损害大于结果

IF 3 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Chinese Journal of International Politics Pub Date : 2016-12-31 DOI:10.18031/jip.2016.12.21.2.221
Soyoung Lee, Taehee Whang
{"title":"损害大于结果","authors":"Soyoung Lee, Taehee Whang","doi":"10.18031/jip.2016.12.21.2.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the relationship between interstate wars and the probability of civil war onset? We argue that defeated interstate wars of higher conflict intensity are more likely to result in civil war onsets than victorious wars of lower intensity. Using the Doyle and Sambanis dataset (2000) for civil wars and the Correlates of War dataset (2010) for interstate wars, our logistic analyses yield evidence that interstate wars resulting in higher battle deaths are related to higher likelihood of civil war while war outcome is not as significant. Such results indicate that interstate war damage is more decisive in determining civil war onset than its outcome. The main significance of this research lies in that by analyzing interstate wars according to their different intensity levels and outcome, it offers a more thorough investigation into the external factors that affect civil war onset. Moreover, it casts doubt on previous rallying effect studies which generally see external conflicts as opportunities to consolidate state power and challenges conventional arguments regarding war outcome and leader tenure by implying that Pyrrhic victories do little to deter civil war outbreaks.","PeriodicalId":46527,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of International Politics","volume":"23 1","pages":"221-247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Damage over Outcome\",\"authors\":\"Soyoung Lee, Taehee Whang\",\"doi\":\"10.18031/jip.2016.12.21.2.221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What is the relationship between interstate wars and the probability of civil war onset? We argue that defeated interstate wars of higher conflict intensity are more likely to result in civil war onsets than victorious wars of lower intensity. Using the Doyle and Sambanis dataset (2000) for civil wars and the Correlates of War dataset (2010) for interstate wars, our logistic analyses yield evidence that interstate wars resulting in higher battle deaths are related to higher likelihood of civil war while war outcome is not as significant. Such results indicate that interstate war damage is more decisive in determining civil war onset than its outcome. The main significance of this research lies in that by analyzing interstate wars according to their different intensity levels and outcome, it offers a more thorough investigation into the external factors that affect civil war onset. Moreover, it casts doubt on previous rallying effect studies which generally see external conflicts as opportunities to consolidate state power and challenges conventional arguments regarding war outcome and leader tenure by implying that Pyrrhic victories do little to deter civil war outbreaks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of International Politics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"221-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of International Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18031/jip.2016.12.21.2.221\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of International Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18031/jip.2016.12.21.2.221","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家间战争与内战爆发的可能性之间的关系是什么?我们认为,失败的高冲突强度的国家间战争比胜利的低强度战争更有可能导致内战的爆发。使用Doyle和Sambanis关于内战的数据集(2000年)和战争相关数据集(2010年)关于国家间战争的数据集,我们的逻辑分析得出的证据表明,导致更高战斗死亡的国家间战争与更高的内战可能性相关,而战争结果则不那么显著。这些结果表明,在决定内战的爆发方面,国家间的战争损害比其结果更具决定性。本研究的主要意义在于,通过对不同强度和结果的国家间战争进行分析,可以更深入地研究影响内战爆发的外部因素。此外,它对以往的集结效应研究提出了质疑,这些研究通常将外部冲突视为巩固国家权力的机会,并通过暗示得不消的胜利对阻止内战爆发几乎没有作用,挑战了关于战争结果和领导人任期的传统论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Damage over Outcome
What is the relationship between interstate wars and the probability of civil war onset? We argue that defeated interstate wars of higher conflict intensity are more likely to result in civil war onsets than victorious wars of lower intensity. Using the Doyle and Sambanis dataset (2000) for civil wars and the Correlates of War dataset (2010) for interstate wars, our logistic analyses yield evidence that interstate wars resulting in higher battle deaths are related to higher likelihood of civil war while war outcome is not as significant. Such results indicate that interstate war damage is more decisive in determining civil war onset than its outcome. The main significance of this research lies in that by analyzing interstate wars according to their different intensity levels and outcome, it offers a more thorough investigation into the external factors that affect civil war onset. Moreover, it casts doubt on previous rallying effect studies which generally see external conflicts as opportunities to consolidate state power and challenges conventional arguments regarding war outcome and leader tenure by implying that Pyrrhic victories do little to deter civil war outbreaks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of International Politics aims to advance the systematic and rigorous study of international relations. Besides the papers based on modern methodology, this journal also publishes research products of historical studies and policy-oriented research. This journal is committed to providing a forum for academic papers and articles on problematic issues. The journal will cover a variety of subjects including: •Chinese foreign policy •Regional dynamics in East Asia •Arms control and disarmament •Military conflict and dispute settlement •Globalization and domestic change •International political economy
期刊最新文献
How does Foreign Aid Enhance Developing Countries’ Export Varieties?: The Role of Human Capital and Institutional Qualities South Korea’s Aid to North Korea from 1995 to 2016: Analysis Based on Humanitarian Diplomacy Living with a Nuclear DPRK: The Transformation of the Korean Question and a Paradigm Shift in North Korea Policy in a Post-Unipolar Moment Analysis of Japanese Products Boycott with Network Theory in International Relations China’s Public Diplomacy Strategy towards Africa According to Climate Change Response under Xi Jinping Era: Focusing on the Renewable Energy Cooperation with Kenya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1