《现代主义外骨骼:昆虫、战争、文学形式》雷切尔·默里著(书评)

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1215/0041462x-10237821
Brigitte N. McCray
{"title":"《现代主义外骨骼:昆虫、战争、文学形式》雷切尔·默里著(书评)","authors":"Brigitte N. McCray","doi":"10.1215/0041462x-10237821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rachel Murray’s The Modernist Exoskeleton: Insects, War, Literary Form provides a valuable contribution to modernist studies because Murray explains how the field of entomology, which rose in popularity as a result of the First World War, informed modernist aesthetics. The study illustrates the benefits of greening modernism, a recent turn that has moved scholars from studying the city and human psyche in modernist texts to focusing on the intersection of modernism and the natural world. However, Murray’s accessible and fascinating study makes it clear that such a move does not ignore human subjects. Instead, it reveals the complex entanglement of humans with the environment. Murray concentrates on Wyndham Lewis, D. H. Lawrence, H.D., and Samuel Beckett, all of whose experimental work helped to define high Anglomodernism. She claims that “the figure of the exoskeleton (or outer shell) can shed new light on modernism’s linguistic and formal innovations, its engagement with key psychological and socio-political concerns, as well as its questioning of the limits of the human” (3). According to Murray, modernists responded to war, urban modernity, and industrial capitalism by turning to the insect to better understand how humans changed in response to new conditions. Modernists, she claims, began to see humans becoming more and more buglike as they were transformed on the battlefield. In making such an argument, she deftly positions the figure of the insect as integral to understanding not only modernist aesthetics but also the history of modernism in relation to war. Because of the popularity of Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis (1915), and because it has received so much critical attention, it would seem that very little was left to be said about the insect figure in literature. However, Kafka was only one writer in a long line who employed this figure to suggest “the powerlessness of the modern subject amid an increasingly dehumanising social reality” (5). With the destruction of the First World War, that social reality became far more pronounced; the insect figure moved beyond the realm of metaphor into reality, “as soldiers were strapped into bug-like gas masks and disguised beneath camouf lage uniforms” and as they “crawled through the mud in","PeriodicalId":44252,"journal":{"name":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","volume":"45 1","pages":"477 - 485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Modernist Exoskeleton: Insects, War, Literary Form by Rachel Murray (review)\",\"authors\":\"Brigitte N. McCray\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/0041462x-10237821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rachel Murray’s The Modernist Exoskeleton: Insects, War, Literary Form provides a valuable contribution to modernist studies because Murray explains how the field of entomology, which rose in popularity as a result of the First World War, informed modernist aesthetics. The study illustrates the benefits of greening modernism, a recent turn that has moved scholars from studying the city and human psyche in modernist texts to focusing on the intersection of modernism and the natural world. However, Murray’s accessible and fascinating study makes it clear that such a move does not ignore human subjects. Instead, it reveals the complex entanglement of humans with the environment. Murray concentrates on Wyndham Lewis, D. H. Lawrence, H.D., and Samuel Beckett, all of whose experimental work helped to define high Anglomodernism. She claims that “the figure of the exoskeleton (or outer shell) can shed new light on modernism’s linguistic and formal innovations, its engagement with key psychological and socio-political concerns, as well as its questioning of the limits of the human” (3). According to Murray, modernists responded to war, urban modernity, and industrial capitalism by turning to the insect to better understand how humans changed in response to new conditions. Modernists, she claims, began to see humans becoming more and more buglike as they were transformed on the battlefield. In making such an argument, she deftly positions the figure of the insect as integral to understanding not only modernist aesthetics but also the history of modernism in relation to war. Because of the popularity of Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis (1915), and because it has received so much critical attention, it would seem that very little was left to be said about the insect figure in literature. However, Kafka was only one writer in a long line who employed this figure to suggest “the powerlessness of the modern subject amid an increasingly dehumanising social reality” (5). With the destruction of the First World War, that social reality became far more pronounced; the insect figure moved beyond the realm of metaphor into reality, “as soldiers were strapped into bug-like gas masks and disguised beneath camouf lage uniforms” and as they “crawled through the mud in\",\"PeriodicalId\":44252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"477 - 485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-10237821\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-10237821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雷切尔·默里的《现代主义外骨骼:昆虫、战争、文学形式》为现代主义研究提供了宝贵的贡献,因为默里解释了昆虫学领域是如何在第一次世界大战中流行起来的,为现代主义美学提供了信息。这项研究说明了绿色现代主义的好处,这是最近的一个转变,使学者们从研究现代主义文本中的城市和人类心理转向关注现代主义与自然世界的交集。然而,默里通俗易懂、引人入胜的研究表明,这样的举动并没有忽视人类受试者。相反,它揭示了人类与环境的复杂纠缠。穆雷专注于温德姆·刘易斯、d.h.劳伦斯、h.d.和塞缪尔·贝克特,他们的实验工作都有助于定义高度盎格鲁现代主义。她声称“外骨骼(或外壳)的形象可以揭示现代主义的语言和形式创新,它与关键的心理和社会政治问题的接触,以及对人类极限的质疑”(3)。根据默里的说法,现代主义者通过转向昆虫来更好地理解人类如何应对新条件而发生变化,从而回应战争,城市现代性和工业资本主义。她声称,现代主义者开始发现,当人类在战场上被改造时,他们变得越来越像虫子。在提出这样的论点时,她巧妙地将昆虫的形象定位为理解现代主义美学以及与战争有关的现代主义历史的不可或缺的一部分。由于弗朗茨·卡夫卡的《变形记》(1915)很受欢迎,也受到了评论界的广泛关注,文学作品中的昆虫形象似乎已经没什么可说的了。然而,卡夫卡只是众多作家中的一个,他们用这个形象来暗示“在日益非人化的社会现实中,现代主体的无能为力”(5)。随着第一次世界大战的破坏,这种社会现实变得更加明显;“当士兵们戴上类似虫子的防毒面具,穿着迷彩服伪装起来”,当他们“在泥泞中爬行”时,昆虫的形象超越了隐喻的领域,进入了现实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Modernist Exoskeleton: Insects, War, Literary Form by Rachel Murray (review)
Rachel Murray’s The Modernist Exoskeleton: Insects, War, Literary Form provides a valuable contribution to modernist studies because Murray explains how the field of entomology, which rose in popularity as a result of the First World War, informed modernist aesthetics. The study illustrates the benefits of greening modernism, a recent turn that has moved scholars from studying the city and human psyche in modernist texts to focusing on the intersection of modernism and the natural world. However, Murray’s accessible and fascinating study makes it clear that such a move does not ignore human subjects. Instead, it reveals the complex entanglement of humans with the environment. Murray concentrates on Wyndham Lewis, D. H. Lawrence, H.D., and Samuel Beckett, all of whose experimental work helped to define high Anglomodernism. She claims that “the figure of the exoskeleton (or outer shell) can shed new light on modernism’s linguistic and formal innovations, its engagement with key psychological and socio-political concerns, as well as its questioning of the limits of the human” (3). According to Murray, modernists responded to war, urban modernity, and industrial capitalism by turning to the insect to better understand how humans changed in response to new conditions. Modernists, she claims, began to see humans becoming more and more buglike as they were transformed on the battlefield. In making such an argument, she deftly positions the figure of the insect as integral to understanding not only modernist aesthetics but also the history of modernism in relation to war. Because of the popularity of Franz Kafka’s The Metamorphosis (1915), and because it has received so much critical attention, it would seem that very little was left to be said about the insect figure in literature. However, Kafka was only one writer in a long line who employed this figure to suggest “the powerlessness of the modern subject amid an increasingly dehumanising social reality” (5). With the destruction of the First World War, that social reality became far more pronounced; the insect figure moved beyond the realm of metaphor into reality, “as soldiers were strapped into bug-like gas masks and disguised beneath camouf lage uniforms” and as they “crawled through the mud in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Novel Sensations: Modernist Fiction and the Problem of Qualia, by Jon Day, Stories and the Brain: The Neuroscience of Narrative, by Paul B. Armstrong On the Andrew J. Kappel Prize Essay Lydia Davis’s Grammatical Examples Hegel after Ulysses? The (Dis)Appearance of Politics in “Cyclops” Standard Forms: Modernism, Market Research, and “Howl”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1