anatomic cure rate of the LSC without mesh was 100%. The PFDI‑20 scores decreased from 90.6±24.6 to 55.8±18.5 (P<0.0001), and the subjective satisfaction rate was 100% (24/24).\",\"PeriodicalId\":87378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Academy of Sciences journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Academy of Sciences journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2021.138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Academy of Sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/wasj.2021.138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 本研究旨在探讨无补片腹腔镜骶colpop固定术(LSC)治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂(POP)伴根尖室缺损(a‑POP)的临床疗效和安全性。为此,回顾性分析了2019年1月至2020年8月期间接受无补片LSC的24例POP [POP量化(POP‑Q)≥II]患者。记录并评估手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、拔管时间、术后疼痛和术后并发症。然后分析术后3个月POP - Q评分的变化。采用盆底窘迫量表短表20 (PFDI - 20)评估患者术后全身改善情况和主观满意度。所有手术均顺利完成。平均手术时间135.3±31.5 min,平均失血量22.9±15.1 ml,无大血管、神经、直肠、尿道、膀胱损伤。导管留置2天,拔管后所有患者均能排尿。术后平均住院观察时间为7 d。平均随访时间9.4±4.0个月。根据POP‑Q评分,无补片LSC的解剖治愈率为100%。PFDI‑20评分由90.6±24.6降至55.8±18.5 (P<0.0001),主观满意率为100%(24/24)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Short‑term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with apical compartment defect
. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) without mesh in the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with an apical compartment defect (a‑POP). For this purpose, a total of 24 patients with POP [POP quantification (POP‑Q) ≥II] who underwent LSC without mesh between January, 2019 and August, 2020 were analyze retrospec‑ tively. The duration of the surgery, intraoperative blood loss, post‑operative hospital stay, catheter removal time, post‑oper‑ ative pain and post‑operative complications were recorded and evaluated. The changes in the POP‑Q scores at 3 months post‑surgery were then analyzed. The pelvic floor distress inventory short form 20 (PFDI‑20) was used to evaluate the post‑operative systemic improvement and subjective satis‑ faction rate of the patients. All surgeries were successfully completed. The mean duration of the surgery 135.3±31.5 min. The mean loss of blood was 22.9±15.1 ml. No injuries to the great vessels, nerves, rectum, urethra or bladder occurred. The catheter was retained for 2 days and all patients were able to micturate following extubation. The mean observation time following surgery in hospital was 7 days. The average follow‑up time was 9.4±4.0 months. According to POP‑Q scores, the anatomic cure rate of the LSC without mesh was 100%. The PFDI‑20 scores decreased from 90.6±24.6 to 55.8±18.5 (P<0.0001), and the subjective satisfaction rate was 100% (24/24).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between neutrophil recruitment and lung inflammation in type I hypersensitivity reaction Plausible use of citicoline as an adjuvant in central nervous system infections: A case report and review of the literature Neonatal hyperglycaemia in extremely preterm and extremely low birth weight infants: A report of a rare case and a review of the literature Correlation between MUAC z‑score and the anthropometric indexes, weight and height, in the assessment of the nutritional status of pediatric inpatients  Implications and considerations of V179D mutation in a patient with HIV treated with cabotegravir/rilpivirine: A case report and mini‑review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1