走向社会主义的充分就业之路:1970年代的就业保障运动与对资本主义的挑战

Q4 Social Sciences Socialism and Democracy Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/08854300.2022.2103956
M. Dennis
{"title":"走向社会主义的充分就业之路:1970年代的就业保障运动与对资本主义的挑战","authors":"M. Dennis","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2022.2103956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frequently portrayed as a period of political fragmentation or the rise of the conservative right, the 1970s is now coming in for a different treatment, one that emphasizes the resurgence of labor organizing, the growth of progressive social movements, and even the expansion of a socialist perspective. Not only did the early 1970s witness the renewal of rank-and-file activism, which in turn drew inspiration from the antiwar movement, but it produced what historians Howard Brick and Christopher Phelps describe as a “general turn of the New Left toward socialist ideals.” This was evident in the formation of the feminist-oriented New American Movement, the establishment of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, as well as in the emergence of community activist groups such as the National Welfare Rights Organization, which focused intensively on advancing “economic justice.” Yet rather than an expression of this general tendency toward a renewed socialist perspective, the movement to achieve full employment has often been portrayed as an exclusively liberal or technocratic affair, one that failed to offer a plausible alternative in the search for solutions to the economic crisis of the era. My concern here is not with the tortured legislative process that produced the final draft of the 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins bill, except to say that the idea of guaranteeing the right to a job proved as threatening to business interests and their political allies in the 1970s as it did in the 1940s. Instead, it is to suggest that the revival of the movement for full employment","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"85 5 1","pages":"129 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Full Employment Road to Socialism: The Job Guarantee Movement of the 1970s and the Challenge to Capitalism\",\"authors\":\"M. Dennis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854300.2022.2103956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Frequently portrayed as a period of political fragmentation or the rise of the conservative right, the 1970s is now coming in for a different treatment, one that emphasizes the resurgence of labor organizing, the growth of progressive social movements, and even the expansion of a socialist perspective. Not only did the early 1970s witness the renewal of rank-and-file activism, which in turn drew inspiration from the antiwar movement, but it produced what historians Howard Brick and Christopher Phelps describe as a “general turn of the New Left toward socialist ideals.” This was evident in the formation of the feminist-oriented New American Movement, the establishment of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, as well as in the emergence of community activist groups such as the National Welfare Rights Organization, which focused intensively on advancing “economic justice.” Yet rather than an expression of this general tendency toward a renewed socialist perspective, the movement to achieve full employment has often been portrayed as an exclusively liberal or technocratic affair, one that failed to offer a plausible alternative in the search for solutions to the economic crisis of the era. My concern here is not with the tortured legislative process that produced the final draft of the 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins bill, except to say that the idea of guaranteeing the right to a job proved as threatening to business interests and their political allies in the 1970s as it did in the 1940s. Instead, it is to suggest that the revival of the movement for full employment\",\"PeriodicalId\":40061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"volume\":\"85 5 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2022.2103956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2022.2103956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪70年代经常被描绘成政治分裂或保守右翼崛起的时期,现在人们对它进行了不同的处理,强调劳工组织的复苏,进步社会运动的增长,甚至是社会主义观点的扩张。20世纪70年代初不仅见证了普通民众行动主义的复兴,这反过来又从反战运动中获得灵感,而且产生了历史学家霍华德·布里克和克里斯托弗·菲尔普斯所描述的“新左派向社会主义理想的总体转向”。这一点在以女权主义为导向的新美国运动的形成、民主社会主义组织委员会的成立以及诸如国家福利权利组织等社区活动团体的出现中都很明显,这些团体集中精力推进“经济正义”。然而,实现充分就业的运动往往被描绘成一种完全自由主义或技术官僚主义的事务,而不是一种对社会主义观点更新的总体趋势的表达,这种运动未能提供一个合理的替代方案,以寻求解决这个时代的经济危机。在这里,我所关心的并不是1978年汉弗莱-霍金斯法案最终草案的立法过程,我只想说,在20世纪70年代,保障就业权利的想法被证明对商业利益及其政治盟友构成了威胁,就像在20世纪40年代一样。相反,它建议复兴充分就业运动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Full Employment Road to Socialism: The Job Guarantee Movement of the 1970s and the Challenge to Capitalism
Frequently portrayed as a period of political fragmentation or the rise of the conservative right, the 1970s is now coming in for a different treatment, one that emphasizes the resurgence of labor organizing, the growth of progressive social movements, and even the expansion of a socialist perspective. Not only did the early 1970s witness the renewal of rank-and-file activism, which in turn drew inspiration from the antiwar movement, but it produced what historians Howard Brick and Christopher Phelps describe as a “general turn of the New Left toward socialist ideals.” This was evident in the formation of the feminist-oriented New American Movement, the establishment of the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee, as well as in the emergence of community activist groups such as the National Welfare Rights Organization, which focused intensively on advancing “economic justice.” Yet rather than an expression of this general tendency toward a renewed socialist perspective, the movement to achieve full employment has often been portrayed as an exclusively liberal or technocratic affair, one that failed to offer a plausible alternative in the search for solutions to the economic crisis of the era. My concern here is not with the tortured legislative process that produced the final draft of the 1978 Humphrey-Hawkins bill, except to say that the idea of guaranteeing the right to a job proved as threatening to business interests and their political allies in the 1970s as it did in the 1940s. Instead, it is to suggest that the revival of the movement for full employment
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socialism and Democracy
Socialism and Democracy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.
期刊最新文献
Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018)Darko Suvin, Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018) (Toronto: Political Animal Press, 2020, 280 pp., $29.99) The Old Mole and the New Democratic Party: Why the NDP is an Impediment to Social Progress in Canada On N. K. Jemisin and Speculative Fiction as a Liberatory Space The Impact of Censorship on COVID-19 Policy Formation in the United States Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of BelongingLinda Dittmar, Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of Belonging (Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2023, 240 pp., $20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1