葡萄牙的城市规划和政策:欧盟基金和指导方针的作用概述

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 URBAN STUDIES Urban Research & Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1080/17535069.2021.1980607
Pedro Chamusca
{"title":"葡萄牙的城市规划和政策:欧盟基金和指导方针的作用概述","authors":"Pedro Chamusca","doi":"10.1080/17535069.2021.1980607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This work aims to shed light on the contribution of the Cohesion Policy to the urban dimension of Portuguese cities. This research is based on a case study of Porto. The results show that their contribution was positive, especially concerning the extensive rehabilitation of problematic urban areas, the reinforcement of local administrative entities’ strategic planning and the development of citizen participation mechanisms, accountability and public‒private partnerships. However, the research also identified that the government structure is too centralised and excessive local funding competition made the process more complex, with concepts being applied more to the discourse than practice.","PeriodicalId":46604,"journal":{"name":"Urban Research & Practice","volume":"95 1","pages":"44 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urban planning and policy in Portugal: an overview on the role of EU funds and guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Chamusca\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17535069.2021.1980607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This work aims to shed light on the contribution of the Cohesion Policy to the urban dimension of Portuguese cities. This research is based on a case study of Porto. The results show that their contribution was positive, especially concerning the extensive rehabilitation of problematic urban areas, the reinforcement of local administrative entities’ strategic planning and the development of citizen participation mechanisms, accountability and public‒private partnerships. However, the research also identified that the government structure is too centralised and excessive local funding competition made the process more complex, with concepts being applied more to the discourse than practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1980607\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1980607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在揭示葡萄牙城市凝聚力政策对城市维度的贡献。本研究是基于波尔图的一个案例研究。结果表明,它们的贡献是积极的,特别是在问题城市地区的广泛修复、加强地方行政实体的战略规划和发展公民参与机制、问责制和公私伙伴关系方面。然而,研究也发现,政府结构过于集中,过度的地方资金竞争使得这个过程更加复杂,概念更多地应用于话语而不是实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urban planning and policy in Portugal: an overview on the role of EU funds and guidelines
ABSTRACT This work aims to shed light on the contribution of the Cohesion Policy to the urban dimension of Portuguese cities. This research is based on a case study of Porto. The results show that their contribution was positive, especially concerning the extensive rehabilitation of problematic urban areas, the reinforcement of local administrative entities’ strategic planning and the development of citizen participation mechanisms, accountability and public‒private partnerships. However, the research also identified that the government structure is too centralised and excessive local funding competition made the process more complex, with concepts being applied more to the discourse than practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Research & Practice
Urban Research & Practice URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Developer-driven co-housing in Denmark: strengths and weaknesses compared to resident-driven co-housing Shared challenges, divergent practices. The impact of institutional frameworks on area-based initiatives in Barcelona and Paris Evaluating ‘pocket’ public spaces in Al Wehdat refugee camp, Jordan: challenges and opportunities Urban policy in the framework of the 2030 agenda: balance and perspectives from Latin America and Europe The urban now: living in an age of urban globalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1