《海盗巢穴与大英帝国的崛起,1570-1740》作者:马克·g·汉纳

Nuala Zahedieh
{"title":"《海盗巢穴与大英帝国的崛起,1570-1740》作者:马克·g·汉纳","authors":"Nuala Zahedieh","doi":"10.1353/JCH.2017.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pirates’ Nest: the Impact of Piracy on Newport, Rhode Island and Charles Town, South Carolina, 1670–1740” (Harvard 2006), into a broader context with a long view of the role of plunder in building a “coherent, functioning and integrated [British] empire” (p. 420) between the age of Elizabeth and the outbreak of the War of Jenkins’ Ear. The “pirates” themselves are shadowy figures in the background, as Hanna focuses on their reception and treatment within Anglophone maritime communities on land. His core concern is with how attitudes to sea marauders changed as colonial and metropolitan interests supposedly became increasingly aligned. The first three chapters draw on an extensive secondary literature to tell a familiar story of how plunder was used to launch, defend, and supply the initial settlements on a frontier where state authority and piracy were vaguely defined. They end with the bold assertion that in the 1680s, Jamaica, which had been the preeminent pirate nest, was converted into “one of the most brutal and exploitative slave societies in the world” (p. 143) and, in the process, turned firmly against sea predators: a process which was later replicated elsewhere in other parts of the empire. The next two chapters describe how the shift in Jamaica was accompanied by the rise of piracy in Britain’s mainland colonies until another turning point, or imperial transformation, took place after 1696 which further changed perceptions of “pirates”. The last five chapters consider how “pirates” became increasingly marginalized and unwelcome characters in a more centralized and better regulated empire. Others have pointed to a rapid demise of piracy in the early eighteenth century, and accorded the Royal Navy a key role, but Hanna’s explanation focuses on softer power. He claims that pirate nests were transformed into proMark G. Hanna, Pirate Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570–1740, Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Press, 2015, Maps, 464 pp.","PeriodicalId":83090,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Caribbean history","volume":"68 1","pages":"108 - 111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pirate Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570–1740 by Mark G. Hanna (review)\",\"authors\":\"Nuala Zahedieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/JCH.2017.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pirates’ Nest: the Impact of Piracy on Newport, Rhode Island and Charles Town, South Carolina, 1670–1740” (Harvard 2006), into a broader context with a long view of the role of plunder in building a “coherent, functioning and integrated [British] empire” (p. 420) between the age of Elizabeth and the outbreak of the War of Jenkins’ Ear. The “pirates” themselves are shadowy figures in the background, as Hanna focuses on their reception and treatment within Anglophone maritime communities on land. His core concern is with how attitudes to sea marauders changed as colonial and metropolitan interests supposedly became increasingly aligned. The first three chapters draw on an extensive secondary literature to tell a familiar story of how plunder was used to launch, defend, and supply the initial settlements on a frontier where state authority and piracy were vaguely defined. They end with the bold assertion that in the 1680s, Jamaica, which had been the preeminent pirate nest, was converted into “one of the most brutal and exploitative slave societies in the world” (p. 143) and, in the process, turned firmly against sea predators: a process which was later replicated elsewhere in other parts of the empire. The next two chapters describe how the shift in Jamaica was accompanied by the rise of piracy in Britain’s mainland colonies until another turning point, or imperial transformation, took place after 1696 which further changed perceptions of “pirates”. The last five chapters consider how “pirates” became increasingly marginalized and unwelcome characters in a more centralized and better regulated empire. Others have pointed to a rapid demise of piracy in the early eighteenth century, and accorded the Royal Navy a key role, but Hanna’s explanation focuses on softer power. He claims that pirate nests were transformed into proMark G. Hanna, Pirate Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570–1740, Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Press, 2015, Maps, 464 pp.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Caribbean history\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"108 - 111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Caribbean history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/JCH.2017.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Caribbean history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JCH.2017.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

《海盗的巢穴:1670-1740年海盗对罗德岛新港和南卡罗来纳州查尔斯镇的影响》(哈佛大学,2006年),将其纳入一个更广泛的背景,从长远的角度看待掠夺在伊丽莎白时代和詹金斯耳朵战争爆发之间建立一个“连贯、有效和完整的[大英]帝国”(第420页)中的作用。“海盗”本身是背景中的影子,汉娜关注的是他们在陆地上讲英语的海洋社区中的接待和待遇。他最关心的是,随着殖民地和大都市的利益越来越一致,人们对海上掠夺者的态度发生了怎样的变化。前三章借鉴了大量的二手文献,讲述了一个熟悉的故事,讲述了掠夺是如何被用来发动、保卫和供应边境上最初的定居点的,在那里,国家权力和海盗的定义是模糊的。他们最后大胆地断言,在17世纪80年代,牙买加,这个卓越的海盗巢穴,被转变为“世界上最残酷和剥削的奴隶社会之一”(第143页),在这个过程中,坚定地反对海洋掠食者:这一过程后来在帝国的其他地方被复制。接下来的两章描述了牙买加的转变是如何伴随着海盗在英国大陆殖民地的兴起,直到1696年之后发生的另一个转折点,或者说是帝国转型,这进一步改变了对“海盗”的看法。最后五章讨论了“海盗”是如何在一个更集权、更规范的帝国中变得越来越边缘化和不受欢迎的。其他人指出海盗在18世纪早期迅速消亡,并认为皇家海军发挥了关键作用,但汉纳的解释侧重于软实力。马克·g·汉纳,《海盗巢穴与大英帝国的崛起,1570-1740》,北卡罗来纳州教堂山:北卡罗来纳出版社,2015年,地图,464页。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pirate Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570–1740 by Mark G. Hanna (review)
Pirates’ Nest: the Impact of Piracy on Newport, Rhode Island and Charles Town, South Carolina, 1670–1740” (Harvard 2006), into a broader context with a long view of the role of plunder in building a “coherent, functioning and integrated [British] empire” (p. 420) between the age of Elizabeth and the outbreak of the War of Jenkins’ Ear. The “pirates” themselves are shadowy figures in the background, as Hanna focuses on their reception and treatment within Anglophone maritime communities on land. His core concern is with how attitudes to sea marauders changed as colonial and metropolitan interests supposedly became increasingly aligned. The first three chapters draw on an extensive secondary literature to tell a familiar story of how plunder was used to launch, defend, and supply the initial settlements on a frontier where state authority and piracy were vaguely defined. They end with the bold assertion that in the 1680s, Jamaica, which had been the preeminent pirate nest, was converted into “one of the most brutal and exploitative slave societies in the world” (p. 143) and, in the process, turned firmly against sea predators: a process which was later replicated elsewhere in other parts of the empire. The next two chapters describe how the shift in Jamaica was accompanied by the rise of piracy in Britain’s mainland colonies until another turning point, or imperial transformation, took place after 1696 which further changed perceptions of “pirates”. The last five chapters consider how “pirates” became increasingly marginalized and unwelcome characters in a more centralized and better regulated empire. Others have pointed to a rapid demise of piracy in the early eighteenth century, and accorded the Royal Navy a key role, but Hanna’s explanation focuses on softer power. He claims that pirate nests were transformed into proMark G. Hanna, Pirate Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570–1740, Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Press, 2015, Maps, 464 pp.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
George Padmore's: Black Internationalism by Rodney Worrell (review) "Dishonourable Blacks"? The 1983 "Rebel Tour" and Perspectives on Jamaican Identity and Nationhood “Dishonourable Blacks”? The 1983 “Rebel Tour” and Jamaican Nationhood and Identity Book Review of George Padmore’s: Black Internationalism by Rodney Worrell "To Work Her Grounds": Provision Grounds, Gardens, and Subsistence in Late-Slavery Trinidad, 1824–1833
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1