{"title":"汉特东部方言名词的形态标记","authors":"V. Vorobeva","doi":"10.33422/2nd.icshe.2019.06.324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research presents findings resulting from a comparative analysis of the system of nominal inflection in four dialects of the Khanty language (Vahk, Vasyugan, Surgut, Salym). The analyzed idioms belong to the Eastern cluster that is opposed to the Western one according to the contemporary classification of dialects of the Khanty language [Solovar, Nakhracheva Shiyanova 2016]. Khanty is one of the minority languages in Siberia whose dialects differ in terms of their preservation as well as in the number of speakers who use them in daily communication. Of the four dialects under analysis the Vasyugan and Salym are hardly used by the ethnic speech community. In the analyzed dialects the noun has three inflectional categories: number, case and possession. In the morphological structure of the word these categories occur in the following order: Number marker + Possession marker + Case marker. For example, 1. Vas. kĭriw-l-əm-nə vehicle-PL-POSS.1SG-LOC ‘in my boats’; 2. Vas. kĭriw-ət-nə vehicle-PL-LOC ‘in boats’. The focus of the comparative analysis is similarities and differences in the system of nominal markers in the four dialects. The noun has 3 numbers: Singular, Dual and Plural. Each number has two forms: absolute and dependent. Their use depends on the presence or absence of the possessive markers in the word structure. In example 1 above the number marker -l is used in the dependent form and the marker -ət – in the absolute one. The system of possessive markers includes numerous forms which originate from pronominal stems [Honti 1986: 38]. Possessive markers simultaneously encode the number of the possessed and the person and number of the possessor. The analysis of the dialectal forms of possessive markers, for instance, reveals the fact that in all Eastern dialects with the 1SG of the possessor forms of the dual and plural number of the possessed tend to coincide. It is illustrated by the following examples: V. köɣ-kəl-äm stone-DU-POSS.2SG ‘my two stones’ and köɣ-l-äm stonePL-POSS.2SG ‘my stones’; Sur. păn-ɣəλ-am string-DU-POSS.2SG ‘my two strings’ and pănəλ-am string-PL-POSS.2SG ‘my strings’.","PeriodicalId":20564,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education","volume":"263 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological markers of the noun in Eastern dialects of Khanty\",\"authors\":\"V. Vorobeva\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/2nd.icshe.2019.06.324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research presents findings resulting from a comparative analysis of the system of nominal inflection in four dialects of the Khanty language (Vahk, Vasyugan, Surgut, Salym). The analyzed idioms belong to the Eastern cluster that is opposed to the Western one according to the contemporary classification of dialects of the Khanty language [Solovar, Nakhracheva Shiyanova 2016]. Khanty is one of the minority languages in Siberia whose dialects differ in terms of their preservation as well as in the number of speakers who use them in daily communication. Of the four dialects under analysis the Vasyugan and Salym are hardly used by the ethnic speech community. In the analyzed dialects the noun has three inflectional categories: number, case and possession. In the morphological structure of the word these categories occur in the following order: Number marker + Possession marker + Case marker. For example, 1. Vas. kĭriw-l-əm-nə vehicle-PL-POSS.1SG-LOC ‘in my boats’; 2. Vas. kĭriw-ət-nə vehicle-PL-LOC ‘in boats’. The focus of the comparative analysis is similarities and differences in the system of nominal markers in the four dialects. The noun has 3 numbers: Singular, Dual and Plural. Each number has two forms: absolute and dependent. Their use depends on the presence or absence of the possessive markers in the word structure. In example 1 above the number marker -l is used in the dependent form and the marker -ət – in the absolute one. The system of possessive markers includes numerous forms which originate from pronominal stems [Honti 1986: 38]. Possessive markers simultaneously encode the number of the possessed and the person and number of the possessor. The analysis of the dialectal forms of possessive markers, for instance, reveals the fact that in all Eastern dialects with the 1SG of the possessor forms of the dual and plural number of the possessed tend to coincide. It is illustrated by the following examples: V. köɣ-kəl-äm stone-DU-POSS.2SG ‘my two stones’ and köɣ-l-äm stonePL-POSS.2SG ‘my stones’; Sur. păn-ɣəλ-am string-DU-POSS.2SG ‘my two strings’ and pănəλ-am string-PL-POSS.2SG ‘my strings’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education\",\"volume\":\"263 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/2nd.icshe.2019.06.324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanities and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/2nd.icshe.2019.06.324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究通过对汉特语四种方言(Vahk, Vasyugan, Surgut, Salym)的名义词形变化系统进行比较分析,得出结论。根据汉特语方言的当代分类,所分析的习语属于东方集群,与西方集群相对[Solovar, Nakhracheva Shiyanova 2016]。汉蒂语是西伯利亚的少数民族语言之一,其方言在保存情况以及在日常交流中使用这些语言的人数方面有所不同。在所分析的四种方言中,瓦苏干语和萨利姆语很少被少数民族语言社区使用。在所分析的方言中,名词有三种屈折类型:数、格和占有。在单词的形态结构中,这些类别按以下顺序发生:数标记+占有标记+格标记。例如:1。血管。kĭriw-l——əmnəvehicle-PL-POSS。sg - loc“在我的船上”;2. 血管。kĭriw- æ t-n æ vehicle-PL-LOC ' in boats '。比较分析的重点是四种方言名义标记语系统的异同。名词有三个数字:单数、双数和复数。每个数都有两种形式:绝对数和从属数。它们的用法取决于单词结构中所有格标记的存在与否。在上面的示例1中,数字标记-l用于从属形式,而标记- t -用于绝对形式。所有格标记系统包括许多源自代词词干的形式[Honti 1986: 38]。所有格标记同时编码被占有者的编号以及被占有者的人和编号。例如,对所有格标记的方言形式的分析揭示了这样一个事实,即在所有东方方言中,所有格的双数和复数形式都趋于一致。下面的例子说明了这一点:V. kö * -k * l-äm stone-DU-POSS。2SG ' my two stones '和kö -l-äm stonePL-POSS。“我的石头”;苏尔。păn -ɣəλ是string-DU-POSS。2SG ' my two strings '和piln æ λ-am string-PL-POSS。sg“我的琴弦”。
Morphological markers of the noun in Eastern dialects of Khanty
The research presents findings resulting from a comparative analysis of the system of nominal inflection in four dialects of the Khanty language (Vahk, Vasyugan, Surgut, Salym). The analyzed idioms belong to the Eastern cluster that is opposed to the Western one according to the contemporary classification of dialects of the Khanty language [Solovar, Nakhracheva Shiyanova 2016]. Khanty is one of the minority languages in Siberia whose dialects differ in terms of their preservation as well as in the number of speakers who use them in daily communication. Of the four dialects under analysis the Vasyugan and Salym are hardly used by the ethnic speech community. In the analyzed dialects the noun has three inflectional categories: number, case and possession. In the morphological structure of the word these categories occur in the following order: Number marker + Possession marker + Case marker. For example, 1. Vas. kĭriw-l-əm-nə vehicle-PL-POSS.1SG-LOC ‘in my boats’; 2. Vas. kĭriw-ət-nə vehicle-PL-LOC ‘in boats’. The focus of the comparative analysis is similarities and differences in the system of nominal markers in the four dialects. The noun has 3 numbers: Singular, Dual and Plural. Each number has two forms: absolute and dependent. Their use depends on the presence or absence of the possessive markers in the word structure. In example 1 above the number marker -l is used in the dependent form and the marker -ət – in the absolute one. The system of possessive markers includes numerous forms which originate from pronominal stems [Honti 1986: 38]. Possessive markers simultaneously encode the number of the possessed and the person and number of the possessor. The analysis of the dialectal forms of possessive markers, for instance, reveals the fact that in all Eastern dialects with the 1SG of the possessor forms of the dual and plural number of the possessed tend to coincide. It is illustrated by the following examples: V. köɣ-kəl-äm stone-DU-POSS.2SG ‘my two stones’ and köɣ-l-äm stonePL-POSS.2SG ‘my stones’; Sur. păn-ɣəλ-am string-DU-POSS.2SG ‘my two strings’ and pănəλ-am string-PL-POSS.2SG ‘my strings’.