青少年在日常生活环境中对在线科学信息的评价:当来源重要时

M. Macedo-Rouet, G. Trópia, W. Castilhos, L. Massarani, V. Brasil, C. Almeida
{"title":"青少年在日常生活环境中对在线科学信息的评价:当来源重要时","authors":"M. Macedo-Rouet, G. Trópia, W. Castilhos, L. Massarani, V. Brasil, C. Almeida","doi":"10.1080/21548455.2023.2175625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Sourcing is the ability to evaluate information by analysing source parameters such as author’s expertise on a given topic. Past research, mostly based on school-related materials and tasks, shows that adolescents do not pay attention to source parameters when evaluating online scientific information. However, recent research has suggested that such a ‘lack of sourcing’ may depend on the purpose for which information seeking takes place. The present study sought (a) to elicit the contexts in which adolescents seek information in their daily lives (included, but not limited to school-related assignments) and (b) to test the assumption that their attention to information sources depends on the purpose of their search. Focus groups were conducted with small groups of teenagers from contrasted socioeconomic backgrounds in two metropolitan areas (Rio de Janeiro and Paris). Five main contexts were identified, ranging from school assignments to monitoring topics of personal interest. Consistent with our assumption, references to sources were more frequent in personal compared with school information seeking contexts. The results suggest that researchers and science educators who wish to develop sourcing strategies among adolescents should use a variety of tasks, building on students’ experiences of sourcing in daily life.","PeriodicalId":45375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","volume":"1 1","pages":"311 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescents’ evaluation of online scientific information in daily life contexts: when sourcing matters\",\"authors\":\"M. Macedo-Rouet, G. Trópia, W. Castilhos, L. Massarani, V. Brasil, C. Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548455.2023.2175625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Sourcing is the ability to evaluate information by analysing source parameters such as author’s expertise on a given topic. Past research, mostly based on school-related materials and tasks, shows that adolescents do not pay attention to source parameters when evaluating online scientific information. However, recent research has suggested that such a ‘lack of sourcing’ may depend on the purpose for which information seeking takes place. The present study sought (a) to elicit the contexts in which adolescents seek information in their daily lives (included, but not limited to school-related assignments) and (b) to test the assumption that their attention to information sources depends on the purpose of their search. Focus groups were conducted with small groups of teenagers from contrasted socioeconomic backgrounds in two metropolitan areas (Rio de Janeiro and Paris). Five main contexts were identified, ranging from school assignments to monitoring topics of personal interest. Consistent with our assumption, references to sources were more frequent in personal compared with school information seeking contexts. The results suggest that researchers and science educators who wish to develop sourcing strategies among adolescents should use a variety of tasks, building on students’ experiences of sourcing in daily life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2023.2175625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2023.2175625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来源是通过分析来源参数(如作者对给定主题的专业知识)来评估信息的能力。过去的研究大多基于学校相关的材料和任务,表明青少年在评估在线科学信息时不注意来源参数。然而,最近的研究表明,这种“缺乏来源”可能取决于信息寻找的目的。本研究试图(a)引出青少年在日常生活中寻找信息的情境(包括但不限于与学校有关的作业),以及(b)检验他们对信息源的关注取决于搜索目的的假设。焦点小组对来自两个大都市(里约热内卢和巴黎)不同社会经济背景的青少年进行了小组调查。确定了五个主要背景,从学校作业到监测个人感兴趣的话题。与我们的假设一致,与学校信息寻找环境相比,个人信息来源的引用更频繁。研究结果表明,研究人员和科学教育工作者如果希望在青少年中发展信息源策略,应该基于学生在日常生活中的信息源经验,使用多种任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adolescents’ evaluation of online scientific information in daily life contexts: when sourcing matters
ABSTRACT Sourcing is the ability to evaluate information by analysing source parameters such as author’s expertise on a given topic. Past research, mostly based on school-related materials and tasks, shows that adolescents do not pay attention to source parameters when evaluating online scientific information. However, recent research has suggested that such a ‘lack of sourcing’ may depend on the purpose for which information seeking takes place. The present study sought (a) to elicit the contexts in which adolescents seek information in their daily lives (included, but not limited to school-related assignments) and (b) to test the assumption that their attention to information sources depends on the purpose of their search. Focus groups were conducted with small groups of teenagers from contrasted socioeconomic backgrounds in two metropolitan areas (Rio de Janeiro and Paris). Five main contexts were identified, ranging from school assignments to monitoring topics of personal interest. Consistent with our assumption, references to sources were more frequent in personal compared with school information seeking contexts. The results suggest that researchers and science educators who wish to develop sourcing strategies among adolescents should use a variety of tasks, building on students’ experiences of sourcing in daily life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement will address the communication between and the engagement by individuals and groups concerning evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences, of science and technology. The journal will aim: -To bridge the gap between theory and practice concerning the communication of evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences of science and technology; -To address the perspectives on communication about science and technology of individuals and groups of citizens of all ages, scientists and engineers, media persons, industrialists, policy makers, from countries throughout the world; -To promote rational discourse about the role of communication concerning science and technology in private, social, economic and cultural aspects of life
期刊最新文献
A pedagogy for success: two stories from STEM Young children’s agency in the science museum: insights from the use of storytelling in object-rich galleries Public education about ShakeAlert® earthquake early warning: evaluation of an animated video in English and Spanish Virtual reality in astronomy education: reflecting on design principles through a dialogue between researchers and practitioners Collaborative capacity-building for collective evaluation: a case study with informal science education centers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1