水泥粉尘暴露对水泥厂工人呼气峰值流速的影响

M. Akhter, N. Noor, M. Begum, Shahin Akhter, Arunima Datta
{"title":"水泥粉尘暴露对水泥厂工人呼气峰值流速的影响","authors":"M. Akhter, N. Noor, M. Begum, Shahin Akhter, Arunima Datta","doi":"10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pollutants exerted from different industries are hazardous for both employees and the environment. Though cement industry is playing a key role in economic growth but is a major source of air pollution. Its exposure affects pulmonary functions due to alteration of structural and functional properties of lung. Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) is a simple, less expensive pulmonary function test which can be done by spirometer to detect obstructive changes in the respiratory tract.This study is aimed to assess the effect of cement dust on peak expiratory flow rate of workers, those who are exposed to cement dust directly in cement factory. \nMaterials and methods: This case control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram in collaboration with Heidelberg Cement Bangladesh Ltd at Chattogram from January 2018 to December 2018. Total 88 male workers with age ranged from 20 to 45 years were included in this study by consecutive sampling method. Case group workers were selected from those who were working at least two years in direct contact of cement dust and control group were from office workers of same factory those who were not in direct contact of cement. 44 subjects were included in each group. A predesigned data collection form was filled up by the researcher,which contained information regarding general physical status, job history, present and past disease, drug history of workers. Individual’s height, weight was measured and BMI was calculated. PEFR was assessed by a portable digital spirometer (Chestgraph HI-101, Japan) in upright sitting posture. After compiling data,statistical analyses were done by using SPSS version Windows 25. Unpaired student's 't' test was done for statistical analysis. \nResults: PEFR of Control and Case group was 7.84±2.21 L/sec and 5.73±1.79 L/sec respectively. In this study Case group showed significant reduction of PEFR (p<0.001) compared to Control group workers. \nConclusion: This study result concluded that occupational exposure to cement dust has deleterious effect on lung which is evident by reduced Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) of cement exposed workers. \nJCMCTA 2021 ; 32 (1) : 72-77","PeriodicalId":93458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","volume":"180 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Exposure to Cement Dust on Peak Expiratory Flow Rate of Cement Factory Workers\",\"authors\":\"M. Akhter, N. Noor, M. Begum, Shahin Akhter, Arunima Datta\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pollutants exerted from different industries are hazardous for both employees and the environment. Though cement industry is playing a key role in economic growth but is a major source of air pollution. Its exposure affects pulmonary functions due to alteration of structural and functional properties of lung. Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) is a simple, less expensive pulmonary function test which can be done by spirometer to detect obstructive changes in the respiratory tract.This study is aimed to assess the effect of cement dust on peak expiratory flow rate of workers, those who are exposed to cement dust directly in cement factory. \\nMaterials and methods: This case control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram in collaboration with Heidelberg Cement Bangladesh Ltd at Chattogram from January 2018 to December 2018. Total 88 male workers with age ranged from 20 to 45 years were included in this study by consecutive sampling method. Case group workers were selected from those who were working at least two years in direct contact of cement dust and control group were from office workers of same factory those who were not in direct contact of cement. 44 subjects were included in each group. A predesigned data collection form was filled up by the researcher,which contained information regarding general physical status, job history, present and past disease, drug history of workers. Individual’s height, weight was measured and BMI was calculated. PEFR was assessed by a portable digital spirometer (Chestgraph HI-101, Japan) in upright sitting posture. After compiling data,statistical analyses were done by using SPSS version Windows 25. Unpaired student's 't' test was done for statistical analysis. \\nResults: PEFR of Control and Case group was 7.84±2.21 L/sec and 5.73±1.79 L/sec respectively. In this study Case group showed significant reduction of PEFR (p<0.001) compared to Control group workers. \\nConclusion: This study result concluded that occupational exposure to cement dust has deleterious effect on lung which is evident by reduced Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) of cement exposed workers. \\nJCMCTA 2021 ; 32 (1) : 72-77\",\"PeriodicalId\":93458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v32i1.66559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来自不同行业的污染物对员工和环境都是有害的。虽然水泥工业在经济增长中发挥着关键作用,但却是空气污染的主要来源。它的暴露会改变肺的结构和功能特性,从而影响肺功能。呼气流量峰值(PEFR)是一种简单、便宜的肺功能测试,可以通过肺活量计来检测呼吸道的阻塞性变化。本研究旨在评估水泥粉尘对水泥厂直接接触水泥粉尘的工人呼气峰值流速的影响。材料和方法:本病例对照研究于2018年1月至2018年12月在Chattogram吉大港医学院生理学系与Chattogram海德堡水泥孟加拉国有限公司合作进行。本研究采用连续抽样的方法,选取年龄在20 ~ 45岁之间的男性职工88人。病例组选取直接接触水泥粉尘工作两年以上的工人,对照组选取不直接接触水泥粉尘的同一工厂办公室工作人员。每组44名受试者。研究人员填写预先设计的数据收集表,其中包含工人的一般身体状况、工作经历、现在和过去的疾病、药物史等信息。测量个体身高、体重,计算BMI。采用便携式数字肺活量计(日本Chestgraph HI-101)在直立坐姿下评估PEFR。数据整理后,采用SPSS Windows 25版本进行统计分析。采用Unpaired student' t检验进行统计分析。结果:对照组PEFR为7.84±2.21 L/sec,病例组PEFR为5.73±1.79 L/sec。在本研究中,与对照组工人相比,病例组PEFR显著降低(p<0.001)。结论:水泥粉尘职业性暴露对肺有一定的危害,水泥粉尘职业性暴露工人的呼气峰值流速(PEFR)明显降低。Jcmcta 2021;32 (1): 72-77
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Exposure to Cement Dust on Peak Expiratory Flow Rate of Cement Factory Workers
Background: Pollutants exerted from different industries are hazardous for both employees and the environment. Though cement industry is playing a key role in economic growth but is a major source of air pollution. Its exposure affects pulmonary functions due to alteration of structural and functional properties of lung. Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) is a simple, less expensive pulmonary function test which can be done by spirometer to detect obstructive changes in the respiratory tract.This study is aimed to assess the effect of cement dust on peak expiratory flow rate of workers, those who are exposed to cement dust directly in cement factory. Materials and methods: This case control study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram in collaboration with Heidelberg Cement Bangladesh Ltd at Chattogram from January 2018 to December 2018. Total 88 male workers with age ranged from 20 to 45 years were included in this study by consecutive sampling method. Case group workers were selected from those who were working at least two years in direct contact of cement dust and control group were from office workers of same factory those who were not in direct contact of cement. 44 subjects were included in each group. A predesigned data collection form was filled up by the researcher,which contained information regarding general physical status, job history, present and past disease, drug history of workers. Individual’s height, weight was measured and BMI was calculated. PEFR was assessed by a portable digital spirometer (Chestgraph HI-101, Japan) in upright sitting posture. After compiling data,statistical analyses were done by using SPSS version Windows 25. Unpaired student's 't' test was done for statistical analysis. Results: PEFR of Control and Case group was 7.84±2.21 L/sec and 5.73±1.79 L/sec respectively. In this study Case group showed significant reduction of PEFR (p<0.001) compared to Control group workers. Conclusion: This study result concluded that occupational exposure to cement dust has deleterious effect on lung which is evident by reduced Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) of cement exposed workers. JCMCTA 2021 ; 32 (1) : 72-77
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation in Management of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur Biliary Ascariasis: Overall Perspective of Management Comparison of Disability Indices by Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and Short Form 36 in Patients of Rheumatoid Arthritis With or Without Fibromyalgia Endoscopic Adenoidectomy with Microdebrider Versus Conventional Adenoidectomy Clinical Profile of RT-PCR Positive Paediatric Patients with COVID 19: Overview from Chattogram, Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1