一般拖延量表效度探索(Lay, 1986)

A. Hasanagić
{"title":"一般拖延量表效度探索(Lay, 1986)","authors":"A. Hasanagić","doi":"10.21533/EPIPHANY.V11I1.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Procrastination is defined as the act of “putting off or delaying an action to a later time.” (Bachrach, 2012). \nMeasuring procrastination is important for better understanding of this so common habit, but also, for diagnosing and therapy of it. \nLay (1986) matched procrastination with traits, big 5 theory, perfectionism, anxiety, agitation, dejection, and self-discrepancy etc. His scale General Procrastination Scale (GPS) consists of 20 items. Responses across items are summed to obtain a single score, and according to the instructions of GPS, the scale is one-factor only scale, with Cronbach alpha of 0,82 (Lay, 1986) and a retest reliability of 0,80 (Ferrari, 1989). \nThe purpose of this research is to explore psychometric characteristics of procrastination scale by Lay (1986). For this purpose, scale was applied to 480 undergraduate students. Results of this study conformed the evidence of high reliability of scale (α= 0.876). Factorial analysis at first showed five factors that were not interpretable, but rotated factorial analysis by employing Equamax rotation with Kaiser’s Normalization, showed clearer structure. According to this, there are 5 components of this scale: \nFactor 1. Good planning: items 8, 14, 15, 18, and 20. \nFactor 2. Delaying: items 5,9,11,12 and 19. \nFactor 3. Doing things in last minute: items 16 and 17. \nFactor 4. Good time management: items 3,4,6 and 13. \nFactor 5: Poor time management: items 1,2,7 and 10.","PeriodicalId":30629,"journal":{"name":"Epiphany","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Validity Exploration of General Procrastination Scale (Lay, 1986)\",\"authors\":\"A. Hasanagić\",\"doi\":\"10.21533/EPIPHANY.V11I1.283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Procrastination is defined as the act of “putting off or delaying an action to a later time.” (Bachrach, 2012). \\nMeasuring procrastination is important for better understanding of this so common habit, but also, for diagnosing and therapy of it. \\nLay (1986) matched procrastination with traits, big 5 theory, perfectionism, anxiety, agitation, dejection, and self-discrepancy etc. His scale General Procrastination Scale (GPS) consists of 20 items. Responses across items are summed to obtain a single score, and according to the instructions of GPS, the scale is one-factor only scale, with Cronbach alpha of 0,82 (Lay, 1986) and a retest reliability of 0,80 (Ferrari, 1989). \\nThe purpose of this research is to explore psychometric characteristics of procrastination scale by Lay (1986). For this purpose, scale was applied to 480 undergraduate students. Results of this study conformed the evidence of high reliability of scale (α= 0.876). Factorial analysis at first showed five factors that were not interpretable, but rotated factorial analysis by employing Equamax rotation with Kaiser’s Normalization, showed clearer structure. According to this, there are 5 components of this scale: \\nFactor 1. Good planning: items 8, 14, 15, 18, and 20. \\nFactor 2. Delaying: items 5,9,11,12 and 19. \\nFactor 3. Doing things in last minute: items 16 and 17. \\nFactor 4. Good time management: items 3,4,6 and 13. \\nFactor 5: Poor time management: items 1,2,7 and 10.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epiphany\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epiphany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21533/EPIPHANY.V11I1.283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epiphany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21533/EPIPHANY.V11I1.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

拖延症被定义为“推迟或推迟一项行动到稍后的时间”的行为。(Bachrach, 2012)。衡量拖延症对于更好地理解这个常见的习惯很重要,而且对于诊断和治疗拖延症也很重要。Lay(1986)将拖延症与大五理论、完美主义、焦虑、激动、沮丧和自我矛盾等特征相匹配。他的一般拖延量表(GPS)由20个项目组成。根据GPS的说明,量表为单因素量表,Cronbach alpha值为0.82 (Lay, 1986),重测信度为0.80 (Ferrari, 1989)。本研究旨在探讨Lay(1986)的拖延量表的心理测量特征。为此,我们对480名本科生采用了量表。本研究结果符合量表高信度的证据(α= 0.876)。因子分析一开始发现有5个因子是不可解释的,但采用Equamax旋转和Kaiser归一化的因子分析显示结构更清晰。据此,该量表有5个组成部分:因素1。好的计划:第8、14、15、18和20项。因子2。延迟:第5、9、11、12、19项。因子3。在最后一分钟做事情:第16和17项。因素4。良好的时间管理:第3、4、6和13项。因素5:糟糕的时间管理:第1、2、7和10项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Validity Exploration of General Procrastination Scale (Lay, 1986)
Procrastination is defined as the act of “putting off or delaying an action to a later time.” (Bachrach, 2012). Measuring procrastination is important for better understanding of this so common habit, but also, for diagnosing and therapy of it. Lay (1986) matched procrastination with traits, big 5 theory, perfectionism, anxiety, agitation, dejection, and self-discrepancy etc. His scale General Procrastination Scale (GPS) consists of 20 items. Responses across items are summed to obtain a single score, and according to the instructions of GPS, the scale is one-factor only scale, with Cronbach alpha of 0,82 (Lay, 1986) and a retest reliability of 0,80 (Ferrari, 1989). The purpose of this research is to explore psychometric characteristics of procrastination scale by Lay (1986). For this purpose, scale was applied to 480 undergraduate students. Results of this study conformed the evidence of high reliability of scale (α= 0.876). Factorial analysis at first showed five factors that were not interpretable, but rotated factorial analysis by employing Equamax rotation with Kaiser’s Normalization, showed clearer structure. According to this, there are 5 components of this scale: Factor 1. Good planning: items 8, 14, 15, 18, and 20. Factor 2. Delaying: items 5,9,11,12 and 19. Factor 3. Doing things in last minute: items 16 and 17. Factor 4. Good time management: items 3,4,6 and 13. Factor 5: Poor time management: items 1,2,7 and 10.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
CLASSICAL VERSUS BLACK MUSIC AS AN IDENTITY TROPE IN LANGSTON HUGHES’S THE WAYS OF WHITE FOLKS DYSFUNCTIONAL BELIEFS ABOUT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE: INTERACTION EFFECTS OF SEX AND AGE ON THE BOSNIAN SAMPLE THE ALTERNATE HISTORY OF THE 1918 FLU AS A CONSPIRACY IN DON’T NOD’S VAMPYR HAMLET’S STOIC DELAY: SHAKESPEAREAN APPROACH TO SENECAN PHILOSOPHY "FROM THE I TO THE WE": DESIRE AND BECOMING IN CARSON MCCULLERS’ THE MEMBER OF THE WEDDING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1