Ana Idalina de Paiva-Silva, M. K. Pontes, Juliana Silva Rocha Aguiar, W. C. D. Souza
{"title":"我们如何评估面部情绪识别","authors":"Ana Idalina de Paiva-Silva, M. K. Pontes, Juliana Silva Rocha Aguiar, W. C. D. Souza","doi":"10.1037/PNE0000047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adequate interpretation of facial expressions of emotion is crucial for social functioning and human interaction. New methods are being applied, and a review of the methods that are used to evaluate facial emotion recognition is timely for the field. An extensive review was conducted using the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases. The following keywords were used to identify articles that were published within the past 20 years: emotion recognition, face, expression, and assessment. The initial search yielded 291 articles. After applying the exclusion criteria, 115 articles were included in this review. Articles were analyzed using 3 different approaches: (a) non-behavior-dependent methodologies (MRI and electroencephalography [EEG]), (b) behavioral instruments that were used to assess facial emotion recognition, and (c) instruments or methods that were used to assess facial recognition impairment in health conditions. The behavioral instruments were further subdivided into 7 groups. Static human face stimuli were the most frequently used method, although there are some criticisms concerning the ecological validity of these types of stimuli. Nonvalidated instruments were also commonly used, especially in psychopathological studies. Computer-based morphing has been used to develop new visual stimuli, and brief videos are also being applied. Drawings, which may have lower validity, were often used for assessment in children. Research that uses functional and structural MRI or EEG as methodological alternatives has increased in the last decade. This is a rapidly changing field, and more studies are needed to compare methodologies that are used to explore impairments in facial emotion recognition.","PeriodicalId":39094,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Neuroscience","volume":"31 1","pages":"153-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do we evaluate facial emotion recognition\",\"authors\":\"Ana Idalina de Paiva-Silva, M. K. Pontes, Juliana Silva Rocha Aguiar, W. C. D. Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/PNE0000047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adequate interpretation of facial expressions of emotion is crucial for social functioning and human interaction. New methods are being applied, and a review of the methods that are used to evaluate facial emotion recognition is timely for the field. An extensive review was conducted using the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases. The following keywords were used to identify articles that were published within the past 20 years: emotion recognition, face, expression, and assessment. The initial search yielded 291 articles. After applying the exclusion criteria, 115 articles were included in this review. Articles were analyzed using 3 different approaches: (a) non-behavior-dependent methodologies (MRI and electroencephalography [EEG]), (b) behavioral instruments that were used to assess facial emotion recognition, and (c) instruments or methods that were used to assess facial recognition impairment in health conditions. The behavioral instruments were further subdivided into 7 groups. Static human face stimuli were the most frequently used method, although there are some criticisms concerning the ecological validity of these types of stimuli. Nonvalidated instruments were also commonly used, especially in psychopathological studies. Computer-based morphing has been used to develop new visual stimuli, and brief videos are also being applied. Drawings, which may have lower validity, were often used for assessment in children. Research that uses functional and structural MRI or EEG as methodological alternatives has increased in the last decade. This is a rapidly changing field, and more studies are needed to compare methodologies that are used to explore impairments in facial emotion recognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology and Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"153-175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology and Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/PNE0000047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/PNE0000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
摘要
对面部表情的充分解读对于社会功能和人际交往至关重要。新的方法正在被应用,对用于评估面部情感识别的方法进行回顾对该领域是及时的。使用Web of Science, PsycINFO和PubMed数据库进行了广泛的审查。使用以下关键词来识别过去20年内发表的文章:情感识别,面部,表情和评估。最初的搜索产生了291篇文章。应用排除标准后,115篇文章被纳入本综述。文章使用3种不同的方法进行分析:(a)非行为依赖方法(MRI和脑电图[EEG]), (b)用于评估面部情绪识别的行为工具,以及(c)用于评估健康状况下面部识别障碍的工具或方法。行为工具进一步细分为7组。静态人脸刺激是最常用的方法,尽管存在一些关于这些类型刺激的生态有效性的批评。未经验证的仪器也经常被使用,特别是在精神病理学研究中。基于计算机的变形已被用于开发新的视觉刺激,简短的视频也被应用。图画,可能有较低的效度,经常用于评估儿童。在过去十年中,使用功能和结构核磁共振成像或脑电图作为替代方法的研究有所增加。这是一个快速变化的领域,需要更多的研究来比较用于探索面部情感识别障碍的方法。
The adequate interpretation of facial expressions of emotion is crucial for social functioning and human interaction. New methods are being applied, and a review of the methods that are used to evaluate facial emotion recognition is timely for the field. An extensive review was conducted using the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PubMed databases. The following keywords were used to identify articles that were published within the past 20 years: emotion recognition, face, expression, and assessment. The initial search yielded 291 articles. After applying the exclusion criteria, 115 articles were included in this review. Articles were analyzed using 3 different approaches: (a) non-behavior-dependent methodologies (MRI and electroencephalography [EEG]), (b) behavioral instruments that were used to assess facial emotion recognition, and (c) instruments or methods that were used to assess facial recognition impairment in health conditions. The behavioral instruments were further subdivided into 7 groups. Static human face stimuli were the most frequently used method, although there are some criticisms concerning the ecological validity of these types of stimuli. Nonvalidated instruments were also commonly used, especially in psychopathological studies. Computer-based morphing has been used to develop new visual stimuli, and brief videos are also being applied. Drawings, which may have lower validity, were often used for assessment in children. Research that uses functional and structural MRI or EEG as methodological alternatives has increased in the last decade. This is a rapidly changing field, and more studies are needed to compare methodologies that are used to explore impairments in facial emotion recognition.
期刊介绍:
Psychology & Neuroscience publishes articles encompassing all intersection areas between psychology and neurosciences. The journal is organized into five thematic sections: Psychophysics and PerceptionBehavior/Systems/CognitionPlasticity and Neural DevelopmentClinical and Experimental NeuropsychologyNeuropsychopharmacology