{"title":"动物饲料中盐酸氯霉素官方检测方法的修改。","authors":"M. L. Hasselberger","doi":"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results are compared for the microbiological analysis of chlortetracycline using the AOAC method and a modified method applicable to potencies above 50 g/ton. Two modifications are presented: substitution of a pH range of 4.0-4.5 instead of the specified pH of 4.5 for the plating solution, and substitution of extraction by shaking instead of the blending procedure. There were no significant differences in results between the AOAC method and the modified method.","PeriodicalId":14752,"journal":{"name":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","volume":"45 1","pages":"790-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modifications to the official method for testing chlortetracycline HCl in animal feeds.\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Hasselberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Results are compared for the microbiological analysis of chlortetracycline using the AOAC method and a modified method applicable to potencies above 50 g/ton. Two modifications are presented: substitution of a pH range of 4.0-4.5 instead of the specified pH of 4.5 for the plating solution, and substitution of extraction by shaking instead of the blending procedure. There were no significant differences in results between the AOAC method and the modified method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"790-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal - Association of Official Analytical Chemists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAOAC/74.5.790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modifications to the official method for testing chlortetracycline HCl in animal feeds.
Results are compared for the microbiological analysis of chlortetracycline using the AOAC method and a modified method applicable to potencies above 50 g/ton. Two modifications are presented: substitution of a pH range of 4.0-4.5 instead of the specified pH of 4.5 for the plating solution, and substitution of extraction by shaking instead of the blending procedure. There were no significant differences in results between the AOAC method and the modified method.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
