1例严重触电伤致四肢截肢的疼痛处理

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Trauma monthly Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI:10.30491/TM.2019.104266
Shigong Guo, M. Moiz, D. H. Slater
{"title":"1例严重触电伤致四肢截肢的疼痛处理","authors":"Shigong Guo, M. Moiz, D. H. Slater","doi":"10.30491/TM.2019.104266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A 33-year-old patient presented to the Oxford Centre for Enablement for rehabilitation following severe electrical burn injuries requiring bilateral below elbow amputations, right below knee amputation and a left midfoot amputation. Specific issues: Chronic pain at the amputation sites as well as phantom limb initially proved challenging to manage medically however were eventually controlled with careful consideration of analgesic regimens. Pain was measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. A likely attributing cause for the pain was peripheral neuropathy. Management: A combination of neuropathic agents and opioids helped to control pain. These analgesic included amitriptyline, gabapentin, pregabalin, tramadol and morphine in various regimens. Paracetamol and ibuprofen were also used. Implications: Rigorous search strategies were created which interrogated the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO databases for studies reporting limb pain management in electrocution injuries. A total of 841 studies were found with 583 screened after removal of duplicates. No RCTs could be identified investigating limb pain management in electrical injuries. Case reports and case series have described various treatment options including nerve blocks, neuropathic analgesia, physiotherapy, botulinum toxin, fracture fixation and even the use of Virtual Reality headsets.  We discuss this available evidence. No consensus exists as to the optimum management approach of pain in such patients. From our experience with this patient we suggest that a multi- modal analgesic approach is likely to be needed in such patients and should therefore be considered. Level 1 research into pain management in electrocution injuries is required.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":"94 6 1","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Management in a Case of Severe Electrocution Injury and Resultant Quadruple Amputation\",\"authors\":\"Shigong Guo, M. Moiz, D. H. Slater\",\"doi\":\"10.30491/TM.2019.104266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A 33-year-old patient presented to the Oxford Centre for Enablement for rehabilitation following severe electrical burn injuries requiring bilateral below elbow amputations, right below knee amputation and a left midfoot amputation. Specific issues: Chronic pain at the amputation sites as well as phantom limb initially proved challenging to manage medically however were eventually controlled with careful consideration of analgesic regimens. Pain was measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. A likely attributing cause for the pain was peripheral neuropathy. Management: A combination of neuropathic agents and opioids helped to control pain. These analgesic included amitriptyline, gabapentin, pregabalin, tramadol and morphine in various regimens. Paracetamol and ibuprofen were also used. Implications: Rigorous search strategies were created which interrogated the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO databases for studies reporting limb pain management in electrocution injuries. A total of 841 studies were found with 583 screened after removal of duplicates. No RCTs could be identified investigating limb pain management in electrical injuries. Case reports and case series have described various treatment options including nerve blocks, neuropathic analgesia, physiotherapy, botulinum toxin, fracture fixation and even the use of Virtual Reality headsets.  We discuss this available evidence. No consensus exists as to the optimum management approach of pain in such patients. From our experience with this patient we suggest that a multi- modal analgesic approach is likely to be needed in such patients and should therefore be considered. Level 1 research into pain management in electrocution injuries is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"volume\":\"94 6 1\",\"pages\":\"5-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trauma monthly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2019.104266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2019.104266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一名33岁的患者在严重电烧伤后,需要双侧肘部以下截肢,右膝以下截肢和左足中部截肢,随后来到牛津康复中心接受康复治疗。具体问题:截肢部位的慢性疼痛以及幻肢最初证明具有挑战性,但最终通过仔细考虑镇痛方案得到控制。疼痛采用数字疼痛评定量表进行测量。疼痛的可能原因是周围神经病变。治疗方法:神经病变药物和阿片类药物联合使用有助于控制疼痛。这些镇痛药包括阿米替林、加巴喷丁、普瑞巴林、曲马多和吗啡。还使用了扑热息痛和布洛芬。意义:建立了严格的搜索策略,查询MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO数据库,以报告触电损伤中肢体疼痛管理的研究。共发现841项研究,剔除重复项后筛选出583项。未发现调查电损伤肢体疼痛管理的随机对照试验。病例报告和病例系列描述了各种治疗方案,包括神经阻滞、神经性镇痛、物理治疗、肉毒杆菌毒素、骨折固定,甚至使用虚拟现实耳机。我们讨论这些现有的证据。对于此类患者疼痛的最佳治疗方法尚无共识。根据我们对这名患者的经验,我们建议在这类患者中可能需要多模式镇痛方法,因此应予以考虑。一级研究的疼痛管理在触电伤害是必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain Management in a Case of Severe Electrocution Injury and Resultant Quadruple Amputation
Background: A 33-year-old patient presented to the Oxford Centre for Enablement for rehabilitation following severe electrical burn injuries requiring bilateral below elbow amputations, right below knee amputation and a left midfoot amputation. Specific issues: Chronic pain at the amputation sites as well as phantom limb initially proved challenging to manage medically however were eventually controlled with careful consideration of analgesic regimens. Pain was measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. A likely attributing cause for the pain was peripheral neuropathy. Management: A combination of neuropathic agents and opioids helped to control pain. These analgesic included amitriptyline, gabapentin, pregabalin, tramadol and morphine in various regimens. Paracetamol and ibuprofen were also used. Implications: Rigorous search strategies were created which interrogated the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO databases for studies reporting limb pain management in electrocution injuries. A total of 841 studies were found with 583 screened after removal of duplicates. No RCTs could be identified investigating limb pain management in electrical injuries. Case reports and case series have described various treatment options including nerve blocks, neuropathic analgesia, physiotherapy, botulinum toxin, fracture fixation and even the use of Virtual Reality headsets.  We discuss this available evidence. No consensus exists as to the optimum management approach of pain in such patients. From our experience with this patient we suggest that a multi- modal analgesic approach is likely to be needed in such patients and should therefore be considered. Level 1 research into pain management in electrocution injuries is required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Dimensions of the Anterior Column of the Acetabulum with Imaging Criteria in Patients with Surgical Acetabular Fractures Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients Using GAP, RTS and NTS Models The effect of Pregabalin on morphine consumption, sleep, mood and ability to change position after colorectal cancer surgery Titanium Elastic Nailing System, An Effective Way Of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Management Diagnostic Salivary Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1